Operation Redwing

I see the pros and cons to each side, and find value within each point. However, looking at the grand scheme of things, I believe war is necessary. Yes, it is violent and gruesome and many innocent lives are lost, but is there a better way? I believe if there was a better way to solve the conflicts many wars are fought over, that this method would be already implemented. The fact is that war works, and has worked for centuries. Take for example arguably the most important war in all of American history. The revolutionary war freed us from Great Britain. Without that very war, we as a nation may still be under British rule and control, and all of history would have been altered. This is not to say that I am a supporter of involvement in specific wars, just a supporter of war in general. I do not believe that each conflict between a nation is means for a war to be fought, but only in the case where peaceful disputes and efforts have failed. My overall view lies similar to Tim O’Brien’s view as he stated in his novel. “It was my view then, and still is, that you don't make war without knowing why. Knowledge of course, is always imperfect, but it seemed to me that when a nation goes to war it must have reasonable confidence in the justice and imperative of its cause. You can't fix your mistakes. Once people are dead, you can't make them undead” (O’Brien 38). There is a time and a place for war.

In June 2005, Operation Red Wing, Marcus Luttrell and three other Navy Seals, Matt Axelson, Mark Murphy, and Danny Dietz, set out to stop the Taliban from taking over an Afghan village of innocent Afghan citizens. “After mentioning Luttrell and his survival story, a woman from the crowd screamed, “You’re a hero, Marcus!”.” (“Conservation Post”) Marcus Luttrell is great friends with a former Governor,

War has been present throughout history and plays a major role in power, politics, and glory.

People believe war can help the development of mankind and country. Stated by Emile Zola in her book The Origin of the First World War, “It is only warlike nations which have prospered; a nation dies as soon as it disarms. War is the school of discipline, sacrifice and courage” (Document 1). Zola’s point is very true. After years of war, the winning country can always gain some sort of profit.

The conflict of war and its effects have been debated throughout history. Some argue that there are other peaceful alternatives besides war that would lead to a better outcome, but in reality this is not the case. War is a natural part of human interactions, and even though it brings death and destruction, war will not cease to exist. Wars are the human way of getting one group to look superior than the other. The idea of a passive approach is ideal, but it is almost nearly impossible and may not always lead to the same outcome as if a war had taken place.

War has freed oppressed people and allowed them to feel a sense of pride about where they are from and how they got there. The Revolutionary War is a key example of this, the colonists felt violated and that their government was oppressing their natural rights. They fought with everything they had to break away, and the country became the United States of America. Today, people from the United States are very proud of what the colonists accomplished. They allowed America to be free, and to become great. When war allows people to form a better government, it is very beneficial. Without the Revolutionary War, America would not be America, and therefore it would never have become the world leader it is today. War has also saved people. In many instances, such as World War ll, war has actually saved lives. If no

Throughout history, war has always been described as an atrocity and an unnecessary reason for the loss of life. This is not the case. War is necessary for the survival of the economy, the sustainability of non-renewable resources, and the progression of inventions.

In the end, war can overcome a substantial issue that people have been dealing with for years. On the other hand, war can lead to humongous destruction. It can cause us to hate each other. War can cause us to become greedy animals. It all depends on the outcome of the war.

Wars have impacted the United States greatly on both beneficial and detrimental standards. Throughout the history of the United States this idea of war has played a significant role in the emergence of this prominent country. A politician’s standing policy on the concept of war has held great impact on the political spectrum, many voters hold strong views on war. Some argue we should enact a policy of isolationism, through this we can focus more on the issues within United States instead of other nations. On the other hand many claim being in war is beneficial because we can hold impact on surrounding countries and though wars recreate revenue and jobs

On June 28, 2005 The SEAL team, led by LT Michael P. Murphy and consisting of petty officers Matthew Axelson, Danny Dietz and Marcus Luttrell, were on a mission to kill or capture Ahmad Shah, a Taliban leader who commanded a group of insurgents known as the "Mountain Tigers," west of Asadabad. The initial counter-insurgent mission in Kunar Province, Afghanistan seemed to be running accordingly with a successful infiltration into enemy territories until local Goat herders stumbled upon the teams hiding spot. While very concerned with their own well being the Seal team was unable to verify Hostile intent from the herders. LT Murphy put the final decision of the goat herder’s fate up to vote by the team. Axelson voted to

