The TKs are classified as receptor and non receptor TKs. The receptor TKs, transducer signals from extracellular to the cytoplasm but the non RTKs are intracellular, it transmits intracellular signals (Pawson, 2002). For example the known RTKs of EGFR and platelet derived growth factor receptors (PDGFR) are monomers placed in the cell membrane. When the ligands were binding to their extracellular domain resulting RTKs are activated. The ligands of epidermal growth factor (EGF), platelet derived growth factor (PDGF) etc., are extracellular signal molecules that induce receptor dimerization except insulin receptor (IR). Ligand binding domain of the RTKs may contain disulphide bond that connects the extracellular and intracellular regions of …show more content…
Another way the cytoplasmic MAPK can be activated by some other cytoplasmic proteins, for example the stress-activated MAPK, p38, is phosphorylated by the cascade, which start in the inside cell membrane-bound TNF-receptor-associated factor 6 (TRAF6) and ended in phosphorylated p38 in the nucleus. This induces effects such as cell motility, inflammation, chromatin remodeling, osmoregulation and apoptosis (Johnson and Lapadat, 2002; Guicciardi and Gores, 2003).
Kinases mediated tumorogenesis in lung malignancies:
Normally in healthy cells, the protein kinases (PK) may act as proto-oncogenes or tumour suppressor. However, alteration in PKs may lead to development of cancer by several mechanisms, including the activation of cell multiply pathways, genomic instability, diminish of apoptotic pathways, the endorsement of angiogenesis and cell motility. Receptor and non receptor TKs are mostly deregulated in several types of cancer. EGFR is a transmembrane receptor kinase that is overexpressed or aberrantly activated in NSLC.
Davies et al. in 2005 screened 26 primary lung neoplasm and seven lung cancer cell lines for somatic mutation through the coding sequences of 518 protein kinases (f1.3 Mb of DNA per sample). From this they found 188 somatic mutations, of these 127 were missense mutation, 13 nonsense, six frameshift, one in-frame insertion, six splice site, and 35 synonymous
Optimal management of NSCLC now requires that tumours be screened for a certain range of predictive and prognostic biomarkers that help to predict sensitivity to targeted therapy and estimate prognosis respectively . For NSCLC, much of the work in the past years has been focussed on mutations of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and on the abnormal fusion of the anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) being inhibited successfully with EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) and crizotinib respectively. Targeted agents are now being rationally designed to inhibit particular mutations leading to a more streamlined clinical trial process. In this review, we will examine the major subtypes of driver mutations that have been identified in NSCLC and relevant targeted therapies available both now, and in the foreseeable future.
Crizotinib (PF-02341066) is a potent inhibitor of c-Met and ALK. Anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)-positive non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is a molecular subtype of NSCLC with at least 27 ALK-fusion variants identified. c-Met is the prototypic member of RTKs, which is the only known high-affinity receptor for hepatocyte growth factor (HGF). Binding of HGF to the c-Met results in receptor multimerization and phosphorylation of multiple tyrosine residues at the intracellular region.
The main focus of this article was to Crizotinib as an inhibitor for ALK-rearragements in the Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC). The drug was first developed because of the ability for a diagnostic fluorescent in situ hybridization assay to be used to detect ALK-rearranged NSCLC. Pfizer has developed this drug to inhibit ALK and MET in many cancers that are associated with mutations in these specific genes. It has recently been shown to have an effect against ROS1-rearragements in NSCLC. This article provided better insight on the heterogeneity between ALK and ROS1 rearrangements in different subtypes of NSCLC. There is also information in the research article that sheds light into the future developments for crizotinib for ALK-rearrangements and some diagnostic assays that can detect NSCLC. This drug is important to the future of cancer therapies because it targets a subtype to NSCLC and defines a molecular target for its effectiveness. It can broaden a field which involves personalized therapies
The G-protein receptor is coupled to a trimeric G protein and controls the effector protein. The receptors activate cytosolic or nuclear transcription via several pathways. They are involved in signal transduction pathways such as MAP kinase pathway. (Lodish et al.).
