OJ Simpson Case: Blood Evidence

Satisfactory Essays
If I was a juror in the OJ Simpson case I believe I would find him not guilty. You would think all the blood evidence would be the strongest but it’s not. In both ways the blood evidence could find him guilty and not guilty. The blood evidence if it had been collected correctly would have given us great clues pointing us to the fact of if OJ had committed the crime. Since it was not done correctly the defense attorney(s) were able to disprove the evidence as not true. This is why the blood evidence is the strongest evidence but also not the strongest, it all depends on what verdict you believe OJ should have been found as. I am still undecided but if I had to say I would say he did not commit the crime. Though we don’t really know if he did
Get Access