Obamacare Ethical Dilemmas

The United States is known as one of the greatest world powers: however it is held back by its weak healthcare system. As of 2010 the US healthcare system currently ranks the 37th best out of 190 countries (Murray). Before the introduction of the Affordable Care Ac in 2010, the United States had an individual insurance market. It was the responsibility of the individual or their employer to take care of their healthcare costs. On top of this, millions of people could be denied insurance by different agencies due to pre-existing claims. Healthcare was expensive, but the costs were nothing compared to the medical bills owed by an uninsured person. Universal healthcare is a basic right not a privilege. Everyone should be given the

In today’s day and age, American households can all agree that health insurance is not a luxury, but a necessity. Without it, costs of emergency room visits and prescription medicines can be financially devastating. However, in the past many families and individuals have taken the risk of not being insured due to the high cost of the insurance itself. To attempt to reform this unfair system, the Obama administration signed into law the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act in 2010. The law, coined “Obamacare,” has received much opposition due to its expansion government programs and increase in spending. It brings to question how much the government should be involved in an area that for the majority of America’s history, has been

Acts never pass through Congress without opposition. Someone in Congress always opposes a bill, sometimes without sensible rationale. When a bill affects as many people as the Affordable Care Act does, it can spark heated debates and controversy on an extremely large scale. Right from the start, the country has split in two over this act. Although the ACA is often the subject of criticism and censure, it helps millions of people across the country on a daily basis.

America faces a choice, keep The Affordable Care Act (ACA), also known as Obamacare, or scrap it and come up with something better. The ACA in its entirety leaves room for improvement. It could do better, much better, if it weren’t for matters of political expediency. Currently the United States spends more on health care than any other country. According to a Huffington Post article (2013) the U.S. spends about 17.2 percent of their GDP on medical care. Health care per capita is approximately $8,608, second only to Switzerland, which spends $9,121.

As the implementation of The Affordable Care Act (ACA) nears, news media is featuring a large number of individuals whose health insurance coverage is being cancelled. The current administration claims that their objective is for everyone to have health insurance, but there is a gap between their new legislation and the results. American consumers are falling in the gap between private insurance plans that are too expensive, and the poorly developed government system. Despite claims from the Obama administration, the Affordable Care Act limits the American public’s choice of private health insurance plans.

The first thing to think about is the fact that health care accounts for approximately 8% of the U.S. economy. The Affordable Care Act, better known as Obamacare or other unsavory names is actually in my mind making the medical field and the availability of care for patients more difficult. Regardless of its benefits to some patients, Obamacare is making things much more difficult for doctors, nurses and anyone that is part of the medical profession. It has done nothing but increase paperwork, which is the major priority, and costs have continued to rise. From what I have witnessed has done nothing to increase the quality of care. Government bureaucrats and insurance companies, not doctors, are in charge of our health care. Obamacare is all about saving money, by not spending it on patient care and where the money is spent is being directed by special interest and profit-making organizations. They are dictating the way care is provided. Basically insurance companies are in control of who lives or who dies. The law contains spending cuts to Medicare that amount to $716 billion from 2013 to 2022. The end result of course is that seniors are the group that suffers the most since they are the group that seeks and needs medical care more than any other age group. Money is the priority and not patient care as government and insurance companies have a different agenda than health care providers. Should “for-profit” insurance companies exist, or should there be only “non-profit”

The most-recent court case, attempting to discredit and possibly break Obamacare, is known as King v. Burwell. This case is the third in the past four years to have arguments presented before United States Supreme Court challenging the constitutionality of Obamacare, which is unusual as the Supreme Court is typically selective of the cases it chooses to hear and doesn’t take many cases a year (Four Words Could Bring the Law Down). Prior cases brought before the Court questionedthe legality of forcing individuals to cover themselves ( known as “individual mandate” ), religious objections to birth control, and other mandated coverage elements.

Health care reform and access to insurance have been staples of the American political agenda ever since the end of World War II. From President Truman’s call for universal coverage in the late 1940’s to the creation of Medicaid and Medicare to the Affordable Care Act, both parties have debated how to lower the rate of uninsured Americans. After nearly 70 years of debate in Washington and beyond, the number of Americans with health insurance has certainly grown (Miller, 2014). However, the number of people in the United States without coverage is still unacceptably high and a problem that should be addressed with a great deal of urgency and care.

The Obama affordable health care politics has caused many fights among different groups who don’t seem to share and to agree on the politic behind the ACA. The purpose of this reading has mainly been to point out the reasons of the disagreement toward the ACA.

Many people in the United States at some point in their life pay for health insurance or health care. Usually the people who pay for health insurance is either retired from work or are in their primes with children to care for. There are many other kinds of health care associations in the U.S., but there’s a major health insurance cooperation in today’s society that is causing problems in America’s economy and causing major drops in unemployment rates everywhere in the U.S., named after the 44th president of the United States of America, President Barack Obama, Obamacare is a type of health care system that is outrageously expensive and money consuming, putting Americans into serious debt. It had once been seen as a plan to help Americans

United States of America is the only advanced nation that does not provide their citizens with some sort of health coverage. Americans go on with health care if they can afford it and those who are not able to afford health care have trouble dealing with health care coverage or poor treatment. In fact, thirty- two million Americans deal with no health care. This being true, President Obama followed through with the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act of 2010. Ever since then, there has been chaos between two opposing groups, the Pro Health Care and Con Health Care.

Body paragraph 1: One issue that's been debated throughout the 2016 election is healthcare. More specifically Obamacare and Medicare. I agree with Hillary's plan of action; to expand Medicare and uphold Obamacare. She says that “healthcare should be affordable and available in each state.” (Procon.com) Meanwhile Donald Trump’s stance on this issue is that he thinks that Obamacare is a disaster and that it should be demolished. He thinks that it's way too much money and that the lower class citizens aren't able to afford it. Another issue that's come up involving healthcare is the amount of money spent on pharmaceutical drugs. Medicine for high cholesterol is so pricey that it's being debated whether or not we should even have it. $4.6 million

The United States does not provide health care to its citizens the way the rest of the countries do. Instead of guaranteeing that all are covered, it works at a market-based system where those who are insured, receive their coverage as a condition of employment, whereas others must purchase individual policies or obtain coverage through Medicaid or private insurance companies, and not everyone would qualify to receive health care benefits. For decades, health care has been an issue for the country, especially for the people who are ill and cannot afford coverage. However, when Obama became president, he created a law that allows more opportunities for the population to receive health insurance without further complications or strict

Obamacare may be one of the most debatable topics at the moment ever since 2010. For those who are still confused on what Obamacare is and how it works is understandable and common amongst Americans. Obamacare is also known as the Affordable Care Act. It can be summed up as a law that ensures every American has access to health insurance that is affordable and within their budget. This is done by offering people discounts on government-sponsored health insurance plans, and by expanding the Medicaid assistance program so they include more people who can’t afford health care. In order for someone to qualify for Obamacare they must have an insurance plan that covers at least ten essential services that pertain

Thank you, Nicole, for your post. Yes, it is morally right and ethical for every single American to have access to healthcare. It would be heart wrenching to turn someone away just because of insurance or lack of money. Unfortunately, just because it’s right doesn’t make it a right. It is important to look beyond the surface. Although, it is undeniable that Universal Healthcare will give more access to healthcare for so many people. So much so that the World Health Organization (WHO) is urging President Trump to expand Obamacare and ensure all Americans have access to healthcare (Nebehay, 2016). However, hypothetically, within the proposal of a universal healthcare, the question is asked: How do we pay for it? Of course, the answer is simple.