Open-Ended Interview Questions

The whole reason for a therapeutic relationship is to facilitate a successful patient outcome. Each person is unique and has different needs.

A therapeutic relationship is a key component in the nursing profession. Without therapeutic relationships, the best possible care can never be provided. The foundation in which trust is built upon is created from the nurse’s ability to truly listen and respond appropriately. Listening creates the base in developing a strong, trusting relationship. Sometimes it is simply hearing what a patient says that makes all the difference, empowering them to open up and become more comfortable with the nurse (Hawkins-Walsh, 2000).

This essay intends to introduce the reader to the most important skills involved within developing and maintaining a therapeutic relationship between a client and the therapist or counsellor. The onus will be on Humanistic counselling but many of these skills are central to all counselling types.

A review of the proposed participants of the study will ensure high-risk groups (if any) will be considered as per the National Statement on Ethical Conduct in Human Research (‘National Statement’; NHMRC, 2007). While some of these high-risk

As previously mentioned, it is thought that engagement and understanding are key elements involved in creating and maintaining a therapeutic relationship (Orlinskey et al 1994). Throughout the risk assessment I checked the patients

Respect for human dignity includes two rights; the right to self-determination and the right to full disclosure. When conducting a research study these two rights must be maintained to ensure that the participants are not coerced into participation and that they are making the choice of their own free will. Patients must be provided with all the information necessary to make an informed decision and voluntarily participate. No deception or concealed data collection can be done because it will violate the patients’ rights.

The method I chose for this analysis is in-depth interview. This ethnographic method will be best because it allows me to understand an

In a research done in mental health, it was noted that clients placed substantial focus on the therapist ability to build a therapeutic relationship. They focused on the relationship being built on care, trust and respect. There are many aspects to building a rapport with service users, with the importance on maintaining a professional behaviour in the healthcare system.0

This model provides flexibility to a semi-structured concept to encourage creativity among counseling professionals. As a future Marriage and Family Therapist, I have a strong connection with using theories encompassing the family dynamics and culture. As a proponent of Play Therapy interventions, I enjoy teaching clients emotion regulation and relaxation techniques through creative activities in the best interest of the client. Furthermore, conjoining parent-child sessions not only provides growth of the child but unites the family and increases skill building for all individuals attending sessions. Conversely, unlike other trauma models, TF-CBT provides clients with multiple phases of cognitive coping and processing to explore and correct negative distortions through building confidence and skills. Teaching the child and parent’s relaxation breathing, effective emotion expression, and cognitive coping skills prepare the family for modules deemed difficult because sharing the traumatic experience involves painful emotions. Consequently, processing the child’s trauma nearing the end of treatment allows the counselor and family to build a strong therapeutic relationship in multiple sessions prior to the trauma narrative and processing the traumatic experience. This trauma model provides hope for traumatized individuals to take back the

Scales evaluated by the client were: the Barrett Lennard Relationship Inventory, sessions 3, 8,16 (BARLEN; Barrett-Lennard, 1962). The Retrospective assessment of therapy experience, after treatment, a 1 to 5 scale rating of how well treatment moved. SASB, sessions 3, 8, 16, 22.2. The measures assessed through the therapist were SASB, sessions 3, 8, 16, 22. The Post-Session assessment, a unique detail of how well the meeting went. On a ten-point scale rated regarding sessions 3 and 16 (PSR); and Therapist Regrets, a yes/no evaluation of whether the therapist reported, having made mistakes during session 3. Finally, supervisors evaluated the therapist after training on six items, for example, competence and motivation). The individual observers, progressive clinical psychology graduate students or practicing clinicians trained to use the measures, obtuse to the theory of the current training, and formed into teams of at least two evaluation per measure from which their average score was taken to improve reliability. Therapists on every cohort grasp certain evaluation process throughout. Furthermore, and, at least, two other groups were available for all measures, except the VNIS and the HA, for each which only had one cohort. Assignment of each cohort videotape segments based on a goal of equal numbers of parts for each cohort, as well as the availability for the evaluation of the cohorts. The mediocre was also taken, wherever data occurred and available from multiple

Following a critical overview of the literature, this chapter outlines the research methodology. It will provide a justification for a qualitative methodological approach and specification of methods employed. Highlighting the appropriateness of interviews and focus groups in relation to the methodology and overall research. It will also provide recognition of their relative strengths and limitations.

I decided to interview our Costa Rican tour guide Victor. Some of the undergraduate students and I got an opportunity to talk to Victor about some of his travels and his life. The following interview questions focus on Victor’s life, his family, and his beliefs.

The Research and Ethics Committee from the school nursing had a chance to analyze and approve the research proposal before the research begins to contact the participants. The researchers informed the participants of the contents and obtained consent from each participant. Participants were given the guarantee that confidentiality and the concept of beneficence would be respected. It was made clear to the participants that they could withdraw from the study at any time. Participation in the research was also voluntary.

Three children were interviewed, two, five year olds who attend the local school, one of whom attended the setting before starting formal education. The third child was three years old and attended the setting at the time of the interviews. The three children were interviewed together, as this was thought to give the children confidence and not to feel inhibited by having a face to face interview alone (Vasquez, 2000). This worked well as the children added to one another's answers and helped keep the conversation on the research topic. Although, as one child was younger than the other two, it was important to remind the older two children of the importance of hearing all of their comments and responses. Semi structured interviews gave the children the opportunity to lead the conversation, although this hindered the researcher to keep a focus on the research topic, it did help the children to relax and not feel pressured, which was deemed more

There are many variables that influence the success of therapy for the client, none more so than the therapeutic relationship. The therapeutic relationship is defined as the strength and collaborative relationship between the client and therapist that emphasises mutually agreed goals and tasks within the context of a strong affective bond (Horvath, 1994.) In the therapeutic relationship, the clinician offers care, touch, compassion, presence, and any other act or attitude that would foster healing, and expects nothing in return (Trout, 2013.) Some clinicians believe that the “therapeutic relationship is a precondition of change, others as the fertile soil that permits change, while others see it as the central mechanism of change itself” (Norcross, 2010.) This is not to devalue other variables that impact the success of the therapy such as client involvement and the treatment method.