Officer Jim Argumentative Essay

In 1760, when George III was made kind of England, he saw that Britain are in debt because of the seven years’ war, he decided to make a way out by making the colonies be part of the payment. Likewise, he increases the taxes and make sure they did not enough partner to trade with so that they can gain more profits. To the people in the colonies they felt it was a cheat and violation of “Navigation Act” (Foner 186). Just because they did not have a representative in the parliament. In 1761, James Otis was a lawyer, who stood against the writs of assistance to combat smuggling (Foner 186). The writs were a search houses if there is an evidence of smuggling goods. In addition, some people who do not support the stamp Act oppose it and differentiate between “internal taxes” from the stamp duty, brought about the idea that the parliament do not have the right to impose any thing on them or their trade. Above all, they do not have right to tax American since they do not have

Deputy Derek Geer was shot and killed on the job after 15 years of selfless serving his beloved community of the Mesa County Sherriff’s Department. Geer was only 40 when the unfortunate event occurred in February of 2016 in Denver. He was on the job responding to a call of an armed man with fellow officers. The situation escalated and the man pulled out a firearm shooting and killing Deputy Geer. 48 hours after the Navy-veteran’s death his organs were donated and he got to save life’s even though he had lost his.

The defendant, Jim through his lawyer, has the right to appeal for another hearing of his case in a supreme court. When a state court decision is not satisfactory to the defendant because of lack of reasonable explanation, the defendant can ask for clarification for the decision made. The search and seizure of illegal drugs in Mr. Jim’s house was by nature illegal. To begin with the officers were acting on an invalid search warrant which is a violation of the Fourth Amendment, and a police misconduct. The Fourth Amendment was implemented to guard the citizen's privacy rights and restricts the police against unreasonable searches and seizures. For this reason, the drugs seized at Jim’s house should not be used as evidence to convict him. Jim

Teagle 170 P.3d 266 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2007), defendant Teagle was pulled over after being observed speeding down the highway. When the officer approached the vehicle, he noticed two cellular phones on the dashboard, an open container of liquor, fast-food wrappers, a box of cookies, a map, and luggage and clothing in the backseat. The officer gave the defendant a warning and then asked him if there was any contraband in the vehicle or whether there was a chance anyone else could have placed any contraband in the vehicle. Although the defendant answered in the negative, the officer returned to his patrol vehicle and asked if there was a canine unit available. There was not and so the officer told the defendant that he was free to leave. Shortly afterwards, the officer saw the defendant speeding once again down the road. The officer proceeded to pull him over and gave him another warning. The officer again asked him if he could search the vehicle and the defendant answered in the affirmative. The officer called a canine unit which arrived an hour later. The canine, in proceeding to do an exterior sniff, circled around to the trunk. The officers then opened the trunk to find 338 pounds of marijuana, a can of air freshener under the driver’s seat and several toilet bowl sanitizers in the compartment ofthe vehicle as well as the trunk. These were all indicative of an attempt to mask the smell of marijuana. At trial, the defendant argued that he had taken his vehicle to a repair shop, implying that someone else had placed the drugs in the car. The court found that there was enough evidence, including the large amount of drugs in the trunk of the vehicle, the air freshener, and the inconsistent statements to determine that the defendant had sufficient knowledge of the marijuana in the

It is no surprise that recently there has been controversy on the issue of police force. So many people have been taken from their families over something that could have been prevented without taking it as far as killing. From Michael Brown to Walter Scott it just doesn’t stop. Thankfully, for some of these incidents a witness has caught Officers using excessive force. But others, you just get to hear the Officers side of the story since the other person isn’t alive to tell their side to what happened. Which is definitely not enough. There needs to be a legitimate system where we can see everything that happens start to finish when excessive force is the case. Organizations such as the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) are demanding for

FACTS: In Lexington, Kentucky officers were suspicious of a subject who was suspected to be a drug dealer. The officer initiated an observance of the subject’s movements and followed the subject to an apartment where the odor of marijuana was admitting. The officers made their presence known and immediately heard sounds that the believed were indications that the subject was destroying possible evidence. The officers knocked and explained they were making entry into the room. The officers forcefully enter the apartment and observed the primary subject, additional subjects, and drugs including paraphernalia in the open. The subject was brought to The Circuit Court where the court denied the motion of the defense team to remove the evidence from the case based on the entry of the officers being unjust due to not having a proper search warrant. The defense team entered a guilty plea to obtain the authorization to appeal The Circuit Courts ruling. The Kentucky Court of Appeals affirmed this request which prompted The Supreme Court of Kentucky to reverse the decision. This action was based on the courts assumption that additional exigent circumstances did exist however, it did not proved the officers the proper authorization to conduct a

