When you think of a tragedy, what comes to mind? A sad story? A terrible fate? Oedipus the King, by Sophocles, is a Greek play that Aristotle regards as “the perfect example of tragedy”. The play follows the fall of a man running from a terrible destiny. However, despite his intentions, he fulfills the very destiny he tries so hard to avoid. As the town discovers what happened, everyone, including Oedipus, struggles to come to terms with what has passed. Oedipus’ self-blinding is an attention-seeking act, because of how, like Oedipus himself, it was dramatic, and was a result of his pride.
Oedipus can be viewed as dramatic due to his excessively overplayed interactions with the other characters. During the scene with Tiresias, due to his reluctance to provide information in regard to Laius’ death, Oedipus is annoyed and eventually is filled with rage toward Tiresias. Despite Tiresias being averse to revealing his “dreadful secrets” (20), Oedipus continues to question and mock him in hopes of getting helpful information out of the old seer. Ultimately, Tiresias gives up and says, in truth, that Oedipus is “the murderer… the unholy defilement of this land” (21). Oedipus rejects the truth, within his exaggerated accusations that Tiresias has “invented this story” (23) to harm him. With this, Oedipus’ dramatic actions represent the motif of blindness.
…show more content…
However, his pride and arrogance prompts a blindness against the truth. This blindness leads Oedipus down the road to misery and darkness. Oedipus is told that he “would be better dead than blind” (76), because his people believe that the act was unnecessary. Physically blinding himself only furthers his torment as opposed to shielding himself from it, in the sense that he would be better off dead. His arrogance blinds him from seeing the truth and instead of accepting it, he lets it become his
The motif of blindness is first shown when Tiresias tells Oedipus that he is the murderer. Tiresias didn’t want to tell Oedipus the
In Oedipus the King, Tiresias enters tremulously with the knowledge of Oedipus’ family lineage, actions, and fate, which Oedipus is blind to. After Oedipus insists for the cure of the plague, Tiresias reveals that Oedipus is the cause of the all the destruction in Thebes. As a result, Oedipus is in denial, as he says Tiresias has “eyes blind as stones”(181). Despite being blind, Tiresias is the only character who can see the fate of Oedipus. Ironically, Oedipus “with [his] precious eyes,/... [is] blind to the corruption of [his] life”(183).
The use of hamartia is a key component to a tragedy in Greek times. In the festival of Dionysus, the use of hamartia played a key role in the production of tragic plays that enhances the audience experience in establishing morals and ideals in many different ways. Sophocles’ Oedipus the King is a key example of this, a play about the unfortunate destiny bestowed upon Oedipus. During the play, Oedipus attempts to flee from his destiny that he will marry his mother and kill his father. The dramatic irony where Oedipus tries to doubt the gods is imprudent and foolish, and his hamartia further led him to his tragic downfall. Throughout this tragedy, the use of hamartia is used to justify the catastrophic events that happened to Oedipus and his
The ancient Greeks were famous for their tragedies. These dramas functioned to “ask questions about the nature of man, his position in the universe, and the powers that govern his life” (“Greek” 1). Brereton (1968) stated that tragedies typically “involved a final and impressive disaster due to an unforeseen or unrealized failure involving people who command respect and sympathy. It often entails an ironical change of fortune and usually conveys a strong impression of waste. It is always accompanied by misery and emotional distress” (20). The play, Oedipus the King, by Sophocles definitely demonstrated the characteristics of an impressive disaster unforeseen by the protagonist that involved a character of
At the beginning of the play, Oedipus uses verbal violence to threaten Tiresias. A plague has struck the city of Thebes, and Oedipus learns from Kreon that the plague will only end when the murderer of Laius has been caught. When Oedipus asks Tiresias for help, Tiresias initially refuses to share what he knowns and instead comments about Oedipus’ inability to see the truth. However, Oedipus becomes infuriated and insults the blind prophet. “Now I see it all. You helped hatch the plot…with your own hands…Old man. You’ve lost your power, stone-blind, stone-deaf- senses, eyes blind as stone” (103-104). The quote is an example of verbal violence because Oedipus curses and insults Tiresias, accusing the prophet of conspiring against him with the help of Kreon. Tiresias then introduces another riddle, telling Oedipus that the murderer of Laius is both the father and sibling to his incestuous children, and also the son of his beloved wife. When Oedipus mocks Tiresias for answering only in riddles, Tiresias responds with, “Ah, but aren’t you the best man alive at solving riddles?” (105). As described here, Oedipus presents himself as extremely confident in his ability to untangle puzzles, but this ultimately leads to his own downfall. Given these examples, it is evident that Oedipus’ use of verbal violence against Kreon and Tiresias accurately illustrates his
In the Greek tragedy, Oedipus, he was constantly told throughout the story that he was “blind”. The idea of blindness, both figuratively and physically, are very important in the story. The farther the reader gets in the story, the more irony will be found around the concept of blindness. Oedipus fulfilled the prophecy of killing his father and marrying his mom but refused to see all this signs. The blind prophet Tiresias repeatedly told Oedipus that he was the killer. Near the end of the story he comes to realize that he in fact killed his dad and married his mom. This results in him taking his own eyesight because he sees how blind he's been and goes back to the mountain where it all started. “
From the very beginning, what makes Oedipus ' actions in his quarrel with Teiresias and also throughout the play so dramatically compelling, is the fact that the audience knows the outcome of the story. We know Oedipus ' fate even before he does, and there is no suspense about the outcome itself, instead, the audience anxiously awaits Oedipus to reveal his fate unto himself in his desperate quest to rid his city of the terrible plague, or maybe even more so, to simply discover his own unfortunate tale. Oedipus is relentless in his pursuit of the truth, and his determination is commendable. There is nothing that compels him to act in this way, instead he freely chooses, with much zeal, to initiate the chain of events that will ultimately lead to his downfall. It is this interplay between Oedipus’ own free will and his fated eventuality that is the crux of the play, and constitutes the main dramatic power.
