Obergefell Vs. Hodges Case Study

In Obergefell v. Hodges, the United States Supreme Court held that same sex couples can now exercise the fundamental right of marriage nationwide. Justice Kennedy reached this result by redefining what marriage is.

In the aftermath of the Supreme Court Case Obergefell v. Hodges (2015) which nationally legalized same sex marriage, the religious right has felt that protections on religious liberty in this country have gone under attack. As the LGBTQ+ movement gains more traction in mainstream media, local municipalities, and even state governments, many religiously conservative states legislatures have begun to fight back by passing laws that protect a person’s right to discriminate against the LGBTQ+ community because of religious objections. While a person’s right to abstain from participating in a business transaction concerning a same sex marriage has been widely debated (and continues to be widely debate) for some time now, the new anti-transgender

As a general rule, constitutional law examination differs depending on the nature of the right that is being asserted in a case. In the Constitution people have various rights such as freedom of speech, freedom of religion, etc. Other rights in the Constitution are not presented in the Constitution, but they are arguably stated within its context. In this paper I will agree that the Supreme Court case Obergefell v. Hodges was right in affirming the equal rights of same-sex couples based on the due process clause of the fourteenth amendment. The Court’s ruling in this case has an effect on the legal rights of children of same-sex couples, the rights of people who identify as gay, and the states’ sovereign right to enact legislation that defines

In the court case Obergefell et al. v. Hodges, the court ruled in favor of the plaintiff. It was hardly an overwhelming vote; the majority vote was 5-4. The court case was on the subject of same sex marriage. The court ruled that the right to same sex marriage was protected under the constitution. At first, I did not really disagree with the ruling; I do not believe same sex marriage is right, but if that is what they want then it is their choice. After reading about the case, however, I have changed my mind. After reading the dissents of the Chief Justices that did not agree, my stance changed.

The Supreme Court is the highest judicial court in a county or a state and it is the highest federal court in the United States today. Today I will be reviewing the case of Obergefell v. Hodges which was a Supreme Court case about same sex marriage. I will review the justice who wrote the opinion of the court and the justice who wrote the dissenting opinion for this case.

In Obergefell v. Hodges, the plaintiffs, including fourteen same-sex couples, argued for their marriages performed legally in another state to be recognized in their state of residence. They were asking that the privileges and responsibilities of marriage be granted to them as they would to any opposite-sex couple. The plaintiffs gave examples of how unequal protection negatively affects them to convince the judges that they should have their marriage recognized. Obergefell was denied being included in his spouse’s death record. DeBoer was disallowed adoption with her spouse, which could cause issues should one of the children become sick or one of the parents die.

The decision reached at the Supreme Court regarding the case of Obergefell v. Hodges is that same-sex couples have a fundamental right to be allowed to marry each other. To make it plain and simple, my belief is that I agree with the court’s decision. Whether you are a homosexual couple or heterosexual couple, I believe your marriage rights should be equal and not separated due to any religious beliefs and other’s personal feelings. I believe people have a fundamental right to practice their religion, but that right doesn’t grant anyone the power to force said religious beliefs onto anyone. America is the land of the free, you can do what you believe in as long as it doesn’t harm others and is safe for yourself and the people whom are affected

Does the verdict of Obergefell v. Hodges make people cast aside their beliefs to follow the law?

Same sex marriage has always been a sore spot in American Politics. Republicans used the religion card as the stanzas for disapproval, while Democrats fought to allow the freedom to love who we love in this world. The Obergefell vs. Hodges case legalized same sex marriage throughout all fifty states. The fight to legalize same sex marriage had been ongoing since the early nineties. With the right to for lasting legal bonds until and after death do them part, questions remain. What made this case so much more effective than those that proceeded it? In what ways are the right to marry whom we want being protected? And with the current elected officials, will this ruling stand or be overturned?

Imagine being a homosexual United States citizen. Although life up until recently was difficult because of the constant discrimination, not being able to adopt children, strange looks when being with significant others, not being able to marry, and many more, the Supreme Court case Obergefell v. Hodges solved one of those problems. The law changed in June 2015 when President Obama issued that same-sex marriage was legal. Although the gay pride assemblage was satisfied that one of their problems was solved, the homophobic, heterosexual caucus was far from satisfied and discriminated the LGBT community even more. Many Christian companies that provide goods and services for people refused to provide homosexual consumers with their products simply

As a Human Resource Manager, the understanding of the Equal Employment Opportunity laws are initially overwhelming, due to the amount of information dedicated to the subject. However, it is vitally important to comprehend and apply these laws to any organization, in order to avoid claims or litigation. Companies need to educate management to “take reasonable care to prevent and promptly correct discrimination and establish anti-discrimination policies” (SHRM, 2014). The EEOC is not out to get employers, but was “established to administer and enforce the Civil Rights Act at work” (Dessler, 2015, p. 28). Successful compliance with EEOC law ultimately depends on authentic and dedicated belief in the capabilities and value of each individual and cultivates a diverse and sincerely non-discriminating workplace. In my view, the core of this and other civil rights law finds its origins in the biblical worldview, that all men are created equal in the sight of God and are bestowed with unique gifts and abilities. Our law points to the gift of God that we live in a nation dedicated on protecting what God has created.

In a memorable choice, the U.S. Incomparable Court decided Friday that gay and lesbian couples the nation over have a sacred right to wed.

Obergefell v. Hodges was started by same-sex couples throughout the country claiming that denial of their right to marry was against the Fourteenth Amendment. After months of argument, the court finally decided in favor of the couples. Of course, as this topic has been argued for years, it safe to say there will be unfavorable consequences for those involved in a church.

The EEOC laws, or Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, are federal laws that enforce employers to not discriminate against applicants of any background. Discrimination by types such as age, disability, equal pay/compensation, genetic information, harassment, national origin, pregnancy, race/color, religion, retaliation, sex, and sexual harassment are all protected under the EEOC laws. It is also illegal for an employer to “discriminate against a person because the person complained about discrimination, filed a charge of discrimination, or participated in an employment discrimination investigation or lawsuit.” (EEOC , n.d.) The EEOC laws are to help serve justice and to create an equal work environment for people of any kind. The EEOC wants to accomplish the goal of having every applicant to feel at home without being discriminated against. These laws not only affect an employer hiring an applicant however; it affects them in firing, promoting, harassing, training, wages, and benefits. The EEOC’s role is to help find out if any applicant is being discriminated against and to help

While each company and corporations have a lot of freedom to choose the employees they feel is right for the company, and should have choices, in many cases excellent candidates could be looked over because of their skin color, age or disability (EEOC, n.d.) (Lau & Johnson, 2011). Subsequently, the government has based various laws to protect people that fall into specific classes, Lau and Johnson, (2011, p.213) named these classes as race, color, religion, sex, national origin, and then later, age and disability were added to these protected classes.