War shapes the future by the blood spilt on the battlefield settling the conflicts that caused the rage in the first place. As soldiers die for the ideology of a small group of men, it feeds the fire that creates a horrific picture. Now, I did not have these thoughts as a younger man but rather had a glorious and Hollywood picture instead. Growing up, war was necessary to accomplish the objective moral ideals of goodness. American Senator William E. Borah of Idaho said it best as he voted to declare war on Germany in 1917. “... it commits this Government to a policy of war in defense of American rights, for the protection of American citizens, and for the security of the American Republic.” As a young man, quotes like these made me want to join a war when evil surfaces and pokes its ugly head challenging good. When I turned eighteen I was ready to have an honorable campaign in the infantry. Growing up as a kid, my father always had a book in his hand that had to do with war anything from Civil War to the Vietnam War. I would describe my father as a patriot, serving his country for 8 years. He was deeply passionate and intrigued about past American Wars, which with this very patriotic tone, it had leaked onto his son. I was taught to have great respect and pride for my country and so I had great interest in American wars also. But, I had not been familiar with the First World War and thought it would be a nice opportunity to understand America and her involvement in it.

“War may sometimes be a necessary evil. But no matter how necessary, it is always an evil, never a good. We will not learn how to live together in peace by killing each other’s children. This famous quote is from James Earl “Jimmy” Carter, Jr., who served as the 39th President of the United States. It implies that war can be justified under strict circumstances where it can be necessary, but it is still abhorrent. War is defined as a state of armed conflict between different countries or different groups within a country. Justification refers to the action of showing something to be right or reasonable. War brings many negative and catastrophic impacts not just to the country, but to the people living in the country as well, which this paper

War is controversial, unfortunate, and certainly misunderstood; it is a transforming agent, a catalyst for change. Nonetheless, many people focus on war's negative consequences, while positive effects are downplayed. War is a necessary evil in the sense that it stabilizes population, encourages technological advances, and has a very high economic value. Without war, the overpopulation of the human race is inevitable. It is this reason that war is a useful tool by not only Mother Nature, but also humans themselves to institute population control.

Famous Prussian military theorist Karl von Clausewitz said that "war is the continuation of politics by other means." which supports the idea of war as a culturally influenced situation that is determined by the political power in control. War is a tool in the arsenal of a successful power to use when debating and non-violent persuasion fail to achieve the goals of the power. War is always waged for a reason, war is not a random act of slaughter. It is consequential to both the attacking and defending parties and no matter the amount of casualties, war comes with a heavy price. The financial cost of war is astronomical and the effects of war can be damaging to the political power. This is why war is usually a secondary resort instead of an impulsive decision coming from instinctive biology and not rationale. Biology has shown us that we do have reflexive, self defense mechanisms built in that serve the purpose of defending us from predators. But instead of fighting for a cause initiated out of respect for our self defense, we find these mechanisms being manipulated by the political power in order to gain public support for a war waged for entirely calculated reasons and not based on emotional expression. Denis Diderot, a French philosopher, elaborates on war as a

War is a seen by those who are against it as the most devastating and dreaded type of human interaction ADDIN EN.CITE Hedges2003517Hedges (2003)5175176Hedges, C.War is a force that gives us meaning2003Gütersloh, GermanyRandom House9781400034635http://books.google.co.ke/books?id=k-KlOS_4b-8C HYPERLINK l "_ENREF_4" o "Hedges, 2003 #517" Hedges (2003). In the society, we leave in, discussions about war are held and preparations for warfare are a normal day-to-day occurrence. Proponents of war argue that nations get a meaning from war and not just carnage and destruction in it way. ADDIN EN.CITE Hedges2003517Hedges (2003)5175176Hedges, C.War is a force that gives us meaning2003Gütersloh, GermanyRandom House9781400034635http://books.google.co.ke/books?id=k-KlOS_4b-8C HYPERLINK l "_ENREF_4" o "Hedges, 2003 #517" Hedges (2003) argues that war gives life a meaning and purpose there by giving people a reason to leave. According to Hedges, with war an excitement hangs in the air. War provides a cause and a resolve to a country as it allows its citizens to be noble ADDIN EN.CITE Hedges2003517(Hedges, 2003)5175176Hedges, C.War is a force that gives us meaning2003Gütersloh, GermanyRandom House9781400034635http://books.google.co.ke/books?id=k-KlOS_4b-8C( HYPERLINK l "_ENREF_4" o "Hedges, 2003 #517" Hedges, 2003).