One-To-1 Proposal

There’s no denying that technology has grown to play a major role in education and learning. Students are using laptops, tablets, and smartphones to research, complete, and even collaborate on assignments, both in and outside of the classroom. Timothy D. Snyder and Thomas L. Friedman both have written articles expressing their opposing opinions on technology in the classroom. Timothy Snyder is a Professor of History at Yale University who has written five different award-winning books. In his article, “Why Laptops Are Distracting America’s Future Workforce”, Snyder explains to students and teachers why he is against technology in the classroom. Thomas Friedman is a reporter and columnist for The New York Times, author of six award-winning

Surely children today need a relationship with technology in order to thrive. The way that we can foster these bonds is by introducing technology to students in a classroom at a young age. If students are taught to respect technology and use it properly from the beginning of their relationship with it, these habits will continue into their teenage years and beyond into their adult lives. One-to-one computing from kindergarten on will allow students access to technology on demand, in the classroom and at home. By doing this, we allow students access to their learner profiles 24/7, giving them the option to learn anytime they please. Teachers can also tailor

Sharing opinions and thoughts lead to interesting arguments and allow the class to be more interactive. So why not allow them to use technology in every aspect of today’s modern education. Davidson suggests that education needs to implement crowd sourcing as a learning method; diversity is a very particular characteristic of our society and teachers should take advantage of those different ways of thinking to allow students join forces to find solutions on different problems, share knowledge and explore new ways to research things; parting from the premise that it doesn’t matter how brilliant a person could be, collective group is always smarter than one person separately. Teachers should encourage the use of technology always when in the classroom. If kids are so into their electronic devices why not teach through it by creating clever ways to learn such as phone apps. Therefore, take the negative aspect away and transform them into a resourceful teaching tool that would allow the students to be more interested and engaged in their

In defense of laptops in the classroom” Summary/Analysis/Response (SAR) Paper Summary “In defense of laptops in the classroom” written by Rebecca Schuman, talks about the issue of why computers should be allowed in a college classroom. Schuman explains how people of the new generation use computers in classrooms doing almost everything in college now, rather it be taking notes or accessing course material, and it's more affordable for poorer students. Analysis Schuman attempts to use logos, structuring of her article, and has a good purpose to persuade readers of her agreement. Schuman wrote this article “In defense of laptops in the classroom” in order to persuade professors why computers should be allowed in the classroom and how you can combat them if the student isn’t paying attention, plus they are more affordable for poorer students because they’re covered by financial aid. Schuman focuses on this group of audience primarily because some professors do not like computers in their classroom rather it be because the student isn’t paying attention or is using the computer for non-class related things. Schuman attempts to reason the discussion of why computers should be allowed in the class is that it’s completely up to the student whether they use it for good or not. Schuman makes the point early on that she feels that the computer is not faulty, but rather the student who makes the decision on what use to use the computer for. Schuman exemplifies this problem when she

The article states, “Using technology in team building appeared to hold substantial benefits for students, particularly those who had trouble engaging with their peers. Technology introduced a new dimension of relevance that made a difference in the schooling experience of otherwise disengaged students” (Bishop, Downes 2015). Students were placed in groups when they worked with technology and this allowed peers to seek each other 's help and eventually feel more comfortable working together. Teachers would be encouraged to use technology at least 2 hours a day. Kinder students can be given shorter periods of technology use and their use can be for learning numbers and alphabet. As grades increase the more independent students can be with their use of technology and the time they use it will also increase. What is clear is that technology is a key element in producing an effective school.

Computers and technological devices have been heavily used in millions of elementary classrooms throughout the world. While many people believe this is a beneficial thing some think it is taking over the traditional ways of learning and damaging their social interaction. All the colors and sounds on the screen attract children and make them think that what they are learning is fun and enjoyable. Using computers in the classroom is very beneficial, but it should not be replacing traditional ways of education. As Elizabeth Bohnhorst, author of Floppy Disk Fallacies, stated “…computers are being used more and more frequently as a substitute for books, blackboards, and in some cases, the teachers themselves (251-252)”. Students will soon not have the need to bring pencils, paper, and even a backpack to class because everybody will be using computers as a means of learning. Moreover, computers should be used only as a tool to assist learners and make certain tasks accomplishable more efficiently while also keeping traditional ways of learning.

