9. Please explain how these messages were different than the text messages the Investigator referenced on pages 7 – 9 of the Report; They are the same messages that were in the Timeline, initial packet of documents and early emails I sent to the Investigator. These text messages establish that there was a pattern of physical and emotional abuse from the Complainant against me, which substantiates my reflexive and instinctive reaction to act in self-defense, being validly afraid of physical harm from the Complainant on the night of the incident. I was given the key by the Complainant, so essentially, Complainant violated this Conduct Section, and he set me up to have this key. I did not ask for the key and I did not do this on my own. Furthermore, I was let into the building and accompanied that day by the Complainant’s friends and had been escorted around every time prior when I had entered the building. The Appeal Hearing Officer states, “He argued the evidence did not support a finding of physical abuse. However, the …show more content…
Berkeley facilities after the alleged March 10, 2016. The photos show that there are no injuries on the Complainant, and that he freely came and went anywhere he wanted to go on and around the U.C. Berkeley campus after the incident. The photos establish that, in fact, Complainant was able to go to class, to go on lunch dates on campus, that he took photos in parks on campus, that he freely went out with his friends on campus, and that he freely became intoxicated in his dorm room and surrounding areas of campus and became, in the time period immediately following this
2) Based on these observations the investigators should ask the maid why the hot tub was at an unsafe temperature. Other areas of concern include the medication Mr. Underhill was on, what time the maid got home, and how long the Underhill’s had been dead upon arrival.
Holding: Kelbel's conflicting explanations for Kailyn's injuries did not coincide with testimonies given my medical examiners, Lindsey, Olster, and a neighbor, so the court holds that evidence presented is sufficient for the jury to reach a verdict. The court also concludes
The judges conclude that Hasanie did not establish his case of having been dismissed without cause, or having been constructively dismissed.
2. List the questions raised about this situation or that you think that the investigators should ask of the
Testimony this Thursday morning began with a New York State Police Investigator who is part of the computer crimes unit. She said her analysis of Michael Beard's phone is that there was quiet a bit of deleting and a lot of powering off, including more than 100 deleted calls.
At around 0136 hours dispatch advised Jessica Johnson called dispatch. Dispatch said Jessica advised the male subject (Mekeal) would be coming to the front desk to talk to the Resident Assistant (RA). I let dispatch know I had contact with Mekeal and his friends. When Mekeal came to the desk he was on the phone with his mom. Mekeal said he heard the Police was wanting to speak to him. I let him know we did want to speak with him. I asked for him to sit at the table in the waiting area while I got my paperwork from my vehicle. I went to my vehicle and got a Miranda Rights Advisement Form and WSU PD Witness
Identify and discuss the various types of written or oral communication presented in the case and the guidelines for each type of communication. Consider the prosecution, defense, witnesses, and the judge. Write an arrest-and-incident police report using the specified guidelines and parameters for report writing as outlined in the assigned readings. Assume the role of the investigating officer. The report must be factual, accurate, objective, and complete. Ensure the police report is as long as necessary, concise, clear, and mechanically correct.
2. List the questions raised about this situation or that you think that the investigators should ask of
However, a rational appeal would be that by law Christopher Barber should be punished for what he did to his son. Even though she did not want to hurt him intentionally, it still caused him his life. It changed the life of those around him. Christopher Barber also made his life change in a big way since on his record it will say that he was charged with the death of his own son. It was wrong for Christopher Barber to treat his son the way he did.
On November 17, 2015, at approximately 1149 hours, LFCC Student Ashby, Berry approached the information service desk and advised Ms. Cindy D’Ambro that he needed to speak to a Police or Security Officer regarding a matter. At that time I Sergeant Clyde Hilliard was in the back room of the Information Service Office making a copy. I responded out and met with Student Ashby Berry # 6783310. Mr. Ashby advised he is currently taking a class in room #207 and the Professor is Mohamad Riasati. Mr. Ashby notified Sgt. Hilliard that one of his class mates has already departed the class room and he is leaving early because he feels like the Professor is drunk and falling asleep during the class. He mentioned that several Students in the class room are talking about how hammered he is. Mr. Ashby further advised he feels like he is paying a lot of money for the class and he feels like the Professor should not be drunk.
Stephen F. Austin is a beautiful school surrounded by tall pine trees and lakes. With the small population of students that attend this university compared to, for example, the University of Texas, most students and parents would not suspect that many crimes occur on campus. Stephen F. Austin is not high on the crime list compared to other universities, but it is not completely sound either. Last year, around the spring semester, there were several rumored cases of young women being beaten by an unidentified male. Due to these rumors many students did not feel safe walking around campus, especially at night. In the Crime Log for Stephen F. Austin there were a reported of twenty-four burglaries from 2013-2015, and four reported forcible assaults with three of them occurring in on campus housing. This semester a fraternity on campus, Alpha Tau Omega, was accused of sexually assaulting a student during one of their events. The young women claimed to have been drugged and then sexually assaulted by several different men. Grand jurors’ chose not to indict anyone; therefore, the case was dropped.
A young white Hartford student, Brianna Brochu, was arrested and charged with third-degree criminal mischief and second-degree breach of peace on Saturday for bullying her university roommate, Chennel “Jazzy” Rowe. Police arrested her after she boasted online calling her “Jamaican Barbie” and admitting to tampering with her belongings. She has confessed to atrocities such as “putting her toothbrush where the sun don't shine” and smearing period blood on the girl’s backpack for nearly over a month. Rowe was not aware of the harassment until she became fed up with feeling unwanted in her own room and as she was moving out a dorm an advisor approached her and showed her the post. This atrocious hate crime is being dealt with by the University but after they asked Rowe not to talk about it, she refused to let it be swept under the rug and livestreamed her story.
Later, David Cash became a college student at University of California Berkeley (UC Berkeley), and protestors believe that Cash should be expelled from the university due to his close involvement with a child murder case. However, the university is not legally entitled to apply punitive charges beyond its own policy or beyond the university's environment. Strohmeyer committed the crime in Nevada, before David Cash was a student at UC Berkley, but in front of the university, the protestors express their frustration: Shouting "Expel him!"
Prior to the hearing, the Organization had requested in writing a copy of the Locomotive Event Recorder Download from Locomotive CSXT 4302 and all statements or reports submitted (see TR, page 11, lines 18-36). These pertinent documents were never provided to the Organization during discovery; in fact, if provided, would have proved Ms. Harris complied with all SFRTA Operating Rules pertaining to General Securement Requirements and Securement of Cars.
However, despite recognizing that there was prejudice against the Aboriginals within the community, Esson C, J rejected and dismissed the motion stating the need for more evidence based there was no reasonable possibility that it would lead to partiality in the trial.