Officer Taylor's Decision-Making Case Study

Portions of the population may perceive the police to be oppressors. In addition, there is a perception that victims of police brutality often belong to relatively powerless groups, such as minorities, the disabled, the young, and the poor.[6]

The threat of danger is continuously present, which contributes to the officer’s constant suspicion in trying to identify a potential danger or a law being broken (Skolnick, p. 4). Because of this constant mode of thinking, many people find themselves not wanting to establish a social relationship or friendship with police officers. The danger element isolates the police officer from citizens that he finds representative of danger as well as isolating him from the more predictable people that he might ordinarily identify with (Skolnick, p. 4).

Studies of policing support this as they show that police are more likely to stop and search or arrest men from working class backgrounds or ethnic minorities as they believe that there behaviour is ‘suspicious’, again showing how social control agents label. Interactions say that this is because the police have an idea of what a typical criminal looks like, and these things fit that idea. By the police labelling them they may create self fulfilling prophecies in which case labelling these people in the first place would be creating more crime and deviance.

There are numerous concerns based on the quantity and content of stop and searches which are often influenced by institutionalised racism (Home Office, 1997). Studies suggested that the police maintain a belief that black people are prone to be involved in violent crimes (Reiner, 1989). Therefore leading to black individuals routinely falling victim to police stereotypes and overgeneralisations (Bowling and Phillips, 2007). Police interviews have suggested that police perceive certain ethnicities to be involved with certain crimes, one interview suggested that if police are alerted of a robbery, 90% of the time they will assume it is involving a black individual (Quinton et al, 2000). Despite that there is evidence suggesting that racial disadvantages will cause an increase in young blacks to be involved with crime, suggesting that these suspicions are justified (Waddington et al, 2007). Furthermore, there is little research suggesting that police enforce their prejudices when working on the streets, thus suggesting that racial views are a result of police canteen sub-culture (Waddington, 1999).

The practices of police can best be explained in the elaboration of case probability versus class probability. Case probability is when police take specific evidence with concrete proof in regards to the victim of a crime to accuse one of a crime. Class probability, however, is when police generalize normal committers of the specific crime to accuse one for it. For example, if police aimed to prosecute a seller of marijuana and Hispanics were typically known to commit such a crime, class probability would be integrated into case investigation if police searched every Hispanic on site for the

Most decisions are made with analysis, but some are judgment calls not susceptible to analysis due to time or information constraints. Please write about a judgment call you’ve made recently that couldn’t be analyzed. It can be a big or small one, but should focus on a business issue. What was the situation, the alternatives you considered and evaluated, and your decision making process? Be sure to explain why you chose the alternative you did relative to others considered.

The police __________ is an extreme version of a phenomenon that exists in many human groups.

They relate directly to people of all races in an attempt of maintaining law and order. However, the Police Officers believe that the people of a certain race are likely to commit more crimes than people from other races. This shows that their investigations are focused in the neighborhoods where certain races reside. The Police officers usually patrol the area where they believe there might be criminals. Some officers also do not arrest or consider other people just because of what race they belong to. In many time, crimes have been associated to the non-whites in the United States (Correll et al., 2014). Many of the resources of police departments are not equally distributed to people of all races. The cops are encouraged to observe people from poor backgrounds and the neighborhoods which are associated with crime. These people who reside in these neighborhoods are perceived as criminals. Many police officers patrol in these areas which are perceived as crime areas and a vast majority of the arrests and actions they take end up influencing unequal amounts of racial disparity. (Correll et al., 2014).

When Encinia arrived to Bland’s vehicle Encinia asked Bland for her licence and insurance. Once Encinia finished running Bland’s information he returned to her vehicle writing her a citation for failing to signal. Bland was already irritated at the fact how Encinia according to her was speeding behind her, and tailing her, then pulled her over and wrote her a citation.

1. Did officer Smith have reasonable suspicion to make the initial stop of this vehicle?

V1 and V2 both stoped in red light on the right turning lane of Renassiance West. V1 did not see V2 still stopped in red light and struck V2 from behind. Both vehicle had no apparent damages. The crash is non reportable at this time. Both parties exchanged information to resolve the matter among themselves at this time. V1 is at fault for this crash.

Officer Billstein is maturing as an officer. His decision making is greatly improved. Officer Billstein no longer rushes to judgment and he makes informed and thoughtful decisions. Officer Billstein is able to take a step back and analyze the information he obtains during investigations, which leads to sound judgments.

Role schema, which is the cognitive structure that organizes one’s knowledge about appropriate behaviors, tells the audience that the police officer initial purpose was to help Chris and Rose. The role and expectations associated with these categories are commonly referred to as stereotypes – mental representations of social groups and their members that are widely shared. (Hamilton & Sherman, 1994; Macrae, Stangor & Hewstone, 1996; and Stangor & Lange, 1994). Expectations from our memory tell us how police officers are to act through real life situations we experience and from what we are taught. We then make inferences and judge whether the officer is acting “correct” based upon these experiences and teachings. The term ‘correct’ is subjective, and define differently from out group members to stigmatized group members. Police officers’ purpose is to protect and serve civilians; however, social expectation theory challenges the role schema of police.

The Military Decision Making Process (MDMP) is a decision-making model to assist military members in making sound military decisions and to compile operation orders. This paper will describe MDMP and apply it to a recent job-related decision of the author; preparation for a combat logistics patrol (CLP) while deployed in Iraq. The paper will identify the steps in the model and describe how critical thinking impacted the decision.

The rational decision-making model describes a series of steps that decision makers should consider if their goal is to maximize the quality of their outcome. In other words, if you want to make sure that you make the best choice, going through the formal steps of the rational decision-making model may make sense. The following are the steps taken to come to a rational decision: 1. Identify the problem, 2. Establish decision criteria, 3. Weigh decision criteria, 4. Generate alternatives, 5. Evaluate the alternative, 6. Choose the best alternative, 7. Implement the decision, 8. Evaluate the decision.