The biggest problem with today’s education is how rapid technology is advancing. So rapid, in fact, that schools are attempting to keep up, but are sadly falling short. Teachers are being required to incorporate new technology into their everyday methods of teaching. The use of IPads or laptops in classrooms can be helpful to both teachers and students(edreform online classes)”. If a teacher is not overly familiar with the new devices, then the students will lose what little time they have to learn. As a teacher is attempting to fix technical problems in one class, the class that has a tech savvy teacher will be advancing far ahead. On the other hand, if a classroom is full of students who are very unfamiliar with the technology will have to be taught how to operate it, which wastes valuable time. In today’s society technology usage is so much more widespread than it was just five years ago. The new toys can allow schools to broaden their curriculum. Since most work can be done on a single device, kids can work at their own pace and potentially reach heights they could never reach with book, pen, and paper. The benefits of this new tech greatly outweigh the downsides. The biggest problem with technology in classrooms is their lack of use. So few schools have jumped on board with these programs, and therefore are holding their kids back. These products are readily available, but “the use of new technology

In Samuel G. Freedman’s article published in 2007 titled “New Class(room) War: Teacher vs. Technology”, he shares with readers that it is becoming increasingly more difficult for teachers to teach because students are easily distracted by gadgets during lessons while Matt Britland’s article, “What is the future of technology in education?” published in 2013, is encouraging and promoting schools and educational institutions to use the cloud. Generally, Freedman’s article featured in The New York Times seems more credible and convincing as compared to Britland’s article in The Guardian because he provides an impartial view on the topic and he uses a diversity of sources to validate his points while Britland brings in his personal views and uses only a trail he conducted on his own to sustain his views.

McAllen school district in Texas recently spent twenty million dollars on I-pads and I-pods for students. The funding for the school district is coming from a combination of local funds, federal grants, and stimulus money. The schools in that area are considered some of the poorest in the nation(Ryan Holeywell). In schools around the world the students are starting to use technology in the classroom such as I-Pads, I-Phones, and other types of devices. Technology has changed Students day to day life, it has modified how and what students are taught negatively and positively.

The purpose of this op. ed. is to explain the Waldorf school system's policy that technology should not be allowed in a child's education. This is developed firstly through the use of explaining what parents think of their children's education. For example, many times throughout the article it is mentioned that many parents of students attending Waldorf schools are employees of technologically advanced companies such as Google and Apple. Also, the article gives quotes from parents, such as one from Alan Eagle,

Approximately three years ago my district began a journey to become 1:1. So far one could best describe the progress as hit and miss. Some teachers embrace the situation and ran with it. Others not so much. Ask any teacher who embraced this opportunity and they will all agree the single greatest challenge comes from outside the building. The Hickman Mills School District consists of students in high poverty situations. Many of which have no internet access at home. This makes it difficult to provide students opportunities to work on any tech related assignment outside the building. Another issue arises from lost or damaged technology. Many parents cannot afford the fees incurred when their child loses or damages chargers and or iPads.

In the article "Can Students Have Too Much Tech?" Susan Pinker explains the pros and cons of technology in the classroom. Her argument is supplemented by Studies from Duke University and Stanford University. She also utilized the history of the One Laptop per child nonprofit, along with her own research and opinions.

By allowing them to take this device home there school district have seen in Students responding with incredible enthusiasm, excitement, and creativity stated Mark Edwards a superintendent of Henrico County Public Schools in Virginia.For instance Mr edwards was named 2001 Superintendent of the Year by the Virginia Association of School Superintendent. Not only can the one to one help outside of school but it can help in the classroom as well because it save time when taking notes it allow you to lookup information if you have a question . think about it the one to one is a huge improvement to your school so think it over and you will see that it is great to

Usage of technology in school will only make students' social problems worse. In the article

Have you ever taken a tour to an middle or high school and saw where the black boards use to be there are now giant computer screens? Our world is changing to a new era where technology has taken over not only the homes but the schools as well. Computers can now be found in almost every classroom and home, but, is this a good a thing or a bad thing? In the New York Times article “Can Students Have too Much Tech” written by Susan Pinker she examines what it means to have technology not only in the classroom but, in the homes of many children. While I agree that teachers must also be equipped with skills to manage, educate, and control technology in their lesson plan, I find her reference to be flawed. Her references does not examine the educational