The first witness who will testify for the prosecution is Officer Bobby Flanegan. This witness will demonstrate that the warrantless search of the defendant’s apartment and backyard was proper. Officer Flanegan will also provide evidence to show that exigent circumstances were present, such as the possibility of a weapon in the possession of the defendant. For example, there was a possibility that gravity knife was in Kelly Robert’s possession at the corner of Chippewa and Franklin. Officer Flanegan will also provide evidence the seizure of the pills in the backyard were for the safety of the children in the daycare center next door. As shown, the hole in the fence that separated the daycare center’s property from that of Kelly Roberts’ demonstrated

Facts: Defendant Wardlow was seen holding a “opague bag”by Officer Nolan. Officer Nolan was driving with fours car, his being the last one. The cars were in a “heavy narcotics trafficking area” examining the area for “drug transactions.” Wardlow saw the police cars and fled the area, even though Wardlow was not doing anything “suspicious.” Officer Nolan seeing the defendant flee, chased and caught the defenfent. When caught officer Nolan did a “protective pat down search for weapons.” Officer Nolan looked at the bag, opened it and found a gun. Wardlow was then arrested by Officer Nolan. Wardlow’s attorney filed a “motion to suppress” the gun, under the action of an “lawful stop and frisk.” The motion was denied by The Illinois Trial Court.

On 25 March 2017, at 0220 hours in the City of Goddard, Officer Tabor was traveling Westbound at the 20000 block of West Kellogg in his patrol vehicle. As he approached 20300 West Kellogg, he decided that he would check the business lot. While slowing his vehicle and maneuvering it into the right hand turn lane, he visually saw a small sized SUV type vehicle facing South at the stop sign of Main Street and West Kellogg. While executing his right hand turn, Officer Tabor's headlights shined onto the driver's side and front interior of the vehicle stopped at the stop sign. This facilitated Officer Tabor to visually see that the driver was not wearing their safety belt and was instead leaned over the center console, presumebly looking at the cellular phone being held by the front seat passenger.

Wet Beaver Creek offers great views of Sedona’s red rocks, cliff jumping for the adrenaline junky, and prime creek-side real estate for the observer.

A lot of things can happen in the span of five minutes, and that showed true for the five minutes between when Booth entered the box and when he executed the final blow. Booth, after gaining permission, slipped quietly into the box and blockaded the door behind him. Earlier that day Booth had stashed a wooden music stand in the box for just that purpose. Booth then turned, waited, and watched the President for nearly four minutes. Sitting in his pocket was a .44 caliber, single-shot, muzzle loading percussion cap pistol and a knife. The handgun was his weapon of choice but if something went wrong, such as a misfire, the knife was there as a backup. Around 10:15 Booth decided to strike. The took out his handgun and walked closer to the President

The New York Police Department would be the first people to call if you are in any trouble or might be in danger. Every time you would think of the NYPD, the first thing that comes to mind is that when you are in danger or something illegal is happening, they would be the ones to help you and solve the situation. When you think of the NYPD and these things come to mind, it would be the surprise that anyone would get when they see that someone of the NYPD has committed a crime. NYPD Sergeant Alberto Randazzo was arrested on child porn charges and also found that he would tell women through skype to perform sexual acts on young children. There were videos found of the actions that had taken place and what was identified as the NYPD sergeant

I agree with you that, according to the scenarios given for this weeks post, Sergeant Hunter was unfortunately in a “pretty sticky situation.” That being said, although I do believe that the Collaboration method would produce some form of results, in my personal opinion I do not believe it would result in the correct solution. To better explain, Captain Webb used the power of his rank to make Sergeant Hunter’s working conditions awful. This especial for an officer of the law is by no means acceptable. Captain Webb needs to made completely aware that he is not to abuse his rank no matter the situation. Pursuing this matter further, do however concur with your statement that Third-party Intervention would be a viable option. In my personal

THE Footstool LIEUTENANT is the primary film to investigate the eastern front of World War I, and recounts the narrative of a wonderful, solid willed lady (Hera Hilmar), who, baffled by continuous foul play at home, leaves the Assembled States in the wake of meeting Jude, an American specialist (Josh Hartnett) who runs a remote therapeutic mission inside the Hassock Realm - a world both outlandish and perilous, and on the precarious edge of what is going to wind up noticeably the main World War. Watch movie online. There, she discovers her steadfastness to Jude and the mission's originator, (Ben Kingsley) tried when she becomes hopelessly enamored with a lieutenant in the Stool Royal Armed force (Michiel Huisman). Free movies Presently, with attacking

The code had not been used in a few months so it was on the dormant code list. (I was not aware of this list)