Olmstread, Blick And Mills's View On Forgiveness

By definition, to forgive is to accept and let go of the offences done against one, and by doing so, be able to remember them without rancor. In other words, the man thought to be forgiving is one who does not totally forgets the wrongs committed against him (because that is a quite impossible action). In reality, the forgiving man is one who is able to recall all those wrongs, and still be at peace with himself and with the offender in question. This activity is quite difficult to do, namely because in order to truly forgive, one must have strong convictions. This can be understood better if we consider how easier it is to hate a person for something he or she did to one, instead of absolving he or she of all fault and consequently accepting to love the person after the wrong committed. Therefore, the moral virtue of forgiveness becomes easier when the determination of giving second chances becomes a habit.

Forgiveness research has greatly increased over the past several decades, but certain aspects are given less attention than others. There are many studies on forgiveness and religion, including studies that discuss why devoutly religious individuals are often more likely to offer forgiveness and what specific aspects of religion impact this. There is also a lot of research done on cheap forgiveness amongst different religious groups; Its prevalence as well as the negative health effects of this cheap reconciliation. However, it is important to analyze these concepts alongside each other, as well as looking at different stages of life, specifically amongst college-age young adults. Forgiveness amongst college students deserves more attention

The cornerstone of the Christian faith is that of forgiveness. Forgiveness is an area in our lives that many of us can struggle with simply because we have to overcome our own pain and suffering that another person has inflicted on us. It also may be believes by many that forgiveness is to forget or condone the person for what they did but, according to the article, “To forgive is to offer mercy to someone who has acted unjustly and then be able to look at the person who violated us and give them mercy.”(Enright & Magnusin, 2008, p. 114)

EXEGESIS PAPER PSALMS 32 Forgiveness is a statement of God’s love that is established through Christians who desire to live a life of obedience in Christ.

Journal Article Review: Intervention Studies on Forgiveness: A Meta-Analysis Summary The motivation and tendency of people to forgive others remains an important topic of discussion. In today’s society most people at some period have experienced feeling of un forgiveness towards friend, or relatives. “Forgiveness was defined as the ability to relinquish of resentment towards others” (Baskin & Enright, 2004, p. 80).

What truly constitutes forgiveness? Forgiveness has a different context depending on where the person is from or what he believes. Religion places a great emphasis on the view of forgiveness.

“Forgiveness, assert Fincham and his colleagues, can help restore more benevolent and cooperative goals to relationships” Everett L. Worthington, Jr.(2004). New Science of Forgiveness.

Forgiveness is a voluntary process and only time can heal all wounds. Scratch that- time won’t heal all wounds and forgiving someone is totally and completely up to you. When stating that forgiveness is “voluntary,” it simply means that one is forgiving someone at their own free will. The question is “why? why must we forgive someone after doing something so awful?” The answer might be complex. In the book “Picking Cotton” by Jennifer Thompson-Cannino, Ronald Cotton and Erin Torneo, and in the book “Beauty for Ashes” written by Joyce Meyer, forgiveness is portrayed as a big role. Each person goes through their own struggles and eventually has to forgive someone or be forgiven by someone.

Forgiveness is what holds and brings relationships together. If you stay angry for long, your heart stubbornly hardens. But if you choose to forgive, you will be filled with the grace of God. We are all sinners and should never carry a

 Counseling article review: Hall, Julie & Fincham, Frank D. (2005). Self-forgiveness: The stepchild of forgiveness research. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 24 (5): 621-637 Summary The article "Self-forgiveness: The forgotten stepchild of forgiveness research" is a qualitative rather than a quantitative study of the phenomenon of self-forgiveness. The authors distinguish

This in turn leads to the idea in which forgiveness is a cancellation of a debt and the offended party no longer expects repayment for the pain caused (Pettigrove, 2012). Additionally, forgiveness is the release of bitterness or anger as an effect of an apparent offense while ceasing to demand punishment (Pettigrove, 2012). Furthermore, it begins by accepting what has happened and choosing to let go by making a decision to forgive and love the offender by canceling the debt (Pettigrove, 2012). Likewise, it releases judgement as well as thoughts of revenge or ill-will to the one who caused harm while resuming some form of a relationship with those who caused the hardship (Pettigrove, 2012). What is more, it is taking the responsibility for one’s own feelings while taking back control of one’s life instead of allowing those feelings complete control (Pettigrove, 2012). Finally, it allows God the room to move and work within our lives as He begins to heal the brokenness.

In Shiver’s article, A Bridge Across Abysses of Revenge, he claims that for forgiveness in politics to occur the past must not be forgotten. He states, “Citizens must cope with the injustices that have divided them before they contract for a justice that will unite them” (Helmick, & Petersen, 2001, p. 155). Shiver makes his point by discussing the different approaches to how nations have dealt with war crimes and massacres, and great injustices from the past, such as Americas denial of the “No Gun Ri Massacre” that occurred in South Korea in 1950. In his article, Shiver compares America’s tendency to deny and/or forget the past to Germany’s ability to embrace their mistakes and in return find true forgiveness and reconciliation. He encourages

Results showed that participants did not verbalize their forgiveness. This research found that making the decision to forgive someone depended on whether the situation was caused within a family relation. These results assist in the comprehension of imparting forgiveness in non-voluntary relations extends our viewpoint on the complex way of families. Further research should be investigated based on verbal and non-verbal acts of forgiveness. Research was done so that we could better understand the discourse in a relationship due to lack of forgiveness. The research is also applied so that a better understanding of how forgiveness can be negotiated between participants. The goal of the research was to understand the cause of family problems. The research applies relational dialectic theory to help family members create long lasting relationships by explicitly giving forgiveness in the relationship within the family. After the study was complete, the researchers found that the participants honor commitment to having a relationship in the family. The researchers also found that the ability to verbally forgive is a decisive action and an intentional

The encouragement of forgiveness in one way or another is a universal concept of the Christian religion. However, cultural dispositions of forgiveness are cultivated differently for blacks and whites in America. The message of forgiveness within the context of catastrophic violence and loss is emphatically expressed in Black churches all across America. An example of this message includes the Sunday school lesson called, “A Love That Forgives”, prepared for students at the 16th Street Baptist Church in Birmingham, Al on September 15, 1963. Ironically, that same day there was a racial bombing, killing four little girls. Reverend Martin Luther King, who conducted a speech before the burial of the four little girls said, "We must develop and

In general, self-forgiveness is identified by a common ability to exhibit self-respect in spite of the acceptance of wrong-doing (Hall, J., Fincham, D., 2005). I never considered the distinction between interpersonal forgiveness and intrapersonal forgiveness. While they share many similarities, there is even greater evidence of the differences between the two. One significant difference involves the consequences of withholding forgiveness from self. It is likely that intrapersonal unforgiveness can be much more detrimental than interpersonal. Hall & Fincham state “ Self-forgiveness often entails a resolution to change” (2005). It is this process of acceptance of one’s own imperfections and sinful nature that catapults a desire for self-improvement and growth. This is a critical component of healing the soul and beginning the journey to spiritual and mental health. Also enlightening was the declaration that one can experience pseudo self forgiveness by failing to acknowledge any wrong doing and convincing him/herself that they are without fault. Finally, I was struck by the notion that self-forgiveness will typically