OSHA Compliance Case Study

OSHA, or the Occupational Safety and Health Administration, was created with the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970 by Congress. The purpose of OSHA was to ensure that workers would have a safe work environment. This has been done by creating and enforcing safety laws and providing adequate training and education for the workers. It is important for an agency, like OSHA, to oversee these safety guidelines because it creates a standard for safety and health across all workplaces. OSHA requires employers (with more than 10 employees) to keep records of injuries, illnesses, and fatalities among their workers (other employers may also be required to keep records if requested by OSHA, the Bureau of Labour Statistics, or other state health

The Supreme Court was requested to rule on the cotton dust standard using the OSHA’s mandate under section 3(8) whose objective was to protect workers from the exposure of hazardous materials. In the Department of Industrial Union, the Benzene decision decided by a divided court invalidated the OSHA 's benzene standard. According to the judges, OSHA had to base its findings on substantial evidence rather than mere assumptions. These records should show that occupational exposure to the regulated substance presents significant health risk (Schulte, et al., 2014).

Before carrying out work activities make sure you 've been given sufficient training and that you follow the companies health & safety policies.

After the compliance officer from OSHA visited the facility there were some workers who were injured and some

Each childminder will be registered and inspected with Ofsted to ensure that they are able to demonstrate the quality and standards of care required by Ofsted, the Early Years Foundation Stage and the NCMA.  Each childminder must ensure that they provide high quality childcare, within a positive, safe and happy environment.  Childminders are responsible for planning and preparing a programme of play based activities and in the completion of all relevant record keeping, paperwork and administration.

Current events that surround safety and involvement in these unsafe related subjects seen as oversight in the area personal protective equipment. In the OSHA news release dated 02/24/2016 OSHA reported that the company “OSHA cited Heritage Thermal Services for failing to: Monitor work areas and evaluate the effectiveness of respirators. Implement a decontamination procedure. Provide adequate personal protective equipment and ensure it was used by employees” (OSHA, 2016). In the article it is clear that this company has violated the “General Duty Clause” that OSHA has prescribed as a mandate to follow. Based on this report OSHA goes on to say that “CLEVELAND - Federal inspectors found toxic exposure to aniline that sent a 56-year-old service

1910.334(a)(1) Handling of the equipment. Bonnie ran an extension cord across to an outlet which could be hazardous in the workplace. Someone could trip over the cord and depending if it was the appropriate length to reach the outlet it could damage the socket if being stretched causing damage to the outlet. Also 1910.334(a)(2) Visual Inspection. The equipment was not inspected before use.

Describe how current health and safety legislation, policies and procedures are implemented in the setting.

The benefits that OSHA'S alliances provide to businesses and worksites in general industry is that it allows for businesses, trade, professional organizations, educational institutes and unions to collaborate to offer a large pool of resources and expertise that are used to develop compliance assistance tools, resources and shared information that focus on safety and health issues that relate to employers, employees, and the work environment. (OSHA, 2013) This give the worksites a great resources to help answer questions, solve problems and offer guidance through the collaboration. These program participants do not recieve exemptions from OSHA inspections or other enforcement benefits. (OSHA, 2013) Some participant benefits include increased

This investigation into AKM LLC dates back from January 11, 2002 through April 22, 2006. OSHA states that the company did not prepare incident forms, incident logs, or year end summaries as they were to be filled out and some not at all. In November of 2006, OSHA issued 171 citations and a total of $13,300 in fines. The violation dates ranged from as far out as 4.5 years to a little over 6 months before the citation and fines were issued to the company. This company felt that the citations and fines were untimely and wanted them to be dismissed for this reason. An ALJ with the Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission (OSHRC) upheld the citations and fines, so the company decided to appeal.

Within the Health Care industry, there are a wide variety of risks. The Health Care industry has a higher ratio of accidents or injuries to all other industries in this sector.

The dilemma for organizations that have particularly serious regulatory issues is the organization must figure out how to adhere to the regulations but still be able to function as a profitable business. These organizations are also faced with the challenge of federal agencies being able to tell them what to do and how to do it. Organizations are faced with the issue of being cooperative with the federal agency despite what they feel is right for their business (Potoski & Prakash 2004). Organizations that do not adhere to the regulations are also faced the agencies being able to access fines and other penalties that may force a business to close. Jay should resolve the differences in requirements by complying with OSHA request. But he should

Jay should research, study, and analyze each of the regulatory issues and comply with the federal, OSHA, and state laws. The difficulty that organizations are having that especially have serious managerial issues are that in the event that they are not in OSHA standards that the association can be closed down. They may have to pay a strong fine as well. “OSHA standards may require that employers adopt certain practices, means, methods, or processes reasonably necessary and appropriate to protect workers on the job. Employers must become familiar with the standards applicable to their establishments and eliminate hazards” (Department of Labor, 2009). The Act urges states to create and work their own particular employment security and wellbeing

The Occupational Safety and Health Act (OSHA), often referred to as the "OSH Act," was enacted in 1970 by President Richard M. Nixon. Its purpose is to assure safe and healthful working conditions for men and women (EPA, 2006). The Act is administered and enforced at the national level by the Occupational Safety and Health Administration, a division of the US Department of Labor. The application of the OSH Act in the current employment climate will be discussed as it applies to a variety of industries; considerations that are most applicable to the specific type of industry will be discussed initially, and those that are equally important regardless of the type of business will complete the section. Finally, this paper will discuss how the

Currently, there are no specific exposure limits for airborne nanoparticles, although occupational exposure limits (OELs) exist for numerous larger particles with similar chemical composition. It is imperative to recognize that OELs recommended for non-nanoscale particles likely are not health protective for nanoparticle exposures. A specific example of this is demonstrated with graphite where the the OSHA Permissible Exposure Limit [PEL] may not be a safe exposure limit for carbon nanotubes. Nanomaterial use can be regulated by the OSHA General Duty Clause, Section 5(a)(1). Additionally, OSHA has prepared a Nanotechnology Safety and Health Topics Page on the OSHA