Organ Donation Is The Surgical Removal Of Organs Or A Tissue Transplant?

Every day some dies after waiting years on a transplant list. The National Organ Transplant Act of 1984 says that in the United States, the sale of organs is illegal. Some believe this act may be preventing thousands of people from getting the organs that will save their lives. The truth is every day someone dies and their organs could be used to help others and everyday a life of one and the livelihood of another could be saved. The reasons for allowing the sale of organs is very simple to understand. It can help others financially, save money on medical expenses and most importantly, save lives. Critiques believe this would be a mistake causing spur of the moment decisions, and illegal obtain these organs for sale. With the use of regulation, these doubts can be laid to rest. Before the problem can be solved, the problem has to be identified.

Kishore also notes that the reason for permitting the sale of organs is not to better the health quality of the sellers or to reward them “a long term economic benefit”, as assumed. Comparable monetary or health benefits don’t occur in charitable contributions either, but they are acceptable. The decisions for allowing the sale of organs are set in the interest of saving the lives of incurably ill patients with the help of accessible medical expertise and

Dissection of the human cadaver has been used as a teaching tool for many centuries. While there are many ethical concerns in the study of human anatomy and physiology. The biggest controversy that exists with the use of human tissue in the “Bodies, The Exhibit” is if that deceased person consented to have their bodies publicly displayed.[1] I too visited the “Bodies, The Exhibit” many years ago, to me this was an amazing learning experience as I saw how human bodies were preserved and what our bodies really look like under our skin. I had no idea at the time where the bodies came from? I imagined that people had given prior consent to be displayed in such way. However; many analysts concluded that exhibits that display human cadavers had not previously obtained a consent from the deceased or their family members [1]. As a results many states have banned such exhibits in

Since the WHO is not, in any way, going to lift the ban, and one of the most efficient ways to increase the supply of available organs for the thousands of people on organ waiting lists is to make some form of donation and selling legal, other options must be sought-after. By combining two opposing viewpoints it is possible for a whole new approach to this rapidly growing problem to transpire, for there may be more agreeable aspects than what meets the eye.

Organ transplantation is a term that most people are familiar with. When a person develops the need for a new organ either due to an accident or disease, they receive a transplant, right? No, that 's not always right. When a person needs a new organ, they usually face a long term struggle that they may never see the end of, at least while they are alive. The demand for transplant organs is a challenging problem that many people are working to solve. Countries all over the world face the organ shortage epidemic, and they all have different laws regarding what can be done to solve it. However, no country has been able to create a successful plan without causing moral and ethical dilemmas.

There is a well-established industry for the buying and selling of organs to those who are in dire need of a transplant, both legally and illegally, in many different countries. The legalization of the sale of organs in the United States would have serious consequences and raises many ethical dilemmas- regardless of religious beliefs. There are several ideas presented in this paper that present the issues that have hindered the progression of the legalization of organs. Currently, there is an organ waiting list of 123,897 patients on the organ recipient list ,the number of transplant that have actually occurred in January - August 2014 are 19,426 (Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network). There is no denying that there is a significant gap between the number of transplant surgeries performed and those awaiting a donor. The ever growing need for these lifesaving organs is clear, but to allow human beings to sell parts of their body is not the solution to this complex problem.

Working Thesis: Organ Donors should be able to have the right to choose if their organs after death will be donated to another without any complications even if they die of brain death or euthanasia, inside or outside a medical facility, as well as laws should be put in place or an alternative method stating that their wishes no matter what the family thinks, due to ethical or moral issues, should be honored.

