On Punishment Teen Khillers Analysis

In the article “ On Punishment and Teen Killers” written by Jennifer Jenkins, believes that teens who commit crimes should go to prison. Jennifer Jenkins's argument holds fewer ethos assertions because she uses more logic and reasoning, and pathos. She claims a teenager reported to his friend, who testified at his trial, that he just wanted“ to see what it was like to shoot someone”(2). In her assertion she uses more pathos to generate an emotional response rather than ethos. Jennifer Jenkins describes how their are no adequate words to describe what this kind of loss does to the victim's family rather than being ethical.

In the article “Can Violent Criminals Help Troubled Teens?” By Kristin Lewis was it a good idea or bad idea that teens spend a day learning in a jail cell. To start with, people think that it was a bad idea to sent teens to learn and spend a day with prisoners from jail. As a result, “teens shouldn't’t stay a day at a prison to learn because some prisoner did something mean to Sahn and teens wouldn't’t want that to happen to them.” Also, the teens would get sick, hurt or embarrass. Furthermore, “teens don’t want to be taunted, harassed and intimidated by the prisoners that are behind bars.” To emphasize, a prisoner would be executed and that is not pretty for teens to see. For this reason, “teens are taken to the death row, where nearly 700

In this summary response we are summarizing the article “On Punishment and Teen Killers”. In this article Jennifer Jenkins talks about her sister’s experience and how it was caused by a teenager. And what she is basically trying to make a claim on how teens do deserve to go to life sentences. But yet she does not have any experience since she is just a teacher.

In the article “On Punishment and Teen Killers” by Jennifer Jenkins asserts that teens are becoming more violent and starting commit more crimes because of the national television they watch.Jenkins tells the reader about “JLWOP” (Juvenile Life Without Parole) and how kids are being sentenced to life in prison without parole.Some people are trying to advocate to minimize the offender culpability because of their age.While kids are getting sentenced to life without parole, this disproves juvenile advocates reliance on the undeveloped brain.Some juvenile offenders truly understand what the victim family go through and how long it takes them to recover.There were millions of dollars spent to end JLWOP and to set convicted murderers free.

They are many different article that talk about teen killers but Garinger is the most accountable in her work and uses the most and best ethos. She wrote the paper called “Juveniles Don’t Deserve Life Sentences.” In her write she argues about how kids are just kids and don’t have a fully developed brain. They don’t deserve to be given a adult sentence and deserve to have a second chance to have a life of no crimes. One step she uses to make us think that she is credible is the way she uses how teens are just tempted by other to do something they shouldn’t. “Peer pressure also makes them promising candidates for rehabilitation”(8). This use of works makes the reader feel that if they are peer pressured to do something then maybe the tens deserve

Garinger was a former juvenile court judge, so Garinger is a very credible source when it comes to the topic of juvenile criminals. To support Garinger’s credible usage of ethos, he demonstrates that in 2005, Supreme Court acknowledged that even though juveniles have committed terrible crimes such as homicide “juvenile offenders cannot with reliability be classified among the worst offenders” (6). This technique of providing the opinions of Supreme Court helps build Garinger’s credibility, and even more so that he is was a former juvenile court judges, so he most likely has a personal relationships with the Supreme Court. Readers feel sympathy to any juvenile who have been charged as adults and been sentenced to life without parole.

In the article “On Punishment and Teen killers” by Jennifer Jenkin talks about juvenile justice. Jenkins talks about how her sister was killed by a teenager and how they should be sentenced to life of prison. Next it talks about how juvenile brains aren’t fully developed and that could be the cause of their behavior. Then It talks about how the nation is not sentencing children to die in person that it's just pure “propaganda.”Another thing about the article is they told a lie how that America is the “only” nation that sentences teens to life for murder. They say that in fact there is 11 nations that actually do sentence children to life for murder.

Gail Garinger in the article, Juveniles don’t deserve Life Sentences,claims that juveniles should not get a life sentence. Garinger supports her claims by first lists teens and young adults that have done terrible crimes. She then describes homicide as the worst crime,but explains how the Supreme Court won't give juveniles a life sentence for it. Lastly, the author explains how criminologists promoted a superpredator but how it never came to be. Garinger’s purpose is to inform people how kids don't deserve life sentences in order to inform people that they still have so much to live for. The author writes in a formal tone for the readers. This work is significant because it informed me on all the lives that have gotten life sentences.

