Omnivore's Dilemma Ethos Pathos Logos

In order to have a intriguing and convincing argument you must be able to incorporate rhetoric tenets into your work. Fast Food Nation: The Dark Side of the All-American Meal is a book based on the fast food industry on how fast food came to be and how Americans and our society are greatly involved. Eric Schlosser the author of Fast Food Nation pulls you into his book with the effective use of the three rhetoric tenets ethos, pathos, and logos. Schlosser doles out to enlighten his readers on harming effect the fast food industry has on us,when most people are ignorant to the idea.

The answers Pollan offers to the seemingly straightforward question posed by this book have profound political, economic, psychological, and even moral implications for all of us. Beautifully written and thrillingly argued, The Omnivore’s Dilemma promises to change the

American agriculture can produce more food on less land and at cheaper cost than any other nation. Did anyone ever wonder why or how? The documentary Food Inc., produced by Robert Kenner, is designed to put the spotlight on the unsafe preparation of food products, the inhuman treatment of animals being used, and the unethical treatment of workers in corporate farming. Robert Kenner uses multiple rhetorical analysis to get his aspect across to his viewers. Throughout the movie, there are several claims to appeal of ethos, pathos, and logos in order to uncover the true secrets of the American food during its journey to the table.

In addition to his solutions, Pollan’s modern narrative sheds light on the façade of our food industries; asking us to rethink what we know. Despite the mention of certain inhumane acts in All Animals are Equal, Pollan takes us one step further to uncover the reason for which we continue to purchase our corrupt food. We all know animal abuse exists, but the average consumer like myself is more worried about the best price and the fastest way to get a burger rather than how fairly the animals are treated in the process. Whether it be the confined living space of chickens or the mental and physical torture of pigs, we continue to blind ourselves from reality. Is it purely out of selfishness? Or are we too ignorant to come to terms with our wrong doings? Like Pollan explains, it takes seeing the abuse before the shame of our disrespect can be felt (pg.6). After seeing Pollan’s truth, I might now think twice before eating out and the choice to support organic produce can make a dramatic difference for those farmers who promote the ethical lifestyle.

In my first year of college I have been introduced to copious amounts of new information and topics that had never crossed my mind. Becoming familiar with new ideas, food production and it’s impacts of the environment both locally and globally became of interest to me. I have been a vegetarian for about four years and as I have attended college I have learned more about the state of the issue with food production and sustainability. When presented with the list of books for our independent project Omnivore 's Dilemma immediately jumped at me. When Pollan stated in the introduction, “Farming and food industry produces even more greenhouse gases than all forms of transportation put together; the way you eat affects the world more than anything else you do,” I was hooked.

What am I exactly eating? Where does our food come from? Why should I care? “The Omnivore’s Dilemma” may forever change the way you think about food. I enjoyed Mr. Pollan’s book, “The Omnivore’s Dilemma” and learned a great deal of information. Pollan’s book is a plea for us to stop and think for a moment about our whole process of eating. Pollan sets out to corn fields and natural farms, goes hunting and foraging, all in the name of coming to terms with where food really comes from in modern America and what the ramifications are for the eaters, the eaten, the economy and the environment. The results are far more than I expected them to be.

In “The Way of All Flesh” the author Ted Conover describes his experience working as an undercover USDA inspector in a meat packing plant. He shows how extremely grotesque the industry really is by providing numerous examples on the health and treatment of animals, the conditions of the meat, and the health and treatment of the employees. Conover shows the reader what it is really like in the slaughterhouse by using descriptive language. Throughout the article Conover brings up the treatment and the conditions the animals are put in. Conover supports his arguments by appealing to the reader’s emotions, by making the readers feel sympathetic for both the animals and workers.

In the debate presented by Intelligence Squared, Don’t eat anything with a face, professor Naal Bernard and lectern Gene Bauer argue for this movement. Oppose to the movement are Chris Masterjohn and Joel Salatin. During the debate, each speaker takes the time to present their side of the argument and provide counters to statements made by the conflicting party. Although each speaker utilized logos, pathos and ethos, the speakers who argued for the consumption of meat had the most masterfully crafted arguments and fashioned a more effective standpoint in the debate. Of the rhetorical devices used by the pro-meat party, the most prevalent and effective was that of logos, or logic.

The Rhetorical Analysis of the “Against Meat” by Jonathan Safran Foer People argue about ethical and health issues of the meat consumption for decades. Many individuals have own stories of how they came to the vegetarianism or its versions. Jonathan Safran Foer is one of them. In the article Against Meat the man describes his personal experience of the meat consumption and factors that made him to abandon this type of meals. Foer also raises an issue about the attitude to the food.

The Omnivore’s Dilemma Summary The main idea of The Omnivore’s Dilemma, by Michael Pollan, is to make the reader aware of where his food comes from, and what goes into his food. Pollan does this by breaking the book into four different types of meals: the industrial and processed meal consisting of food produced in factories or grown on large-scale farms, the organic meal created on industrial farms, the “grass fed” meal made of meat and produce created on mindful and smaller farms, and finally the meal containing food gathered, hunted, or grown by the person who will consume it. Pollan starts by explaining the origin of corn in Mexico and southwestern North America.

How well do you know about the food you eat? Why is it so hard to choose what to eat and what to buy? Modern people can barely make choices about what is good to eat and buy unless following the expert’s advises. However, there is one man, Michael Pollan, wrote “Omnivore’s Dilemma: A Natural History of Four Meals”, published in 2006, and he wants to persuade general public to rethink their food choices and relation with food, and provoke their awareness of eating. Pollan builds up his credibility by approaching the question through various perspectives, and by critically analyzing the issue of eating disorder. To illustrate his claims, Pollan explains his key words of his work via his narratives. He, however, does not figure out any practicable solutions to deal with the omnivore’s dilemma.

Introduction of topic: I know from the survey that most people don’t believe in giving up meat and I also know that trying to guilt people into not eating meat by showing sad pictures of factory farming doesn’t work. However, giving up meat for even

Food Inc., a documentary film produced by Robert Kenner that was based of Eric Schlosser book, Fast Food Nation and Michael Pollan book, The Omnivore’s Dilemma, is designed to inform people by exposing the inhumane policies and techniques within the food industry. The documentary aims to bring spotlight on the reality of the food industry rather than what is portrayed through advertisement. In doing so, the film shows where it all begins in slaughterhouses as animals are raised only to be smash to death or processed in unsanitary conditions, while also including stories from farmers, government officials and victims who suffered from the food industry. The main intended audience is American people in general to warn them of the sinister side of the food industry.

In “Animal, Vegetable, Miserable,” Gary Steiner argues against the eating, or using, of animals and animal products. Steiner is the author of multiple books on topics similar to this, and a dedicated vegan of fifteen years at the time of this article. The author begins with an allusion to the recent outcries for the humane treatment of animals being raised for food. However, he points out, no one seems to be concerned about the animals being slaughtered, merely that they were not abused beforehand. Steiner then goes on to explain the two main

“Against Meat”, is an anecdotal writing by Jonathan Safran Foer discussing events of his life as a vegetarian. Foer writes about his life around food, more specifically his relationship with meat and the encounters he runs in to facing meat and food. To develop a thorough message with readers, Foer uses a variety of literary devices. Moreover, Foer's writing creates a relationship with the reader by using appropriate prose and diction.