Online Communities Of Place: Community Analysis

Every person deserves the right to experience a sense of community amongst people who share a common characteristic. A sense of fellowship amongst similar people allows a person to become more comfortable with who they are through interactions with others who are going through—or have gone through—the same triumphs or hardships. Without this feeling of belonging, one could be driven into insanity. Anxiety due to isolation and desolation could run rampant through a person’s mind because of the loneliness that comes with a lack of community—making it an essential part of a humanhood. By definition however, community invites inimitability. Community can be defined as a group of unique individuals with shared characteristics. From that a

In the article, Social Media as Community written by The New York Times, “Social media has made every relationship persistent and pervasive. We no longer lose social ties over our lives; we have Facebook friends forever” (Par. 5). In this example, the audience can learn that many of times, these devices are what keep all of beings connected with each other. The text evidence suggests that without these devices, and would easily lose touch, and become disconnected. Readers can come to the conclusion that PCHS should not participate in “Shut Down Your Screen Week” because they would lose contact with their connections.

I have enjoyed reading your post, Laney. You have provided a concrete definition for a community. I agree with you. A community consists of more than just a group of people within a determined geographical location (University of Kansas, 2015). There are other aspects that are unique to each community. Individuals in each community share similar features that are unique to them. They share similar values, culture, and traditions. A community can also be defined by its demographics, environment, economics, health, and quality of life (University of Kansas, 2015). A community can also be defined by the number and type of establishments that it contains, such as universities, churches, libraries, and hospitals (University of Kansas, 2015). A

The written word,now a weapon, is now digitized and feed through media. “A book is a loaded gun in the house next door. Burn it. Take the shot from the weapon.” (Bradbury 58). Not only have books become a media revolution so has social interaction. Social media allows for connections formerly unheard. “The problem, they say, is that we spend so much time maintaining superficial connections online that we aren’t dedicating enough time or effort to cultivating deeper real-life relationships.”(WSJ). This avenue of socialization allows for discretion of the true life and person of the poster. “And even worse, the human condition is beginning to devolve. We have become addicted to the vanity of social media unable to expose our lives to the world.”(Green). This media based socialization can overtake the lives of many. “When you add it all up, the average American spends more than 10 hours a day plugged into some form of media.”(Synder). Making the human race even more technology

Ken Griffey Jr. is a well-known name in the world of Major League Baseball. Before the Seattle Mariners traded Griffey Jr. to the Cincinnati Reds, he was an absolute phenomenal baseball player. Since being traded, he has been nothing but disappointment to the Reds organization. The following is a dialogue between the two members in an online community at ESPN.com.

According to our textbook, community is defined as “people bound either by geography or by webs of communication, sharing common ties, and interacting with one another” (Hutchison, p. 298, 2012). Communities are all around us whether it be a school setting community or a social media community such as Twitter, Facebook, or Instagram. This community can also be broken into two categories: One is territorial community, meaning the community has territory that it is on, and the other is relational community, meaning the community does not have a territory. When examining the theoretical approaches to community there are five theoretical approaches to community: “contrasting types approach, spatial arrangements approach, social systems approach, social capital approach, and conflict approach” (Hutchinson, p. 301, 2012). All of these approaches show how the communities around an individual can affect them physically and mentally. Out of the

These days it seems that the Internet, a post-modern medium, something so complex and vital to our society as being reduce to a mere antiquity of personal feuds and interactive relationships (or at least the satisfaction of what seems like a relationship) between people. The rise of social media applications like Twitter and Facebook allows people to voice their opinions to wider audience, creating a pluralist, postmodern medium in which questions raised about the impact of mediated relationships have surely increased. What is particularly interesting about Twitter (and to a lesser extent Facebook) is the newfound proximity we ‘normal people’ have to modern

A community is a place where people around supposed to be able to live and thrive together. When one thinks of a community, the image that most likely is visualized is one of a place where each person lives harmoniously with all the other members of that community. While this may be the typical image of a community, it is not the realistic view. In reality communities can share both good and bad aspects. In Place Matters: Metropolitics for the Twenty-First Century Peter Dreier, John Mollenkopf, and Todd Swanstrom make the argument that the place a person lives ultimately matters over all else; the place which a person lives effects the choices that that he/she makes and determines his/her ability to obtain a

Social media such as Facebook, Twitter, MySpace, Instagram, and Flicker was invented to keep us in touch and keep us closer to our family and friends. But according to How Facebook ruins Friendships “we took our friendship online” (Bernstein). First we began communicating more by email than by phone and then switched to instant messaging or texting. By joining social Medias online

The second concept I want to talk about is virtual communities. Virtual communities are social groups whose interactions are mediated through information technologies, particularly the internet. Like modernism, virtual communities are very dependent on technology and the internet. Since science and technology has advanced in the past decade, people don’t need to go to different places to meet different people and can meet others over different social media platforms or even video games. Sometimes, those people met over the internet can become very close friends. For example, I play a lot of video games and I have acquainted myself virtually with many people playing those games. Some of them I even ended up meeting in real life and are still friends with today. Virtual communities have become such a social norm, that soon, people will have friends all over the internet. I think the aspect of virtual communities is good for society, because it allows people to have a greater awareness of other cultures all over the world. With more insight of how other societies and cultures operate, there is a greater chance to expand one's own social

Communities comprised of highly attached people are more likely to work together to achieve a desired outcome, such as protecting the environment (G.Brown,Reed,&Harris, 2002) and protecting the social and physical features that characterize their neighborhoods (Mesch&Manor,1998).Place attachment influences both

Communities are all about groups of individuals who share something in common. This makes going on the internet seem like an odd way to find more communities, form new ones, or strengthen pre-existing ones. The internet however is full of communities. Communities can be based upon religion, location, ethnicity, an interest, or a personal matter. The internet itself is “a global distributed data communications network” (Kirmayer, Raikhel, & Rahimi, 2013, p. 166). This is what makes the internet so full of communities because communication is the key to putting multiple individuals with commonalities into communication, which is the basis of any community. Online communities differ from communities that exists off the web in a couple of

Social network sites (SNSs) such as such as Friendster, CyWorld, and MySpace allow individuals to present themselves, articulate their social networks, and establish or maintain connections with others (Ellison, 2007). These sites could be used for work related situation, romance, connecting with individuals with shared interest, or creating a connection amongst college students. Facebook enables its users to present themselves in an online profile, accumulate ‘‘friends’’ who can post comments on each other’s pages, and view each other’s profiles (Ellison, 2007). Individuals can write on the wall of friends, send private message, comment on posts, as well as chat via instant messaging. Much of the early research on online communities assumed that individuals using these systems would be connecting with others outside their pre-existing social group or location, liberating them to form communities around shared interests, as opposed to shared geography (Ellison, 2007).

In the article "Social Media as Community", Keith Hampton argues that social media users are more likely to form stronger connections with confidants than the average American. Hampton acknowledges that many people in today's society are seeing the negative effects of social media, but he claims that the positive effect of building a powerful community outweighs those negative effects. Keith Hampton effectively persuades the readers of his opinion by using an informal tone, statistics, and the rhetorical triangle.

Communities are affected, and in a sense defined by, forces that affect community members and their space. The forces can range from outside organizations such as the government and large corporations … These components of the community vary infinitely, and thus no two communities are the same; even a given community is not the same over time (Cnaan & Milofsky, p. 1)