Protein kinases are enzymes that activate or inactivate other proteins, which is done by phosphorylation. Kinases are activated by attaching themselves to a cyclin, which is a protein that has cyclically fluctuating concentration in the cell (Cdks.) When these cyclins build up in the cell, the resulting MPF phosphorylates other proteins, overall initiating mitosis.
Advance downstream, changes in the tumor silencers TSC1 and TSC2 hyper initiate motioning by mTORC1 (Laplante and Sabatini 2012). This is a critical focus of P13K-Aktsignaling. Additionally, the Ras-ERK pathway is enacted by transformations in Ras, or its downstream target Raf, that reason constitutive initiation of these proteins or by inactivation of GTPase-actuating proteins (Holes, for example, NF1, that empower the hydrolysis of GTP bound to Ras, which prompt its inactivation (Cichowski,2001).
The epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) is the cell-surface receptor for extracellular protein ligands. EGFR family has four closely related receptor tyrosine kinases: EGFR (ErbB-1), HER2/c-neu, Her 3 and Her 4. Mutations affecting EGFR expression or activity could lead to cancer.
Ceritinib is a potent inhibitor of anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK), a tyrosine kinase involved in the pathogenesis of nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC). ALK gene abnormalities due to mutations or translocations may result in expression of oncogenic fusion proteins, that alter signaling, and expression and result in increased cellular proliferation and survival in tumors. The primary mechanism of
Our hypothesis that FLRT3 increases the binding affinity for FGF8 specific RTKs for PTC cells harboring mutations will be confirmed if the in vitro binding assay displays an intense band for FGF8 specific RTKs in comparison to in vitro environments not containing FLRT3. However, if there appears to be no difference, then it would appear that FLRT3 positively regulates FGF8 signaling not through protein-protein interactions. If leucine rich domain deletions of FLRT3 decreases ERK phosphorylation in vivo, then it would appear that this specific domain is involved in increasing MAPK activation. However, if there is no change in ERK phosphorylation in response to these truncations, then it would appear that FLRT3 does no increase MAPK activation via leucine rich domains. As a result, I would investigate its role with fibronectin in progressing PTC. If a domain deletion does appear to reduce ERK phosphorylation, then I would perform mutate specific leucine residues to glutamine in that indicated domain. I would then infect PTC cells harboring mutations with the created leucine to glutamine mutated FLRT3 and immunoblot lysates for p-ERK in order to determine the specific residues responsible for increasing MAPK activation. Overall, if FLRT3 expression does appear to show increased MAPK activation, then it would be interesting to determine exactly how
Tumor suppressor gene tells the when to die, repair the mistakes made in the DNA, and slow down cell division. If a tumor suppressor gene gets mutated the cells will grow out of control with nothing to stop them. The mutation can be caused when this gene isn’t activated. Two common example of a tumor suppressor are the p53 and NF1. Proto oncogenes codes for protein which helps with the cell cycle, prevents differentiation in cell, and programs cell death. If a proto oncogenes gets mutated there would be change in the protein sequence which would interfere normal cell regulations. The name of the proto oncogene was oncogene. DNA repair identifies incorrections and damages and fixes them. These three genes are mostly used to find cancer because
The Catalogue of Somatic Mutations in Cancer (COSMIC) is a comprehensive analysis of known mutational signatures across 40 distinct cancers in humans created by the mass collection of published peer-reviewed scientific journal articles (“Signatures of Mutational Process in Human Cancer”, 2016). Compared to nonsmokers, smokers had higher rates of mutational signatures 2, 4, 5, 13 and 16. Signature 4 is associated with lung, head, neck, and liver cancer and is characterized by C to A mutation substitutions. This signature was found in cancer tissue that had direct CS exposure, except for the liver (which is not directly exposed), however the signature was still elevated in comparison to nonsmokers (Alexandrov, et al., 2016). Signatures 2 and 13 are often associated with cervical and bladder cancers and are usually seen together. These signatures cause C to T and C to G mutations, respectively. Both signatures are also associated with the activation of APOBEC deaminases, likely due in response to inflammation in the presence of tobacco smoke (Alexandrov, et al., 2016). Signature 5 is present in all cancers, even those unrelated to tobacco, and is typically associated with aging and T to C mutations. It is unclear what directly causes the appearance of this signature, however levels were elevated in comparison to nonsmokers (Ehrenberg, 2016). Signature 16 is seen in liver cancer tissues and is characterized by T to C substitutions. Again, there were elevated levels of
