Organ Donation And Organ Organs Essay

Recognized as one of the most gripping medical advances of the century, organ transplantation provides a way of giving the gift of life to patients with terminal failure of vital organs. Organ transplantation requires the participation of both fellow human beings and of society by donating organs from deceased or living individuals. The ever increasing rate of organ failure and the inadequate supply of organs have created a significant gap between organ supply and organ demand. This gap has resulted in extremely lengthy waiting times to receive an organ as well as an increased number of deaths among those waiting for an organ. These events have raised many ethical, moral and societal issues regarding supply, the methods of organ allocation and the use of living donors as volunteers including minors. It has also led to the practice of organ sale by entrepreneurs for financial gains in some parts the world through exploitation of the poor, for the benefit of the wealthy. This paper presents valuable information regarding organ transplantation while supporting the medical definition of the term “brain death”

Everyone will die someday. Death remains inevitable and unpreventable, yet the process of organ donation and transplantation prolongs life. Problems with the supply and demand of viable organs lead to controversial topics and debates regarding solutions to suppress the gap between donors and recipients. One prevalent debate concerning these problems follows the question of whether to allow non-donors to receive organ transplants if needed even though they aren’t registered to donate their own organs. Although denying non-registered organ donors the possibility to receive transplants could motivate more people to register, thus eliminating the scarcity of available organs, the ethical and moral dilemmas in denying people life-saving

In Sally Satel 's “When Altruism Isn 't Moral” discusses the problem with the outrageous expectation the healthcare system has for organ donation and reception. Satel says “it is lethally obvious that altruism is not a valid basis for transplant policy. If we keep thinking of organs solely as gifts, there will never be enough of them.” I agree with Satel; the social requirements that a donor has to meet before being able to donate an organ is too restricted and is one of the many issues with our current mindset when it come to the care of the dying. As well as having obnoxious requirements in the altruism-only system of donating, the actual system is faulty. This altruism-only system causes social dilemmas and problems not unlike the ones that people fear with a compensation/incentive donation program.

Today in the United States there are thousands of people currently waiting for some type of transplant. If one were to ask a group of people if they have friends or family who have either had a transplant or are waiting for one, one would find that most people know at least one person who has had a transplant or is waiting for one. Transplantation is a great advance in modern medicine. The need for organ donors is much larger than the number of people who sign up to donate their organs in the case of an accident. According to The Cleveland Clinic Foundation (1995-2009), "Every day in the United States 17 people die waiting for an organ and more than 80,000 men, women, and children await life-saving organ

There have been, for many years, a number of social, legal and ethical questions raised regarding organ donation and transplantation. However, as the science of medicine has developed over the years, so have patient care needs, the practice of medicine itself, and the laws implemented by the governments of various countries. Naturally, many of the ethical issues that face society, scientists, and doctors change, and therefore require careful scrutiny. Whilst the progression of scientific knowledge, technology and techniques have solved many of these ethical problems, a number of these issues still persist because medicine has not yet provided a solution or because society is reluctant to accept the solutions that have been suggested (Diethelm,

Many people agree that to take and use organs from another source is justifiable within certain ethical boundaries. However it is when the need for organ transplants becomes overwhelming that these initial boundaries are questioned and challenged. This would result in the death of many patients as well as harm to the donors.

Organ transplantation has been one of the most riveting medical advances of the century as it literally gives the chance of a lifetime to patients with terminal failure of vital organs. This requires the participation of other people in society to donate organs from their deceased family or even donations from living individuals themselves. The increasing incidence of vital organ failure and the inadequate supply of organs has created a wide gap between organ supply and demand. This has resulted in very long wait times to receive an organ as well as an increasing number of deaths while waiting. These events have raised many ethical, moral and societal issues regarding supply, the methods by which the organs are being allocated, and the use of living donors as volunteers. This paper will talk about the ethical and moral issues generated by the current advances in organ transplantation, the problem of organ supply versus organ demand, and the ethical dilemma behind allocating of the small amount of available organs being donated.

