Nurture Vs. Nature

1. Some people have argued that the Johns Hopkins psychologist used this opportunity as an experiment to test his nurture theory of gender identity. What are the expected results of this experiment, assuming that the nurture theory is valid?

Nature or Nurture. Nature may be all of the genes and hereditary factors with which influence them to become who they are such as physical appearances and personality characteristics. Nurturing impacts people’s lives as well as how they are raised and all the environmental factors. In combination, these qualities can be the true identity of oneself. Many people may argue that nurture appears to a play huge factor in the two, but others may think otherwise. Not having both as a characteristic can have a negative effect on a person physically and mentally. The debate of nature versus nurture appears to be the oldest argument known to man, and it still remains to be unanswered. In the old-age argument nature versus nurture, nature may play a huge role in determining a person’s true identity.

Susan Evers and Sharon McKendrick, the famous identical twins from the movie The Parent Trap, were separated at a young age by their divorcing parents. Sharon grew up in Boston to a socialite mother while Susan grew up in California on her father’s ranch. Sharon had structure while Susan’s life was very laid back. They looked the same and liked many of the same things, yet their personalities were very different. What is responsible for these differences? Is it simply that they are two different people with different interests and preferences? Or did the environments that they grew up in play a part in making who they are? In the nature vs. nurture controversy, nature proclaims that our genetic make-up plays the primary role in human

As a child, I loved lying on the living room floor, crayons in hand, creating a masterpiece for my mother to

of “self and mind [being] social products” Henslin, J.M. (2013). I started to and now

Pulling from the biological perspective, genetics is the study of heredity. Through these means, this paper explores the role that biological factors play in sex differences in mental health. In order to understand the effects of genes on an individual, the mediated effects of the environment are also taken into consideration. A major argument in the field of genetics is the nature vs. nurture debate regarding the role of genes and the environment that constitute the fate of an individual. Some research has found support for sex differences in depression accounted by differences in inheritance of depression, a benefit from twin studies (Rice, Harold, & Thapar, 2002). If depression runs in the biological family, then the chances of developing depression are much higher in that individual, regardless of sex.

The dispute regarding Nature vs. Nurture continues to be the utmost intricate discussion the in the field of psychology. Rene Descartes a French theorist postulated that as humans we have particular inborn beliefs that imperishably establish our approach to the world, (Crawford. 1989). The utilization of “Nature and Nurture” has signified the parts of genetics and environmental regarding human development. It is thought by some experts that an individual’s behavior is a reaction to their genetic propensity, this is acknowledged as Nature Theory of Human Behavior,” and embraced by naturalists, (Scott, 1995). There are other experts that believe that individuals think and react in particular manner as a result of the way they are taught,

Scientists and biologist have argued the Nature versus Nurture debate for decades. This debate argues the degree to which our genetics or environment, affects our behaviour and developmental stages. Nature is described as the genetic material that makes up an individual. Nurture can be described as the way in which the environment and experiences of an individual influence their behavior and development. The debate has centered on which is a greater factor for many years but current contemporary views accept and acknowledge the intricacy of the developmental procedure and recognize that “development is not the case of nature or nurture, but rather nature and nurture” (Howard & Walton 2015) It has been shown that genetic and environmental factors are in such continuous interactions that the emergence of particular structures and functions is the result of the dependent interaction of genetics and environment.(Lewkowicz, 2011.)

One of the oldest arguments in the history of psychology is the Nature vs Nurture debate. Some famous philosophers suggested that certain things are inborn and occur naturally regardless of environmental influences. In contrast to those beliefs, other thinkers such as John Locke believe that the mind begins as a blank slate.

Nature is the genes a person is born with, nurture is how a person is raised, we either inherit it from our parents (genetics) or we learn it from our upbringing (environment). The textbook describes the clarification of nature vs nurture as making a decision, is it “the level of the individual or at the level of the individual differences within a population” (Page 163). If it is the level of the individual then there is no debate of what it is because each person has a unique set of genes. If it is at the level of the individual differences of a population then you can compare differences of genes and environment page 163. For example, if you take a population of a village living on the Yukon River, most of them probably harvest and eat salmon.

Nature is genes and it contributes to personality. Anais and sam were twins and separated at birth, and their personality are quite the same; they are both spunky, dramatic,Creative careers, both of them talk with their hands. The Jim twins were separated at birth, but they are amazing alike, This is why they both had the same IQ, same jobs of Deputy sheriff and after that was woodworking, they had wives with the same name Linda and Betty. Twins half of the time has the same homasexality by genes. Marjorie and Jenna were both Religious.

A child is born with many traits, but the environment they grow up in effects that. No child is exactly born dishonest or kind. Parenting styles and their type of punishment play a role in a child’s social behavior. Urie Bronfenbrenner argued with his ecological-systems approach that a person is affected by the systems around them such as school, economic patterns, and peers. If a child has permissive parents the child may think that yelling or stealing from others is acceptable because their parents never enforced rules at home, and then they carry that with them as they grow up. In Kathleen Berger’s textbook “Developing Person Through Childhood and Adolescence Eighth Edition” a study showed that “boys who were mistreated by their parents

The idea of “Nature vs. Nurture” is a heavily debated topic of psychology, is a person prone to certain behaviors based on their DNA or based on the environment they are raised in (Montag). As a child who struggles with sensitivity, perfectionism, and anxiety, this is a question I am very curious about. What do I need to know about the environment and people around me as I shape and define my identity? I have been influenced by the socioeconomic, political, and spiritual values of my family.

The debate of Nature vs. Nurture is possibly one of the oldest arguments in the history of psychology. This dispute regards the why as to who we are as people. There are some psychologists and non-psychologists alike who believe that people are the way they are due to their genetics, that they are simply born with a set of personality traits. Others believe that people are molded by their life experiences and the environment in which they grow up in. What each party would be surprised to discover though, is that it is actually a mixture of both of these factors.

Aim: To calculate meta-analytic estimates of heritability in liability and shared an individual – specific environmental effects from the pooled twin data.