One Major Issue Of The Smoking In Public Ban

Tobacco remains legal and the treasury is said to make around 10 billion each year from taxing it. Coincidentally many states still have smoker-friendly bars. The smoking ban is said to be bad for business as well. Despite more efforts to prove otherwise, pubs and clubs are dying, in part, because of the business lost as smokers find somewhere else to drink they can smoke in peace. Where and how smokers think will always be beyond my understanding. They believe that the smoking ban is technologically backwards. It is not difficult, with decent modern air filtration technology, to make smoke virtually unnoticeable and certainly harmless. The smoking ban does not stop people from smoking. Even if it were appropriate to

Furthermore, numerous states across America have banned smoking in major public places, such as in restaurants, bars, work places, banks, parks and just about any area where there are a lot of people congregating. This is an effort to preserve public health. Even some advocates of smoking bans agree that, “restricting cigarette smoking in public places has clear health benefits and no adverse economic consequences” ("Smoking Bans and the Tobacco Industry"). The world can function pretty well without smoking, in fact studies showed that since the inception of smoking bans, there is a higher likelihood that a smoker may quit and that there is significant reduction in exposure to secondhand smoke. It not only benefits, non-smokers but it also helps smokers to kick the habit. Providing a flurry of reasons why it is so important to strive for the illegality of that which has done so much harm. With it completely illegal, Americans from state to state would undergo a drastic change—but for the better, our life spans would subsequently increase and we would be one step closer to getting rid of the diseases which have plagued us, as humans so long.

Hookah smoking is an issue because it is a socially acceptable way to consume tobacco, especially among young adult, due to its attractive fruity tastes and odor contrary to regular cigarettes. Hookah lounges are a preferable place for many people to smoke, socialize, and in some cases to study. In my opinion the spread of such lounges could increase the number of smokers, not to mention second hand smoking. This is unfortunate, especially with the huge progress we have made in the fight against cigarette smoking, while hookah lounges are getting more popular and may weaken our progression in this matter. The pictures that were taken show how hookah lounges are clearly targeting college students by opening across the street from main campus, to them this is just business, while to others this is an important public health concern.

There are arguments for smoking, one of them being that lots of people who work in places that make cigarettes would be made redundant and poor. They would also be sad and it can be hard to find a new job. People who smoke would not be able to buy cigarettes so they would be depressed as cigarettes help them relax.

Smoking ban can benefit the country at the first place. Several studies have documented health and economic benefits related to smoking bans. Scientists agree that smoking is dangerous. Tobacco smoke can cause cancer, strokes

Not only will this ban against smoking in public areas benefit the smokers’ health, this benefits the earth by reducing the amount of cigarettes littered/polluting the air. So many people just throw their cigarettes away without any second thoughts that it will just decompose into the earth like a banana peel. Or once it hits the ground, the hot ashes will be extinguished, put out in an instant. You may not think that just one cigarette thrown onto the ground is fine, but once you’ve thrown out at least 2 cigarettes a day, combined with millions of other people’s cigarettes thrown onto the ground, we have accumulated a giant mass of cigarette litter. From David Suzuki, in the article “Let’s get serious about cigarette litter- no ifs, ands or butts!” from August 17th, 2013;

Opponents of banning smoking in public places feel that it is a choice and that it will take away their free will. “They argue that people should have the autonomy to decide on what kind of lifestyle they will have” (3). Banning public smoking may also decrease business at local bars, restaurants, etc. “….as for establishments which are already smoke-free, competition will be higher. It will also be harder for them to leverage since there will be more businesses that are smoke-free” (3). Additionally, opponents say that non-smokers can walk away if it bothers them. If a person does not like being around smokers then they can simply move away from them or kindly ask the smoker to move. Some also argue that exhaust fumes are just as, if not more, harmful as cigarette smoke is. “Lastly, some critics contend that banning smoking in some places just leaves smokers no choice but to do it somewhere else. They mentioned that this can even lead to increase cases of DUI fatalities since smokers might drive to other places just so they can smoke” (3).

“Smoking is hateful to the nose, harmful to the brain, and dangerous to the lungs.” -King James I, royalty. Picking up a cigarette, is equivalent to putting a limitation on life. Sadly, numerous people will perform this activity anywhere they are, even where there are signs that read “no smoking.” Prohibit smoking in public places due to the fact that it can affect others health, pregnancy, and even harm their own body. People should be more aware of the effects smoking has on everyone, not just their own body.