Before there was the play, Oedipus the King, there was King Laius and Queen Jocasta, rulers of the cursed Thebes. However, things weren’t going their way as Laius learned from the oracle that his son, which was trying to have, would kill him and marry his wife. With this information, he said that he wouldn’t have a son, but by that time, it was too late. And with that, he ordered a servant to bind the child to the wild, and let nature the rest. However, the servant couldn’t bare it, so the servant decided to send the child to Corinth, another kingdom, as he would be raised by royalty. Yet, that wouldn’t last long as Oedipus, the named son, was told by the oracle that would eventually kill his father and marry his mother. Determined not to follow that fate, he left home and head towards Thebes, where he would do his father no harm. Little did he know that during his travels, he would meet Laius, his real father, and get into a fight, eventually killing him. After that, he decided to be a hero and solve the riddle of the Sphinx, where he
The ancient Greek philosopher Aristotle once identified the key ingredients of the tragedies that his culture is so famous for. These ingredients include a character with a fatal flaw, the realization of the fault for a particular problem and the final sudden reversal of fortune. For many tragedies, the fatal flaw is demonstrated as excessive pride, which usually serves as the driving force of the play’s action. It is common, even beneficial, to have pride in oneself, but when it becomes expressed as arrogance or in defiance of one’s fate, it is considered excessive and often leads men to engage in activities that will lead to their downfall. Aristotle (1998) stated “the tragic hero falls into bad fortune because of some flaw in his
There are many characteristics that make someone a tragic hero. In the story Oedipus The King, there are several characteristics that benefit Oedipus as a ruler. In the play Oedipus The King, Oedipus displays three heroic characteristics: he is a man of action, caring, and trustworthy.
Oedipus intelligence could not see the truth, but the blind man, Teiresias, saw it plainly. Sophocles uses blindness as a theme in the play. Oedipus was uninformed and as a result blind to the truth about himself and his past. Yet, when Teiresias exposes the truth he is in denial. It is left to Oedipus to conquer his blindness, accept the truth, and realize fate. But instead Oedipus ridicules Terirsias blindness and accuses him of being on the side of Kreon and helping him become King. He accuses Teiresias for being paid to tell a fraudulent prophecy to him. Quickly Teiresias answers him back and tells him he is BLIND, and tells him about his past of who his actual mother and father was.
At the beginning, Oedipus is ignorant and is constantly avoids and ignores the truth in order to protect his reputation. Oedipus’ unwillingness to open his ears to the truth develops when Tiresias reveals that he killed Laius and one of his responses is, “Your words are nothing-- / futile” (416-417). Although Oedipus begged to hear Tiresias’ words, he was not willing to pay attention or open his eyes to the unfortunate idea. Oedipus pushes aside the words Tiresias says, refusing to believe that he could be the one who killed Laius, the one who must be cursed. Later, Tiresias brings up Oedipus’ ignorance saying “you’re blind to the corruption of your life” (471), and telling him a few lines later that “No man will ever / be rooted from the earth as brutally as you” (488-489). Oedipus was put in his place and blatantly told that he is ignorant but his rise to knowledge will also bring his demise. Sophocles foreshadowed using Tiresias in that way, but Oedipus was so into avoiding any confrontation with the truth at the beginning that he would respond calling Tiresias’ visions “absurdities” (494). Therefore, even though the truth has been revealed to him, Oedipus still chooses to remain blind to the truth in order to remain good in the eyes of his people.
Oedipus Rex is a play about the way we blind ourselves to painful truths that we can’t bear to see. Physical sight and blindness are used throughout the play, often ironically, as a metaphor for mental sight and blindness. The play ends with the hero Oedipus literally blinding himself to avoid seeing the result of his terrible fate. But as the play demonstrates, Oedipus, the man who killed his father and impregnated his mother, has been blind all along, and is partly responsible for his own blindness.
“Oedipus the King” contains many characters with differing characteristics. Some of these characteristics go hand-in-hand with the two main themes in the play.Tiresias and Oedipus in the play “Oedipus the King” are conflicting characters. These two characters illustrate the contrasting the differences of blindness & sight and knowledge & ignorance, and different interpretations of these ideas. The themes blindness & sight and knowledge & ignorance are similar in how they relate to each character.
“Oedipus Rex” was a Greek Tragedy written by Sophocles in the fifth century BC. It was the first of a trilogy of plays surrounding the life of Oedipus. Sophocles wrote over 120 plays approximately 100 years before Aristotle even defined a tragedy and the tragic hero. Aristotle’s definition of a tragedy is “… an imitation of an action of high importance, complete and of some amplitude; in language enhanced by distinct and varying beauties; acted not narrated; by means of pity and fear effecting its purgation of these emotions” (Kennedy and Gioa 2010). According to Aristotle there were six elements to a tragedy: the plot, the character, the