Organ Donation : A Necessary Part Of The Healthcare Field Essay

Since that time donation has been the only way to increase the current supply of transplantable organs. Some people are uncomfortable with the idea of organ donation due to misconceptions and lack of knowledge. In fact, organ transplant recipient Dr. Phil H. Berry, Jr. points out that there would be less deaths of people waiting for transplants, “if Americans would overcome their reluctance to become organ donors” (29). Organ donation whether it is upon your death or giving a part of a liver or one kidney while you are alive is a charitable gesture towards your fellow man and could give meaning to the end of your life. The mere act of donating could bring more peace to your loved ones at the time of your death and as a result, you could give

According to United Network for Organ Sharing (2010) organ donations and transplantation are the removal of organs and tissues from one person and placed into another person’s body. The need for organ transplantation usually occurs when the recipient organ has failed (UNOS, 2010). Organ donation can save the lives of many individuals who are on the waiting list for an organ donation. Becoming an organ donor can be a difficult decision. Many people have the false beliefs about being an organ donor. An example would be if organ donor is on their driver’s license and a person is in a life-threatening accident everything will not be done to save their life. There is an increase need for organ donors and unfortunately the need for organ

In a world where life expectancy has increased tremendously over the last century because of new technology and medical procedures, we find humanity ever pushing the boundaries on what it can do to prevent loss of life where possible. One example is the area of organ donation and transplantation. However, unlike many other technologies or procedures which can be built, manufactured, or learned, organ transplantation requires one thing that we can’t create yet: an organ itself. Because our increased life span causes more people to require a replacement organ when theirs starts to fail, the demand has far outrun the supply and the future only looks to get worse. “Between the years 1988 and 2006 the number of transplants doubled, but the

The number of barriers to organ donation suggested by the participants was more than three times the number of benefits. Many of these barriers included medical mistrust, the desire for bodily integrity, and the “ick” factor.

Today the demand for organ transplantation is increasing; the need has outgrown the supply and the waiting lists are long. According to UNOS, currently 118,000 people are waiting for an organ transplant. There are more transplant specialists, the immune rejection has improved, more transplants are being performed than ever before and the future will demand even more.

Due to the growing needs of human organ transplant donors, many medical professionals have attempted to find means of encouraging the public to donate their organs. Therefore, some within the medical profession may suggested that compensation or incentives may help boost the number of organs donor, thus shortening the growing list of needed organs for transplant procedures. As a matter of fact, may individuals within this field consider this method to be ethical sound and efficient since it will encourage the donating of human organs of living and deceased patients (Cherry, 2009). Clearly, the reason why these medical professionals are striving to put this proposition into effect is because it could greatly lower the transplant waiting list. Hence it could possibly save the lives of individuals who are suffering from organ failure and have been

One organ donor can save or improve up to fifty lives. Kidneys, hearts, lungs, livers, and other major organs have been applicable for organ transplants. Doctors performed the first procedure of this kind in the mid-1950s and since sustained many lives, earning the common name a “gift of life.” These surgeries have led to many innovative procedures that can solve problems that once seemed insoluble. Medical advancements, such as transplants, are ethical and necessary for promoting the well-being of society and saving lives.

Introduction: Almost everyone would want to be able to say I have saved a life. But by becoming an organ donor, you can be able to say “I will save a life.” Organ donation is a selfless way to give back to others, and to be able to make a huge difference by giving another person a second chance at life. Unfortunately, the number of patients waiting for organs far exceeds the number of people who have registered to become organ donors. Patients are forced to wait months, even years for a match, and far too many die before they are provided with a suitable organ. There are many shames related to organ donation, but most of them are quite false, and in order to be well informed, you must know what organ donation is, how it works as well as

take a look at the current process of procuring organs for transplantation. It will also explore technology on the horizon and alternates to donation. The waiting list for transplant surgery far exceeds the current supply. Black Market organ trade in this, as well in foreign countries is alive and well. Donation is not able to keep up with demand. We have to take measures to ensure those in the most need are taken care of. We already allow people to sell eggs, sperm and blood why not other organs? I will attempt to show you that compensation for organs could reduce the time on the donor waiting list, lower crime rate by eliminating the need for a black market, and in general improve the quality of life for thousands of ill people. In the