I grew up with a mother and father who did not smoke, but when we would go visit my Grandma and Aunt every weekend I would not be able to stand the smell and always felt like I was suffocating. The only thing I really knew about the smoke in their houses was that it smelled horrible, I didn’t understand that it would affect me later on in life.

In 2014, the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) estimated that 16.8% of the population were smokers in the United States down from 42.4% in 1965, the first year the CDC started tracking that figure (“Trends in Current Cigarette Smoking Among High School Students and Adults, United States, 1965–2014” cdc.gov). Smoking bans are partially to thank in addition to education efforts for the plummeting number of smokers in this country, however, smoking bans in public parks should have no part in the effort to end tobacco dependency. Smoking bans in US public parks should be illegal because it would be extremely difficult to enforce, it limits individual liberties and ostracizes people, and the negative health impact to others outdoors is

Smoking is a well known habit. Many people smoke despite its obvious and widely advertised deleterious effects on health. Smoking is not only bad for the immediate users, but also the people surrounding them. It is an addiction that can effect others without their consent. Not only is it unhealthy physically but also a very expensive habit. It costs millions a year, and that is just to buy enough cigarettes to satisfy your addiction, not counting the cost of medical care needed, renovations of homes that smoking has ruined, and more problems branching from smoking. Having restrictions on smoking would not only benefit the individual smoker, but also people around them. Some may argue that its just a harmless habit and that putting a

This article talks about how the number of premature births and severe childhood asthma problems has dropped by after smoking was banned in public places. Researchers from the University of Maastricht and the University of Edinburgh studied 250,000 hospital visits and more than 2.5 million births for asthma attacks in children. It was discovered that “preterm births and hospital attendance for asthma has fallen by 10% “ especially in areas where smoking is banned.

One last puff? Public smoking bans and smoking behavior written by Anger, Kvansnicka and Sidler tries to examine how the effects of bans on public smoking influence individual smoking behavior. The authors observe the state level smoking bans that were introduced in Germany’s sixteen federal states effective on different dates in 2007 and 2008. The study shows a 2 percentage points decrease in propensity to smoke and propensity to smoke regularly among individuals with above median propensity to go out in regular basis, moreover average demand dropped by 0.42 cigarettes. This means that people who tend to go out more than the median of the population got effected by the law and decreased the number of cigarettes they smoked. The study shows that effectiveness of the law is largest for people who are in the top quartile for the propensity to go out. The authors try to identify the effects of the bans on individuals smoking propensity and intensity. The work is relevant and important since for a long time lawmakers have been attempting to cut down the figure of people smoking in a population. The survey is important because it analyzes the effectiveness of policies taken by the government.

While this caused a lot of debate at the time, one of the strongest points in favor of this ban is that it has health risks, and in addition to prevent adolescents to use this product. Another point is saving money, so that the demand for healthy products increases, at the same time, the Government would save money on health aid. By imposing smoking bans we have a better environment, we will be faced with less health problems and little by

Banning smoking in public places is debatably unfair to smokers. This takes away from their freedom, however, not banning it is unfair to those that do not smoke, and puts their health in danger. Smoking makes it unsafe for them to go to public places. For example, in restaurants and other public areas the smoke does not remain solely in the smoking section. Having a smoking section and a nonsmoking section in a building is better than mixing everyone together. However, if we drop dye into water, doesn't it spread? Smoke has the same effect and anyone who has ever paid attention to it will notice that fact. Smoke spreads from the smoking section all through the building in the air, therefore, spreading the dangers with it. For this reason, smoking should not be allowed in public places. The argument I support in the first paragraph is also in a position of benefit because the Surgeon General's Report concluded, “scientific evidence indicates that there is no risk-free level of exposure to secondhand smoke. Short exposures to secondhand smoke can cause blood platelets to become stickier, damage the lining of blood vessels, decrease coronary flow velocity reserves, and reduce heart rate variability, potentially increasing the risk of heart attack”(http://www.lungusa.org/site/pp.asp?c=dvLUK9O0E&b=35422#two). Although I agree that there may be some reward to smoking in public places, and that second-hand smoke is not