Organ donation could save the life of so many Individuals. One organ donor can save or significantly improve the lives of a minimum of seven others (Morgan, 2004). There has been a severe shortage in the availability of organ for transplantation. Presently, more than 40,000 patients in the United States are expecting organ transplants and it is guesstimated that about 60,000 people die yearly due to limited availability of organ for transplantation (Skumanich et al., 1996). The demand for organ donor is rising as transplant surgery turn out to be increasingly popular and successful in saving the lives of many individuals. Card

Organ donation has been perceived as an effective way of curing chronic illnesses that were fatal in the past. As a portrayal of medical progress, it reflects the concatenated efforts of medical research that has paved way for better health in the society. Vast efforts have been placed by various governmental and non-governmental organizations to enhance successful transplantation as well as the identification of donors. Although instances of organ rejection are occasional, continuous improvement has reduced these patterns. Mainly, there are two approaches through which organs for transplant are acquired. The first way is the donation of an organ by a living

Donating an organ, whether it is before or after dead, is seen by society as the right thing to do, but at what cost. Being asked to become an organ donor right before getting our license is almost always a yes. Death is one of the farthest things from our mind and when we are asked this question we would rather live life knowing our organs could be used to save someone’s life. But this simple checkmark or heart can sometimes be used against us; because there are so many people waiting for an organ, doctors have been given the ability to stretch the fine line between life and death. Not signing the donor card can gives us a few more bargaining space. Although both Crystal Lombardo and Dick Teresi speak about the effects of organ donation, Lombardo, author of “11 Major Pros And Cons Of Organ Donation”, points out the importance of becoming an organ donor, while Teresi, author of “What You Lose When You Sign That Donor Card”, describes the complications between doctor and patient.

With the rapid development of science and technology, When people's organs fail, doctors will use organ transplants to replace end-stage organ failure with special treatment to help patients get rid of death. Typically，some countries use organ donation to help people to get a healthy body. However, according to the article written by Mark J. Cherry, “The shortage of organs is virtually a universal problem.” (Cherry, 2005) . Hence, a small number of human organs donations cannot meet the growing demand and a phenomenon that leads to the sale and sale of organs in society. Furthermore, Cherry said that “the purchase and sale of transplant organs from live donors are prohibited in many countries.” (Cherry, 2005). There are three main reasons the

Proponents of this view argue that it is a rational approach; financial incentive is needed to supply enough organs and that this is “favoring the living over the dead”. (Joralemon, 1995:345). The mechanistic framework places great importance in personal autonomy, which includes the right to freely dispose of one’s own body. This is a central aspect when it comes to decision-making regarding organ transfer as this means that you are free to sell your organs if you want to but also that no one should be able to persuade you into selling them. In the focus groups, ownership over one’s own body did not automatically approve of earning money with your own body parts. That type of commercialization was seen as a risk of convincing people do what they otherwise would not and thus interfering with individual autonomy (Schweda and Schicktanz, 2009:4-5). The proponents of an organ market also argue that others, such as medical staff and procurement professionals, profits from the organ transfer, why shouldn’t the donor or the donor kin do as well? (Joralemon, 1995:345) A mechanistic view removes all emotional linkage to organs and by extension also the donor, who becomes merely a source of parts. This approach is convenient because it is seen in other parts of society. An object is valued after its demand and how it can be utilized and if organs are viewed as objects they are as valuable as the demand for

The medical science of organ transplantation has opened the gates of salvation for many human bodies. For the pure-intentioned, organs are a renewable resource that should be passed from one person to another when needed. In this manner, lifespans can be extended ethically and without excessive tragedy. Unfortunately, there are organizations and even nations that exploit the science of organ harvesting for profit. Before entering that debate, however, I would like to set the stage for my research paper by providing an overview of the topic I intend to cover.

Once a person is deceased, their organs, if qualified within the health guidelines, can save lives or stay with the cadaver. A dead person

The sale of human organs in return for compensation is a very controversial topic. It is also illegal in most countries; however, it is not uncommon for organs of the deceased or living to be sold on what is known as a “black market” of organ trading/selling. Curdling Ireland stated “Is a global market for organ sales the answer? Can a for-profit system exist, save lives, and still not exploit the poor?” (Harvard Gazette, 2008) this is a question that has been brought to the highest judicial system in many countries to be discussed further. The courts focus on the immoral and ethical issues with making the sale organs legal in their countries. This results in the illegal practice of selling organs for compensation.