Human life is an extremely delicate balance to maintain, but through research the knowledge of medicine that increased through the decades that has helped improve lives. In the 18th century the life expectancy was 30 years old due to poor health, and it has more than double due to the advancements of the medical community. In the recent past, individuals that had a death sentence due to organ failure are now living past these disease associated with organ failure through the use of organ transplantation. Individuals can gain a much needed life change through a couple different routes such as from a living donor to living donor or through deceased donor to living donor. However, these changes in medicine have raised multiple ethical issue involved when dealing with organ donation such as the presumed consent (opting out system) or requested consent (opting in system), the compensation for organ donations and there are religious and cultural norms that the

Organ donation is a significantly selfless way to give back to the world, making a huge difference in a someone's life and giving them a second chance at prolonging their lives. People should be educated on the shortages there are for donations globally, they should also be aware of how many people can be impacted by this process. The donation of organs is not only an important decision to make for yourself, but it gives an opportunity to help save a life and create a second chance for others. Mutually, understanding why a person should donate will bring them closer helping others, specifically due to the lack of availability and the growing cause for organ donation. The core to understanding the background, the need for donations, the composition of donations, the importance and impact personally, and also the opposition of organ donation are key for the group that may not be primarily drawn to this type of service.

Have you ever thought about all the lives organ donors have saved? Maybe stopped to think about how families helped and friendships made through the act of receiving an organ in a crucial time? Thousands of people are currently waiting on organ donor registries. However, the number of donors is nowhere near equal to the number of organs needed. Organ donors should be compensated for their donation, because compensation would increase the quantity of available organs, decrease black market sales, and help grieving families with funeral costs.

Millions of people all over the world die each year due to organ failure; however, doctors have found a way to remedy this issue through organ donation, a process in which a person gives up a working organ for a patient in need. A few of the most common transplants performed are kidneys, livers, and lungs; donors may include both the living and the deceased. This process requires major, extensive testing and long periods of searching for organ matches. Medical professionals and ordinary citizens from all over the world argue whether people should receive a financial compensation for the donation of organs. Some people believe the donation process should be done simply because of moral values, while others feel organ donation should be rewarded in some form. Meanwhile, many people are dying due to a lack of available organs as this issue is being disputed. Because organ donation has become such a dire issue in the medical world, society has to institute a new method of saving lives.

If everyone became organ donors then it would not take so long for people who are on the transplant list to receive a good vital organ. If just a few people would sign up to become organ donors they could save so many men, women and children who are suffering from organ failure.

Organ donation is when a person authorizes an organ or any biological tissue of the human body to be surgically remove while the donor is still alive or after death. Organs and tissues that are transplantable will be removed in a surgical procedure and will be determine if they are suitable and can be used for transplantation. An organ transplantation is a surgical procedure in which an organ is removed from the donor’s body and placed in the recipient’s body. Organ donor is someone who is giving an organ or tissue to the recipient who is in need of a transplant while the beneficiary of the organ that will be donated from the organ donor is called the recipient. There are two kinds of organ donation: living donation and deceased donation. Living donation is when the organ donor is still alive while deceased donation is when the donation takes place after death.

Many people’s lives come to an end earlier than expected. When this happens, families mourn the loss of the loved one. However, do people mourn the loss of another life if the individual is not an organ donor? The National Kidney Foundation believes that “legalizing payments of human organs” should continue to be opposed, as codified in the third title of the National Organ Transplant Act. (220). If this title is changed, then there will be multiple unexpected side effects that could corrupt the system of organ donation to people who need the organs. What exactly would define the price of saving a life? Who is paying the cost of the organ? Many things could backlash from the beginning of financially compensating people for their organs. This specific concept subtly generates monetary issues between the donor and the receiver of the organ, takes advantage of the poor, increases funeral costs, creates problems with trading organs, is inconsistent in moral values, and increases an untrust of health care. Thus, financial compensation for organs should be banned.

The debate over whether getting compensated for the donation of organs is just stirs up moral, religious, and ethical opposition as well as scary hypotheticals. There are many factors to think about when introducing a new market; the biggest being corruption. An unregulated market for the sale of organs opens the doors to potential exploitation and fuels the fire for the black market of organ trafficking. The concern on ethics relates to human dignity. Selling human organs encompasses the possibility of dehumanizing people, essentially forcing them into being seen as a commodity, property, or price. These voiced thoughts address some of the negative possibilities, but nonetheless, the possibilities are just possibilities not absolute effects. The organ shortage continues as the need of organ donors rises. Amid this crisis, there has been a push to persuade more people to donate their and their loved one’s cadaveric organs. However, these efforts seem to be futile, because the gap between supply-and-demand swells each year. The top priority is to increase the number of transplants thus decreasing deaths and ending the suffering of people on dialysis. From all the opposition and speculation, people tend to forget that organ transplantations save lives. They are so blinded by their moral and religious values