Optional Education.In Some Schools, You Can Show Up And

If students are rewarded for quality schoolwork, grades may initially improve. They may show more excitement. However, in the article “Why You Shouldn’t Pay Children for Grades” by Amy Mccready, it is found that the enhanced grades deteriorate along with the excitement for the payment. Most children simply lose interest in the reward. It is better to just let youth accomplish

(Balakit 1). However, That is not the case in 46 high schools in Texas. These high schools offer cash incentives to students for passing their AP exams. “One school district saw a 600% rise in students passing AP math, science and English tests.” When before at five different high schools less than a third of the students passed the AP test they took (Klausnitzer 1). “The number of passing scores for all students in AP math, science and English have increased 489% since the program was started” (1). So based on this program money incentives work very well to motivate students to try harder.

As in many cases, scholars have different insights about the issue of offering money for high grades of school-age children. There are always parents who go for this idea and motivate their children then . While another group of parents believe that it is not good and this action will make their children dependent on the reward. They claim that such approach will not help their children in future. My own stance delinatesdelineates with the first group. It could be a very good idea if parents make some motivations for their children as they are studying. Because in today's competitive world, education plays an important role in children's future. So parents must try their best to make their children study well.

Realistically the argument made by Ariana Prothero is that paying students might be a good thing, but stylistically it doesn't work in every case. Taking research from an outside source, about an incentive program in college where a man named Roland Fryer put six million dollars into eighteen thousand low income students to try to improve test performance. In the end, the takeaway is that students feel more entitled to have a reward of an output more so than input. Therefore meaning some students, test scores aren't going to improve, because they don't know how to improve them. So students would rather get money after they know what grade they have other than, having a requirement to meet. It's probably way too much pressure for them to have on themselves.

The source that supports the statement is “Greatschools.org - Edward Decic.” “The promise of external rewards, and the child’s natural enthusiasm may be dampened.”This mean that students that do receive pay for their grades will lose their natural enthusiasm. When students see that they are getting payed they will only care about the money and not learning. All in all, the student’s natural enthusiasm will dampen if paid.

If they pay the kids that are only going to college, that is just another way the push kids to go to college. In high school, it could make the kids life easier. For example, maybe that poor kid is smart but his family doesn’t have much money. If he was making money for having good grades

According to http://www.debate.org/opinions/should-students-get-paid-for-good-grades it states “When students are paid for good grades, they learn that working hard and making good choices does have its rewards. They will try to make better grades, in the hopes of earning more money. Children will also learn responsibility and the value of money; rather than just

Getting paid for good grades maintains great scores in school. Students won't waste time or slack off during school since money is always resting on the back of there minds. For example, the article written by Lynnette Khalfani-Cox states that, “Motivation comes from a variety of sources. My students love to excel in school, and they also love to be financially rewarded for doing so.” If students benefit in their grades for earning money, then they will be much more successful. Studies found that cash incentives devote more students to do their work. Privately owned schools are even on board with this idea, and are

First, kids may not have good grades. Personally, I know a bunch of people with no A’s or B’s, or have a 2.5 gpa or lower. What would those kids get paid? Nothing? Either kids should be paid, good grades or not, or nobody should be paid at all. It’s really not fair to the kids with poor parents, or the kids who don’t get good grades. Also, what happens when the reward is no longer

Keeping kids grades up is very important to the school. There is more than one way to keep kids engaged in the classroom and promote good grades or effort on their work. The school can suggest a lot of things to get students to achieve a good academic performance level. They can offer rewards, such as a school currency system, periodic parties, treats for good academic performance, etc. Additionally, the school could suggest the outcomes of bad academic performance. The facts and the cold hard truth would definitely motivate kids to study to guarantee a successful future.

Or they could be suffering from issues that don’t even involve school, but from home which the cash for grades is no help at all. This is also just a poor way to solve a problem, because it just substitutes for the schools failed attempt at figuring out the main issue behind the lack of motivation, instead of actually finding a way to motivate students without the use of bribery. Also, if schools have to absolutely resort to using money to buy education they are just prolonging the fact that students will become even more unmotivated once the money is not enough for them to keep moving forward with their success.

Since every kid wants toys, shoes, clothes, etc. This program should happen because this motivates kids to go to school, try hard, get good grades and have a good GPA to go to college, For example, Imagine yourself as a school hating kid that loves fluffy bears. This program would give you enough motivation to try harder to get the money and buy his/her fluffy bear. This is only one reason why kids should be paid doing good in school.

Some school corporations need the $40,000,000, but can not get it because their school starts too early and the kids don’t come to school.

Some of which many people probably do not even know. One of these benefits includes the choices that are given to parents. In schools who fail to comply with state standards for two consecutive years, parents will then have the choice to remove their children from these schools and send them to a higher performing school in their same district (Choices for Parents). Students who decide to do so are provided with transportation to and from school using funds from the district (Choices for Parents). By providing transportation for kids to receive a higher quality education, we are helping to ensure each child the best education possible.

Money. Who doesn’t love money? This question is asked very often. In some schools, like Charter schools in California, students are actually getting paid based on good behavior and good attendance. These kids are not learning as well as they used to because they are getting paid. “Other critics note that students’ internal drive to learn may be sapped as they focus on getting an external reward.” (Jackson 2014) This topic is excruciatingly important because these students’ who are getting paid may be abusing the money and using it for bad stuff like drugs and alcohol. Students should not get paid to go to school because they will focus less on academics and will take easier classes just to get easy money.