Organizational Social Life in Urban Places: An Ethnographic Argument

991 Words4 Pages
How organization social life urban places play ethnography Anderson argues that common rhythms of societal response can be identified in similar public spaces. It is clear that the way individuals behave in noisy environments where they are constantly avoiding interaction with objects and bodies differs from convivial mingling. Alternatively, Anderson claims that places that exhibit similar patterns of vitality, usage, and organization have similar social traits (Anderson 67). To illustrate this, relatively busy and safe spaces open any frenzy is given slight regulation regardless of whether these spaces are libraries, museums, retail centers, squares, or parks. It appears that these places are marked by the ethos of researched trust in the situation. Mechanisms are used to negotiate bodies and space in these environments. These mechanisms appear to render the familiar strange and the strange familiar. Transactions are carried out in a safe and efficient manner: threat resulting from anticipation of violence, anxiety, and fear is always avoided. The participants have appreciated the benefits consciously and tactful in public places. Social experiences in public places domesticate diversity and complexities in urban places (Burfeind 18). Forgetting of the social and cultural accomplishments are likely to occur because of the myriad self-interest, rapid and continual influx, increased unfamiliarity and cities of immense diversity. This pattern of collective response has

More about Organizational Social Life in Urban Places: An Ethnographic Argument

Open Document