Dephosphorylation of Ser535 activates eIF2B [53]. Currently, the mechanism of the activation is unknown. It is thought that dephosphorylated eIF2B undergoes a conformational change, enabling GDP-GTP exchange and eIF2B dissociation from eIF2 even in the presence of phosphorylated alpha subunit [51, 53]. Therefore, a balance between the phosphorylating and dephosphorylating reactions determines the activity of eIF2B. GSK-3 is the major kinase phosphorylating Ser535 and negatively regulating eIF2B [54, 55]. GSK-3 is constitutively active but negatively regulated by Akt. The foregoing allows us to suggest the way that LNCaP cells can escape the translation inhibition caused by p-eIF2α. As already mentioned, LNCaP cells are characterized by abnormally active Akt and, accordingly, inactive p-GSK-3, so the latter is not able to phosphorylate eIF2B. This can shift the equilibrium between eIF2B and p-eIF2B toward the active dephosphorylated eIF2B, allowing bypass of the translational checkpoint implemented by p-eIF2α. This assumption is consistent with our results, showing that Tet inhibited Akt and thus activated GSK-3, contributing to the inactivation of eIF2B and inhibition of mRNA translation in LNCaP cells. Our results obtained with LNCaP cells are in agreement with the results obtained with human colon carcinoma HT-29 [46]. In these cells, Tet inhibited Akt and activated GSK-3β. The upregulation of GSK-3β in HT-29 cells induced degradation of cyclin D1 and
There are three kinases involved in the MAPK phosphorelay system which act in series: MAPK kinase kinase (MKKK), MAP kinase (MKK) and MAPK (JNK), which respond to external stimuli, shown in Figure 1 (Johnson et al, 2005). There are a wide range of stimuli that can activate regulation of JNK including ultraviolet irradiation, growth factors (tumour necrosis factor-), cytokines and even protein synthesis inhibitors (anisomycin) activates MKKK and using phosphorylation to activate the next kinase in the process, MKK, which in turn phosphorylates MAPK (Dérijard et al, 1994; Kallunki et al, 1994; Lange-Carter et al, 1993). There are 13 different MKKK including MEKK1-4, MLK2/3 and DLK that can act in the JNK pathway which provides the ability to responds these different external signals (Brown and Sacks, 2009; Dérijard et al, 1994; Johnson and Lapadat, 2002; Kallunki et al, 1994). In the sequence of MEKK there are specific motifs
The main thing I am trying to say here is that when tumor suppressor genes and proto-oncogenes do not do what they are required to do, the cancer begins to form, all
Specific aims: EGFR and c-Met are receptor tyrosine kinases (RTKs), and tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) against these receptors have been initially effective when prescribed to patients in combination with traditional chemotherapy or radiation. However, the overall efficacy of TKIs is limited due to the development of resistance as seen through clinical trials in NSCLC. Epithelial Mesenchymal Transition (EMT) is a process by which epithelial cells undergo phenotypic and morphological changes to acquire mesenchymal characteristics including increased motility and invasiveness. Currently, the role of EMT in TKI drug resistance is poorly understood. EMT results in loss of tight junction proteins such as E-cadherin and upregulation of transcriptional repressors of these proteins such as ZEB1. Recently, protein arginine methyl transferase 1 (PRMT1) has been shown to be an important regulator of EMT, cancer cell migration and metastasis. However, the role of PRMT1 in TKI resistance is not known. In this study, we propose to evaluate the role of EMT proteins in TKI resistance using H2170 and H358 cell lines (wild type EGFR) that were made resistant to an EGFR inhibitor, erlotinib and a c-Met inhibitor, SU11274 and a combination of both. H3255 cell line (with L858R EGFR mutation), and H1975 cell line with L858R and T790M EGFR mutations which we have made resistant to erlotinib will also be used. Our recent in vitro studies indicate that TKI resistance may be due to the activation