When organs are taken from living donors and are transplanted there are also several pros and cons present. One disadvantage in live organ donation is the effect on the donor and any possible scenarios that could go wrong. When dealing with technically two patients, there is more room for adverse. An advantage to inter vivos donation is that in preparation for organ donation, there is no rush for time. Doctors are able to take more of their time to ensure the mental and physical state of the donor, as well as secure the antibody match. Another pro of obtaining organs from live donors is the Pro-Donation Behaviours Of Nursing Students From The Four Countries Of The UK. Interview study done to determine individual’s likeliness to donate organs. Live donation is viewed very different from postmortal donation because of the effects after donation, which when you donate once you are passed, that is not a worry.(6). What is interesting is that almost all of the Nursing students interviewed were already signed up to be donors, which leads to the inference

Currently, the Opt-in and Opt-out methods are used to encourage organ donations. The Opt-in option is when donors express their willingness to be an organ donor upon their death. Opt-out is when all citizens are automatically enrolled as organ donors unless an individual specially requests not to be a donor before death. Studies have found that countries with an Opt-out system have a higher number of organ donors. For example, Germany uses an Opt-in system with 12 percent consented donors, while Austria, which uses Opt-out system resulting in 99 percent consented donors. In the U.S., we offer the Opt-in system when people acquire driver's licenses with an elective to register online. Unfortunately, this Opt-in option does not include people who do not drive and people who cannot enroll online. A change in U.S. policy to the Opt-out method will ensure the Americans who want to register can automatically become an organ donor.

Having the chance to give a person life through donating an organ is selfless. However, many people have an aversion to becoming an organ donor. The reasons vary from personal reasons to very strict beliefs. An individual source can never determine the prime reason for a person’s choice not to donate an organ. Questions may arise on the ethics of these said people on if they should have the opportunity to receive an organ since they themselves are not donors. The opinions vary on this controversial topic; nevertheless, no individual should have the authority to decide who should live or die. The value of a life should not be merely measured in one’s personal views. The morals of humanity and equality play a central role in this decision.

Although anyone can donate their organs after death, New Zealand New Zealand’s organ donation rate is considerably lower compared to other courtiers in the world. According Organ Donation New Zealand (2017), there are approximately 550 people on current transplant waiting lists. In 2016 there were 61 donors resulting in approximately 200 transplant operations (ODNZ, 2017). As a result some of these 550 people on the transplant waitlist will die because there is simply not enough donors. The shortage of organ donation is a result of the shortcoming in the current organ donation policy.

Organ donation is always a hard decision to make before you pass away, and for your loved ones to make after you have passed away. People often misinterpret how organ donation works. In order for someone to want to be an organ donor they have to be able to understand all the facts about it. Not all people realize how important being an organ donor is. Three steps that everyone should go through before you decide where you stand on organ donation are understanding the facts from myths, understand the process of organ donation, and read at least one story of how organ donation has changed someone’s life. (Organ Donation Myths, Ten Facts, Twenty-Five Years After, Understanding The Donation Process)

Each year, thousands of people die while waiting for organ transplantation and hundreds of research studies examining the possible genetic causes of cancer, cardiovascular diseases, and neurodegenerative diseases are ended, both due to the lack of donated organs. Often times, we do not realize how much of a difference we can make to this issue, simply by becoming organ donors and donating our organs after death. This is the idea Snyder, Van Assche et al., and Kluge are trying to make in their articles. It is important to recognize how pathos, ethos, and logos are used in writing to understand the ways in which the author is persuading the readers to agree with their argument. In “Easy Rescues and Organ Transplantation”, “Governing the Postmortem Procurement of Human Body Material for Research”, and “Improving Organ Retrieval Rates”, Snyder, Van Assche et al., and Kluge use somber and earnest word choices and provide anecdotal evidence to inform the audience of the ethics that need to be involved in order to create a more successful system of organ donation.