Nursing Leadership Styles Paper

A democratic leader generally accept any opinion and voices which means that the team would feel free to voice their opinions and ideas without them being dismissed straight away. The positive side to this style is that the team/workforce can be highly motivated, skilled and experienced members can be used in decision making which makes them feel more committed and could less resistant to managerial changes it also help with communication between the workforce and the managers. The negative side to this style is that individuals can dominate participation or make disruptive contributions it can also be very time consuming for the leader because of the two communication it can also result in actions that are the most effective and also people may view this style as incompetent to handle the job responsibilities.

Nowadays, LVN and LPN are communicative more leadership roles, mostly in the skilled nursing facility. The leadership is based on general research of academic and practitioner on leader ship. Susan de wit (2014) said that there are many identified styles of leadership and laissez-faire is a style in which the leader provide little or none direction or supervisor, and prefer to take a hand off approach. That leadership style is not effective in day-to-day management of patient care. The autocratic leadership style is demonstrated when the leader makes all the decision without considering input form staff. That leadership style goal is accomplishment of task efficiently without regard to people. The democratic leadership style is who encourages

J. 2016). Clear decision making may not be set out as there is no interference from the leader or manager (Foster, 2014). This style has advantages when used with fully independent groups of nurses or health care professionals (Foster, 2014). This type of leadership may be unsatisfactory for new nurses who need more structure and guidance from their leaders (Cox, A. J. 2016). Overall, these styles are all cohesive and can be used in the nursing field in appropriate situations as each style comes with its own advantages and disadvantages (Rigolosi and Rigolosi, 2005). For example, on a regular nursing shift the coordinator may use a more democratic approach to run their shift, a situation may arise where a MET call happens and the nurse may need to take on a more authoritarian approach to save time and increase efficiency (Rigolosi and Rigolosi, 2005). Furthermore, a leader may be having a difficult time with one or more of their staff members and may need to change their style of leadership to better suit that particular staff member to ensure a good working relationship and effective communication (Goleman, D

While there are advantages of this style, authoritarian leadership does have its disadvantages. People will sometimes view an authoritarian leader as controlling and a tyrant. The followers may start to feel like they do not have any power, and generally, they will not like being told what to do and when to do it. Another disadvantage of this leadership is that sometimes the leader may not realize some complications that are obvious to the members. Authoritarian leaders may win some victories, but will end in defeat such as members will get upset and refuse to follow their leaders

Democratic Leadership is favored within a group. The group participates in goals and decision-making. A vote is often taken when decisions are made. Unfortunately the style is not very efficient despite its focus on individual ability of its members.

Thank you for your post. I also found that democratic style of leadership would best suit my personality and professional goals. Similarly, Benoliela and Somecha (2014) discuss how using participative leadership motivates employees, improves job satisfaction and outcomes, and reduces turnover. It was interesting to read about the sharp contrast between the two nursing leaders in your organization. Azaare and Gross (2011) report the style of leadership and manager’s characteristic has a direct link with dissatisfaction and turnover. You identified that the staff in your organization fear the authoritarian style director and there is a high turnover rate. Turnover is very costly financially and it drains morale.

The main difference between autocratic leadership is that employees are given a chance to voice their opinions as opposed to having one person making all the decisions. Many leaders prefer this style because it involves an active participation of every team members, which makes them to demonstrate their creativity and abilities within the organization. This makes a team to discover hidden assets that can eventually help the business grow, it also helps every member to have an opportunity for them to exercise their skills, so that they can also share their abilities in the team. Autocratic leadership that leaves the entire decision making to one person sometimes can be difficult for employees to see it from the leaders perspective. Particaptive leadership encourages other members to be involved in the process of decision making. It can also point out the strength and weaknesses to certain approach and can be resolved by the team working hand in hand to come out with the best decision for a certain company. (Leadership 2011) The downside of participated leadership is that its time consuming compared to autocratic, but usually the extra time required for this process is usually leads to a decision that eventually benefit every team member. This is ideally best means for your team or organization to be

Two leadership styles on the opposite ends of the spectrum from one another are autocratic and participative. Both can be useful depending on the setting and what is required. Autocratic leaders make decisions without using team members, even if it would be useful (mindtools.com, n.d.). When a decision needs to be made very quickly, when there is not a need for additional input, or when a team agreement is not needed, this type of leadership can work (mindtools.com, n.d.). However, autocratic leadership can be demoralizing in the workplace and can lead to a high turnover rate as well as abseentism (mindtools.com, n.d.). An example of an autocratic leader/organization would be Martha Stewart and her company, Martha Stewart Living Omnimedia.

Referring to the statistics, “most descriptive case studies support the benefits of democratic leadership style.”(Bradford and Cohen, 1984) A rigorous analysis of over 500 such studies by Johnson and Johnson (1989) showed that supportive processes are far superior to conflict-inducing processes concerning group performance and members’ satisfaction. Accordingly, it is wise for leaders to conduct a substantial amount of counsel and empower their followers.

Democratic Leadership is by far one of the broadest styles of leadership having more than 29 actual definitions of democratic styles (Bass, 1990). This is because the term democratic is ambiguous and an inconsistent belief among individuals. What one individual considers democratic, one other may not. The simplistic definition we will associate with Jan’s leadership style comes from Dr. JK White and is defined as “When group participation, discussion, and group decisions encouraged by the leader” (White & Lippitt, 1960)

Lewin, Leppit, and White were cautious in the conclusions the drew from this study. They noted that autocratic leadership does get results and is preferred over democratic leadership. However they observed that autocratic leadership can create

Democratic Leadership is the leadership style that promotes the sharing of responsibility, the exercise of delegation and continual consultation. The style has the following characteristics:

Leadership comes in many forms, and some think that leaders are made rather than born (Amanchukwu, Stanley, & Ololube, 2015). Problems are constantly arising in the nursing setting and must require a certain skill set in order for leaders to conquer these issues. In the past papers, nurse Stacie lacked the resources of a good leader to guide her towards her own leadership style. During her day as a charge nurse, Stacie allowed a more experienced nurse who was ranked below her that day, to overpower her authority. Consequently, a baby died because Stacie did not intervene when the situation presented itself. However, if Stacie had a strong leader supporting her, she may have acquired the skills to speak-up and exert her own leadership skills, while addressing the unfortunate issue in her unit. This paper will compare relevant leadership styles that will address this problem that Stacie incurred. Along with a detailed explanation of how this style of leadership could help solve this nursing problem. Furthermore, legislation and health care policies will further the cause with tools to help solve and manage problems seen in the hospital setting.

Democratic: In democratic leadership, this style is typically well-thought-out the finest decision for most businesses. The conflicting of oppressive leadership, this style highlights that management proposals guidance to its teams and subdivisions while compliant effort from distinct operate memberships. In GSK is fully controlled by democratic leadership because when GSK prepare any kind of vaccines or medicines they make up a decision by seeking with staffs.

However an Autocratic leadership style may completely ignore and dismiss input coming from employees as they are may not be open to make changes on how they do things around the company, this may alienate employees feelings of involvement towards the company that affects the morale and productivity of employees.