Oncotarget Code Of Conduct

The database utilized in the search was the Shapiro Library and EBSCOhost search engine for relevant articles. The inclusion criteria contained: peer reviewed scholarly, academic journals and date range of 2013 to 2017. Limiting the search criteria for recent relevant articles which had been validated by peers produces data that has trustworthiness and merit. The final sample was determined based on the population in the study, staffing levels and patient quality outcomes.

Cancer is listed as the second most common cause of death in western countries; particularly, in adults. Though it has a long antiquity, its prevalence and incidence today is pervasive and the war on cancer has not been promising. Malignant neoplasia is characterized by uncontrolled growth and the ability to metastasize or spread from the original site. Cancer results from mutations that promote cell proliferation and inhibit cell adhesion (metastasis). According to the National Cancer Institute (2016), “Cancer can also spread regionally,

Evaluating the eight papers for quality evidence was critical when selecting the two papers to utilise. The evidence hierarchy was considered, aiming to use the highest evidence possible, such as systematic reviews and meta-analyses; and randomized, controlled, double-blind studies, to ensure the most accurate evidence informed the clinical decision for the patient (Bloom, Olinzock, Radjenoic & Trice, 2013). When sorting the results, other various factors were also taken into consideration; credibility, reputability, reasonability and support. With these factors taken into account, the two papers selected are highly esteemed in regards to evidence, and are most relevant to the patient (Stichler, 2010).

Cancer is a deadly illness, terminal to say the least. Any information giving a lead to better chances with cancer is much appreciable. Oncotarget is there for everyone, to ensure that people have access to cancer information every time they need it. Every week, Oncotarget provides readers with insightful and constructive information about cancer. The medical journal, edited by the knowledgeable Mikhail Blagosklonny and Andrei V. Gudkov, is like a revelation in the field of oncology. Mikhail is a known scientist for his dedication to issues of cancer. Information on cancer prevention, diagnosis and its treatment is available at Oncotarget week-in-week-out.

The present report argues that the 3 identified sources, are published in high-ranked journals and based on sufficient patient population, thereby constituting a strong research evidence for addressing the established research question.

Evidence papers were evaluated by using the CASP tool, which systematically evaluates clinical research papers (Stevens,

Browsing through the Chamberlain Library at http://library.chamberlain.edu/Databases for a search of scholarly databases has generated a long list of websites specializing in publishing journal articles, literature, and books related to diverse types of disciplines and professions. The types of articles published may be health- related, communication, or education. Since the topic selected is health- related, Pub Med Health Database is the choice for its interest in publishing health articles. “Pub Med Health specializes in reviews of clinical effectiveness research,” (National Library of Medicine [NLM], n,..d., About Pub Med). The database is a service of the National Library of Medicine (NLM). It was created by the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBC), which is an affiliate of the NLM. Its Uniform Source (URL) can be found at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmedhealth/about/ Pub Med Health Database aim to provide up-to- date information to the general public and professionals about the latest science

The database utilized in the search was the Shapiro Library and EBSCOhost search engine for relevant articles. The inclusion criteria contained: peer reviewed scholarly, academic journals and date range of 2013 to 2017. Limiting the search criteria for recent, relevant articles which had been validated by peers produces data that have trustworthiness and merit. The final sample was determined based on the population in the study, staffing levels and patient quality outcomes.

Indeed, medical writers who specialize in developing peer-reviewed manuscripts and other scientific documents, commonly receive training in Good Publication Practice (GPP3) (12) and provide valuable services that have been shown to assist authors in their efforts to publish (10). They substantially help authors to disclose their research in peer-reviewed journals and at scientific congresses in an ethical,14 accurate,15,16 and timely17 manner, with the ultimate aim of advancing patient care. Professional medical writers are also more aware of and more likely to comply with the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) Recommendations for the conduct, reporting, editing, and publication of scholarly work in medical journals than academic researchers and clinical investigators

Peer review is an important process used in the scientific community. Considering the high standards expected from a research study, it needs to meet certain criteria. Many journals and institutions have external and internal peer review as part of their processing and approval of research studies. We can agree that the advancements in healthcare and technology have altered the way we approach research. The facilitated access of scholar databases makes a peer review an essential step of verifying, condensing, and organizing information.

Critical appraisal guidelines contains several international guidelines that improves the quality of published research studies. They focus on what is added to the publication of studies. Critical appraisal helps to promote its relevance to the patient’s concerns. There are three main questions that can help clinicians in finding accurate results of the patient’s concerns: (1) Are the results of the study valid?, (2) What are the results?, and (3) Will the results help in caring for my patient?. For the first question, it is important to understand the patient’s concerns before finding a study that fits in the criteria. The study should have minimized bias and are appropriate. Therefore must be valid. For the second question, the results of

“Life without disease” is the rallying call for Oncotarget. Oncotarget is a multidisciplinary journal with free access. The word “oncotarget” was coined to mean all processes and substances that pertain to cancer and aging of cells. It began as a journal for Oncology. It bore huge success due to its accommodative and punctual nature. This prompted its expansion to encompass other disciplines such as Microbiology and Immunology.Oncotarget allows people to present their research papers. It gives a second chance to people whose articles have been rejected by other journals. It allows for constructive peer reviews. This allows one’s research to have the most impact. Publishing of papers is timely and is done on a weekly basis. It further allows

Oncotarget is a medical Journal that focuses on all things Oncology. The Journal's Editor-and-Chiefs are Andrei V. Gudkov & Mikhail V. Blagosklonny and it was founded in 2010. The articles printed in the Journal are peer reviewed and based around medical issues in conjunction with Oncology. As at 2017 the Journal has made the decision to branch out and are now moving toward a multidisciplinary Journal. It is important to note that the Journal itself is 100% online based. The site itself is very busy but you can see radio buttons on the left hand side of the screen in order to help you navigate the site.

“Lack of standardization of the peer review process at the majority of hospitals leaves the door open for abuse” (Vyas & Hozain, 2014).

The ISMPP, founded in 2005 to enhance medical publication integrity and transparency and to improve standards and best practice, believes that “medical writers can often improve the efficiency and effectiveness of manuscript preparation by working with the research team to develop clear and concise manuscripts in a timely fashion” (Norris, 2007). PMWs streamline scientific exchange without compromising quality, ethics, or transparency (Sharma,