Organic Farming Vs Organic Foods

Over the last few years, awareness of organic food has risen. Due to this, the demand for organic food is a factor which is influencing the farmers to switch to use this technique, and it is being sold in specialty stores and conventional supermarkets. Organic products contain numerous marketing claims that it is healthier, it offers more value, and the farming is more environmentally friendly than traditional foods, so, how does one determine if organic is the way to go? Some argue that there is evidence that supports and demonstrates why organic foods and farming are better overall, while others insist that conventional foods and agriculture can offer the same benefits as going organic. There is no right or wrong answer. Within this

In order to establish eating the healthiest foods possible, any individual can shop for organic foods that have “organic” labels on them. Organically grown foods have an immense amount of pure nutrients and healthier ingredients than GMO food. This high-quality alternative accomodates a healthy and safe lifestyle. The ultimate gain of health is indulged by considering a wise decision such as consuming organic foods and products. Diverse organic produce generates health benefits that outweigh the price premiums associated with it. Due to countless usage of unadapted chemicals, crops are evidently damaged and captivated with extremely toxic pesticides and insecticides. Recently, GMO foods have severely

Genetic modification of organisms is something the human race has been doing for thousands of years, starting with the first domestication of animals around 10,000 years ago. (Root, 2) Many of these genetic alterations were at a basic level, an example of this being the cross breeding of dogs to achieve desirable traits. Additionally, importation of new plants or animals into areas they didn’t historically come form, forced adaptations from these organism to survive. More recently, scientists have begun to understand genetic engineering at the DNA level, and expand its use into the altering of plants genetic code. (Goldbas) Scientists are now gaining insight into

This finding became the foundation of the genetic modification process. In 1983, the first transgenic plant was created. Scientists were able to create a tobacco plant that could resist anti-biotic. Shortly after this creation, genetically engineered cotton was effectively field tested in 1990. Five years later, Monsanto the leading biotech company, released herbicide-immune soybeans. Finally, the promising science of genetic modifications was improved even further in 2000 with the discovery that the modification process could be used to bring vitamins and nutrients to enhance foods.

People from around the world, different ages and ethnicity, no matter of their social status, want to be healthy. Being healthy means being happy. The main ingredient for a wellness recipe starts from the foods and drinks that people consume every single day of their lives. Yet, not all the food can be assumed as a source of energy for peoples ' healthfulness. Nowadays, scientific progression experiments have made a revolutionary step into an unbelievable and kind of nitty-gritty discovery, which was released to the public as Genetically Modified Organisms (GMOs). Although, the basic information and the description of what GMOs are and what the specificity of it is, was not accompanied with the mass-presented GMOs food. According to a book, Genes on the Menu: Facts for Knowledge-Bases Decisions written by author Paul Pechan, the basic facts and introduction of GMOs was described. Pechan stated, "A genetic engineering procedure where a gene from one, sometimes unrelated, organism is transferred to another…", which is how Genetically Modified Organisms occurred in the actual world (3). Along with this statement, it was specified that by making such modifications, it "…can give a plant a new property, like resistance to insects or virus attack and tolerance to herbicides" and that was a particularity of GMO crops (Pechan 3). Although GMOs crops were extensively released for public use, people have to know and be informed of what the hidden truth is behind the GMOs. The

Food is a vital source for survival, and with a growing population that is likely to reach a total of 9,000 million by 2050, the use of biotechnology in farming for food production should be considered. The most efficient solution to solve the global food shortage might be to rely on science and technology. Though there are many controversies regarding the use of genetically-modified (GM) food, it could be the best solution. Though I support the idea of GM foods, I do believe those who enjoy organic foods should have the option to continue with it. Both organic and GM food supply should be used to suit both sides of the controversy.

Modifying plants, and their genes, is not something new. Ever since humans first began to grow their own plants, around 10,000 years ago, we 've changed the plants quite a bit (Erdosh, G., & Lusted, M. A., 2014). Bananas used to be difficult to eat, as they were packed full of inedible seeds; corn consisted of only a few hard kernels on the end of a stick and was only found in parts of southern Mexico; Watermelon used to be extremely bitter. You can see the potential of genetic modification if you look at the average supermarket tomato. These tomatoes have been bred selectively, for almost a hundred years, to produce a product capable of going into commercial production. Meaning, the tomato plants have been bred to: increase durability, increase uniformity, provide larger fruit, provide higher yield, and aren 't as flavorful. If you compare them to heirloom tomatoes, you 'll notice they haven 't been bred for commercial production, but for flavor and aroma. Heirloom tomatoes are not fit for mass commercial production,

For thousands of years, genetically modification microorganism has affected many of the products humans eat every day. It began with the tameness of animals. As humans grew into an agricultural company, they start breeding different strains of plants looking to receive the best possible plants for sustenance for people. But as a scientific understanding of breeding and technology grew their methods of altering plants and animals changed. Instead, of breeding two similar types of creatures or plants together, scientists and engineers can immediately modify the transmitted sequence of the DNA of a species. Altering plants and specific crops for food supply has raised many ethical and possible safety issues with the consumers that need to be discussed.