The article “On Punishment and Teen Killers” by jennifer Jenkins, the author talks about a personal own story of a family member getting murdered by a juvenile who is now serving three life sentences and believed to be kept in prison because of violating the law. The author concurs that any juveniles that are imprisoned tend to commit a different crime after release, and people who fights for juveniles who are sentence life in prison should be kept. The advertisements of the media and legislator “ feature propaganda photos of 7- and 8- year- old child models on the cover, with misleading headlines that the United States was “sentencing children to die in prison”(Jenkins 92). This quote talks about the media’s way of misleading people on what the juveniles in prison truly

When dealing with a topic as controversial as is, we must take into consideration all aspects since there is a human life a risk. A life many may consider to not have even started yet. For a child to get sentenced to life in jail makes absolutely no sense. I agree with the Supreme Court justices who are for the eradication of mandatory life sentences to prison for juveniles because teens are still developing and changing everyday. We should take into account this proven biological fact as well as the environment of which they are exposed to every day.

Villafana 1 Sarai Villafana Mrs. Kehmeyer ERWC 6 March 2015 Juvenile Justice research paper Minority disagrees that juveniles should have a second chance, but to be punished with a sentence to life in prison.As Latio stated,” Even a 17 and a half year old who sets off a bomb in a crowded mall or guns down a dozen students and teacher is a child and must be given a chance to persuade a judge to permit his release into society..” I strongly believe everyone within the years of 17 and younger should be able to have a second chance. The supreme court is on the right path to abolish mandatory life in prison for juveniles who commit murder. As Lundstrom states, “ but it can be used as evidence that teenagers are not yet adults, and the legal system should not treat them as such” (Lundstrom 88).

Teens who commit crimes shouldn’t be charged as adults. It also has to do with the crime, if a teen breaks into a car he/she shouldn’t be charged as adults they should be charged as juvenile. Kids will be kids they will make mistakes but doesn't mean they should have their life taken from them. In the article (Kids are kids-Until they commit crimes) says “It’s a glaring inconsistency that’s getting more glaring by the hour as children as young as twelve and thirteen are being charged as adults in America’s courts.” young teens are getting their life taken away from them, they haven’t learned right from wrong if the court system just gives them life.

America is again divided by something that we need a solution for right away. Today, it is between the people who believe mandatory life in prison for juveniles should be abolished and those who believe the opposite. If a teenager committed murder and any other heinous act they indeed should be sentenced to life. We cannot let people get away with that. They took the life of another, so they should see how it feels. There are many reasons why you should believe juvenile life sentences should still be legal such as the effect it has on the victims families, the accountability these teens should have, and just how ludicrous any other counter argument can be.

In the article “On Punishment and Teen Killers” the author states “My youngest sister was the joy of our close family. When a teenager murdered her and her husband in 1990 in suburban Chicago, she was pregnant with their first child. She begged for the life of her unborn child as he shot her. He reported to a friend, who testified at his trial, about his “thrill kill” that he just wanted to “see what it would feel like to shoot someone.” This teen was charged as adult by the JLWOP ( Juvenile Life without Parole) his problem was he was believed to be a serial killer in the making. In the article Jenkins states “ After a series of other crimes, he planned the murders for months, carefully and privately. He did not act on impulse of peer pressure…” This quote means the teenager had other intentions of killing more people his problem was he just wanted to understand how it felt to kill someone and the consequence after the crimes were done. Maybe he believed since he was underage he would not get charged as an adult.

The death penalty has been a massively, controversial issue in various countries and states. The death penalty is a government-sanctioned practice whereby a person is put to death by the state as a punishment for a crime. Over every part of the world has used the death penalty or you’ll say capital punishment, but the majority of the countries abolished in taking part of the practice. As in America, 32 of the 50 states currently have the death penalty. There are five different methods of execution: lethal injection, electrocution, lethal gas, firing squad, and hanging. Moreover, all jurisdictions that are for execution are by lethal injection.