Operating Surgeon Consequentialism

The primary form of consequentialism used by the majority of individuals when making ethical decisions is known as Utilitarianism. Utilitarianism weighs the outcomes by whether they create pleasure or pain for the individuals involved. This creates a standard when evaluating the consequences rather than allow the individual to create their own (Kyte 108). Even though there is a plethora of different pleasures and pains of various forms and severities. Since we often choose familiar pleasure, only an individual familiar in both side can voice their opinion based on their understanding of both sides. However, it is not always easy to make accurate predictions on the outcomes and also consider the consequences of every individual that could be effected by the decision (Kyte 120, 122). Even though we understand the concept of consequences, it is not easy to think of every potential one, how they affect others, and whether they cause pleasure or

Charlie's doctors did make an ethical decision when they did the surgery. So the first step in ethics is to gather info and understand what you are reading. Charlie's doctors knew what they were doing because they are scientists and doctors. Like when they performed tests with Charlie and Algernon. The second part to an ethical decision is that you need to make an educated guess from facts for the future and they help you get expected results and you have to make a decision that won't hurt people. When the doctors made the choice they made it was based off their research and tests they gave Charlie. Their choice also didn't hurt Charlie

When analyzing consequentialism, one would come to the conclusion that it is a monistic view. Particularism challenges consequentialism when it states to always choose the action with the maximal amount of goodness to come of it. What if a human was in a situation where one had to make a decision where both outcomes are equally good/bad. The example of whether a perfectly healthy man should be sacrificed for 5 ill humans in need of organs. The goodness of saving 5 lives as opposed to one is considered to produce more goodness than keeping one life. Obviously, this is not how our world works. The rule of consequentialism does not hold it's own with this example. Consequentialism bases their way of making decisions by using a form of measurement. It seems that not all choices in life are that easy to make, especially by solely measuring happiness. Particularism focuses more on particular circumstances. What could create more goodness in one situation could do the opposite in another situation. Who is to say what creates the most happiness? One human may believe action a will create more happiness than action b, but another human may believe action b will create more happiness. Consequentialism seems to be a good view for the overall wellness

First off, utilitarianism is the philosophical view about how we should evaluate a things that are involve choices that people have to make. These things that are evaluated are actions, laws, policies, character traits, and moral codes. In general, whatever is being evaluated, we are the ones that have to choose the one that will produce the best overall results. Utilitarianism is also a form of consequentialism this is because utilitarianism is based on the consequences or results of actions that are the only standard of right and wrong. Utilitarian’s say that we should choose the option that has “maximizes utility,” i.e. that action or policy that produces the largest amount of good. Although it may be similar to Utilitarianism is distinctly different from other forms of consequentialism such as egoism as it considers all interests equally. On

The basic idea of Rule Consequentialism is that what is morally right is based on how the action stands to an ideal code of rules. The Theory of Right Conduct states “an action A is right if and only if (and because) A is not prohibited by an ideal code of rules.” A wrong action, then, would be prohibited by said code (155).

Dr. Peter Mack, a surgeon in the Singapore General Hospital, discusses utilitarianism from a different perspective, relating it to the dilemma often faced by physicians where they have to choose between what is good for one and what is good for many. Even though physicians are trained to treat each individual patient as an isolated case that deserves equal attention and allocation, the harsh reality is that there are times when healthcare professionals are faced with limited time and resources, and must decide how distribute them fairly (Mack). He justifies his decision to call on Utilitarianism in such cases, mentioning three of its components of maximization, consequentialism, aggregation, and welfare.

Consequentialism is a theory that suggests that the morality of an action is to be judged solely by its consequences. In this case, this is what the greater good is defined as; a decision made that would positively impact the majority of a community and would lead to further progression. For the greater good to be achieved, one must do a little wrong. Now, what is defined as wrong? How do we tell the difference from right and wrong? To what extent must one go to, for their actions to be defined as wrong? For an act to be considered wrong, it has to be dishonest and immoral. One that would physically and/or mentally hurt a group of people, and one that would go against the law. Hence, I do agree with the statement that for the greater good to

The most important goal of all surgeons is to provide the highest possible standard of care to all patients (Kokemuller). One of the critical factors that contribute to this excellent care is the patient’s individual experiences and personal choices made throughout their treatment process. ABC News emphasizes that,

Utilitarianism Is a consequentialist theory. consequences are the only criteria from moral action. utilitarianism also differs from ethical theories that make the rightness or wrongness of an act dependent upon the motive of the agent; for, according to the Utilitarian, it is possible for the right thing to be done from a bad motive.

Consequentialism argues that what makes an action ethically right or wrong is the good or bad consequences of such action. Consequentialism does not start giving priority to ethical standards as it does Deontologism, but giving priority to the objective to be achieved, identifying with it a certain state of the good or valuable (a better world/universe) things. Therefore, consequentialism considers an ethically correct action one that, whatever it is, fosters that good or valuable state of things (the right end justifies the means), and an ethically wrong action one that fosters a bad state or disvalue.

A consequentialist theory of obligation centers around the idea that the morality of a situation is based upon the consequences of an action. The doctrine states that the morality of an action is to be judged solely by its consequences. Since it is to be judged solely on the consequences, the means to achieve said action are not necessary in understanding the morality of the situation. Rather than understanding the entire situation, a consequentialist will evaluate the situation exclusively by the consequences.

Consequentialism is the thought the right actions bring the right consequences. While this seems like a fairly simple process to basing moral decisions on, it does not define what is “right.” This means that to one

Consequentialism: The overall outcome of our actions compared and contrasted with societal constituents, which in term is rule abiding, with the clear intent of only good, similar to perfectionism.

According to the definition of consequentialism, an action is morally right if the consequences of that action are more favorable than unfavorable. Right thing or wrong depend of the consequences of an act, and that the more good consequences are produced, the better the act, says the consequentialism. This ethical type us the guidance of how to live in our community, our society, and the world in particular. From this ethical type, we find three subdivisions: ethical egoism in which imply that an action is morally right if the consequences of that action are

Consequentialism is primarily based on two principles. One is whether an act is right or wrong only depends on the result from that act. Also the more positive the consequences an act turns out, the better or more right that act is. “For a particular decision or action to be morally appropriate, then it must on balance generate better consequences than all other available courses of action” (William & Arrigo, 2012). If morality does depend upon that we bring about good consequences through action, we need to first acknowledge what things are “good” or possibly the things we value the most. People should be able to live to maximises the good consequences. Therefore, when people are faced with a moral dilemma, there should be a guidance where a person should choose the action that maximises the better consequences.