Organizational Management Approach Analysis At High Plain Mechanical Service Inc.

FG, personal communication, March 1, 2015). The telemetry floor manager is responsible for all aspects of the unit’s operation and management. Mr. FG main job duty is to ensure the floor runs smoothly without any obstacles while providing the best possible patient care. Mr. FG currently has 78 employees (including charge nurses, staff educator, staff nurses, nurse aids, and secretaries) who report to him and he is directly responsible for. Mr. FG delegates some of the daily functions of the unit to the charge nurses, so that the unit runs smoothly while he focuses on other important his other duties. Mr. FG consider himself very professional and approach his staff member in a very professional manner and expects his staff maintaining the same professionalism with him and other team member. He also expect his staff to work as team and resolve any issue on the floor to the best of their ability in this manner. Even though his position as a manager on the floor to lead the team, but whenever there is a problem, he would like his every single member of his staff to be onboard to come up with a solution. Encourages everyone to talk to him whenever they feel the need and known for maintain an open door policy (Mr. FG, personal communication, March 1, 2015). Mr. FG reports directly to Chief Nursing Officer and the vice president of patient care services.

Even though the workers are supposed to work for 8 hours per day, the normal work hours for them is 11-12 hours. In addition to this, they have to fulfill 2-5 hours of compulsory

Successful management requires an understanding of the fundamental concepts of effective management techniques and principles. In order to gain such insight, and manage effectively and efficiently, managers must develop an awareness of past management principles, models and theories. From the turn of the 20th Century, the

To conduct a stable, successful, and developmental business, it is significant to understand what the management perspectives are, because they will help managers to achieve those business goals. After developing and testing of the management perspectives by managers, the classical perspective is the evolution of modern management. During the 19th and early 20th centuries, managers started seeking a way to improve productivity, lower the costs and also use more machines to produce high quantity products. However, the workers would not satisfied with their working conditions. However, after all the evolution

Management has not always been the way it is as of today. There were many people that warped and shaped the ideals of management throughout history. A few of those people are Adam Smith, Henry Fayol, Mary Parker Follett, and Henry Gantt. We see many of their principles and theories in modern management techniques. I have personally seen their effects in my management experiences. Another company that has great management ideals is Zappos.

A number of different major schools of management thoughts have been emerged since 100 years ago. Various views of management have been arisen and affected the managerial skills both in the past and the present.

Examples of good management are still being witness in some of the old civilizations, which are found by archaeologist. Later as civilizations started to grow and started gaining knowledge about human needs and requirement more specific research started to took place to improves life’s of people there was more to offer then to loose later in the 17th century the needs of the people started to grow and people started looking different ways to be ahead of one another that actually affected the way in which then require more proper way to handle situations as demand started to grow and it was becoming difficult for small organizations to handle growing needs of developing world which lead to rise of industrial revolution it started with

Classical management theory came into recognition in the early 1900s during the industrial revolution when there were issues relating to factory systems. Problems arose, as managers were uncertain in dealing with increased labour dissatisfaction and were unsure of an appropriate method in training employees (Cliffnotes.com,n.d.). This resulted in managers developing and testing possible solutions, one of which was to focus on the efficiency of the work process, which is now known as the classical theory approach (Business.com,2011). Moreover, scientific management and bureaucracy are two major sub-groupings of this management theory. In this essay, I will aim to discover if Taylor’s management theory of scientific management and Weber’s management theory of bureaucratic management are still applied by organisations. This will be done by explaining the principles of each of the management theories and then examples of modern organisations and real life examples will be given.

Historical Foundations of management have been around for years and were first introduced by Fayol around the turn of the century . This essay will discuss three main points and questions around management, the first question will cover how modern management practices have evolved from the “classical approaches to management”. The second question will cover the challenges contemporary managers face in 2013 compared to managers in the era of the classical approaches and the third question will be around comparing and contrasting bureaucratic management to a style of management I have been faced with. This discussion will pay particular attention to Frederick Taylor’s scientific approach to management.

In this paper, I will be examine the management approach my organizations takes, comparing and contrasting it to one of the historical approach. Additionally, I will analyze this approach to determine how effective the management style is.

The origins of management roots back to the time of ancient Egypt, where they started build the pyramids. Obviously, they needed to have

Business need not to suffer from consequences of substandard goods. The goals of organization should remain vigilant to improve on the products they offer. It is common that many large organizations supply their clients with products that are not to the standard that they claim or advertise them to be having. This results in their clients having problems with these substandard good consequently forcing them to go to the homes and offices of the clients to try and fix the problems. The idea behind the large organization releasing into market products is to create something of great value and what satisfies the customers, however the organization has failed to do so. This has caused problems to organization and customers, making customers to solve the problem by themselves. Therefore, this paper evaluates these problems from economic, social responsibility and ethics perspective of view.

We will examine the evolution of management beginning with the timeframe of the industrial revolution thru today’s management. Management theories included in this time contains the Human Relations/ Behavioral School of Management, Classical School of Management, Contingency Approach, the Scientific Approach, Theory X and Y, and Theory Z. The present style and classical style of management will be compared and contrasted to each other and how they apply to my job.

The evolution in management studies has grown significantly due to the appearance of the information technologies. In contrast, the classic management practices became less effective in many organisations. Historically, the industrial revolution generated most of the managerial principles. For instance, the financial department concern about the return on investment, while the marketing department focuses in the marginal profit and market shares. The strategic division pursue a competitive positioning and profitability, whereas the human resource department concern about the employees ' motivation, rewards and performance. It could be argue that management is the foundation of organization success by which means if the overall activities

Growth and change in nature and structure of organizations have made the ability of management to develop new approaches vital. Since the end of 19th century the conception of an organization has evolved and altered into various forms. When discussing classical management models, it is of great importance to take into consideration that they originated in past, not current economic and social conditions. Therefore, implementing a clear classical approach could hardly lead to anything else but the reasons for the necessity of its very change in the past. On the other hand, modern management models are a result of decades long development in the management practice. Understanding the basic models they originated from makes a manager more