Each new generation has become increasingly wary of the products they consume due to the escalating concerns about personal health and longevity. As a result of this trend, the consumption of organic produce has been inflating in the recent years. Consumers assume that anything labeled with “organic” on it is deemed to be superior as they are plagued with the belief that organic goods possess numerous benefits to one’s health and the environment. As these reasons are spread around between consumers, genetically modified organisms (also known as GMOs) have grown a bad reputation amongst health advocates as being inferior to organic produce. However, people fail to see that there are no significant differences between GMOs and organic produce that justify making the latter a preferred choice in the market. In fact, scientific evidence even suggests that GMOs can be considered better than organic produce as they are found to be preferable for varying reasons, such as being more beneficial to the environment and being higher quality. Therefore, consumers need to suspend their suspicions of genetically modified produce being a subpar product that supposedly results in detrimental effects, compared to organically

In these couple of years, people’s attention have focused on the word ”Genetically Modified Organisms”. From the cows that produce milk for us to drink to wheat and rice which are the main staple food for the world’s population, GMO has affected all aspects of our lives; It seems that we cannot “escape” from the intrude of GMO. Even the times of searching GMO on Google was tripled since the end of 2012. Most people do have negative perspectives on GMO and believe it will damage our health and the nature. We, however, cannot ignore the benefits we earned from it. This essay will address the “for and against” of the use of GMO.

Genetically Modified Crops has become an immensely controversial topic throughout the world. Many people do not even know what a GM crop is. Marlena Liggett states in her article “Genetically Modified Crops: Sensible Ingredients” that, “Even though there are many controversies surrounding genetically modified crops, they are beneficial to society, and their production should not be abandoned” (35). Liggett focuses on the reasons why the research on genetically modified crops should be continued. She discusses the common controversies known about GM crops such as if human consumption of them is harmful and issues with labeling GM crops. From there she discusses the advantages such as herbicide tolerance and insect resistance. She ends the article discussing the progress that has been made with GM crops within the past 10 years or so. In this paper I will be discussing Liggett’s thoughts about genetically modified crops and my opinion that her arguments are partially true pertaining to the advantages and disadvantages of genetically modified crops.

Advocates and opponents have made very contrasting claims about the benefits and potential risks of GMOs, and each pointed to their own favourite pieces of evidence without any straight answer. In general, agro-biotechnologist advocates and crop science companies promote the use of GM technology as a risk-free alternative to enhance food quality in particular and for the overall economic benefits at large (Nelson, 2001). On the other hand, opponents including some scientist and environmentalist view the application of genetic modification in food crops as a lethal interference between the realm of nature and human leading to unknown health hazards, socioeconomic risks and regulatory constraints (Nelson, 2001). Incidentally, the nature of GM debate among the public and the experts is exceptionally different (Hansen et al., 2003). While consumers are more focused on tangible benefits such as price, features and tangible benefits of GM foods, expert’s differences of opinion are concentrated mostly in three major areas a) the safety regimes for both human and environment; b) regulatory framework of GMOs in local as well as international context and c) the allied economic constraints of commercialisation of GMOs (Paarlberg, 2002). Thus, literature cited in the present study are subdivided in accordance with these three major areas of conflict among the experts, including a brief discussion about the role of the media in GM

The argument of whether or not people should eat GMO (Genetically Modified Organism) or organic foods has been a debate for a long time. Organic food benefits health far more than genetically modified food that contains pesticides and animals that are raised on antibiotics growth hormones. Non-GMO foods are also safer for the environment in many ways: it conserves water, reduces soil erosion, increases soil fertility, reduces pollution, uses less energy, and does not affect the animals that live close to farms or graze on the farm like birds and chickens (Robinson). Yet GMO’s are beneficial society as food is produced in abundance and due to herbicides plant epidemics are not as common as they use to be. There are both positives and negatives to both sides of the argument, but there is common ground to be reached and identified.

Are organic foods healthier than conventional foods? Do they give you a longer life than conventional foods? Have you stopped and wondered how the conventional foods are made aka those foods you eat everyday? Can you wonder why or how you get cancer and disease mysteriously coming to your life? No matter how good you try to eat with those conventional foods it still contain pesticide and toxins? Organic foods are healthier than conventional foods because organic foods is better for your body,organic foods better for the environment,organic foods doesn’t cause cancer and disease.

According to the World Health Organization (2014. 1), "Genetically modified organisms (GMOs) can be defined as organisms (i.e. plants, animals or microorganisms) in which the genetic material (DNA) has been altered in a way that does not occur naturally by mating and/or natural recombination. The technology is often called 'modern biotechnology ' or 'gene technology ', sometimes also 'recombinant DNA technology ' or 'genetic engineering '. Foods produced from or using GM organisms are often referred to as GM foods.” Many organic crops farming farmers are against cultivating of GM crops because of the threat to farm land and environment however, biotechnology companies and GM crops growing famer desire to have profit and consumer look for low price. Thus, the debate over the environmental impact of genetically modified GM crops is growing. Although GM crops negatively affects on some organism in environment, they reduce the use of pesticides and increase crop yield.