Organizational Socialization and Job Satisfaction

In an era of organizational flux due to competition and globalization, companies and employees are faced with constant change. Leaders must be able to adapt to change as the environment shifts. HR has been known as the organizational change agent, administrative expert, and employee advocate. More recently they have been regarded as business strategic partners for many organizations. In order to be successful and remain competitive in today’s market, Human Resources (HR) must be considered a strategic partner if an organization wants to flourish. Top executives today commit significant resources to ensure that their company’s functions are capable of rapid change and achieving their

2000 studies have been published on job satisfaction since the 1950’s (Kahn, 1972). Job satisfaction refers to an employee’s feelings towards their job based on the comparison between actual versus desired outcomes (Locke, 1969). Each individual experiences various levels of job satisfaction due to their different expectations towards their job

Based on the findings of the researchers, organizational commitment can be defined as the strength of an individual’s identification with the goals of an

Organizational commitment is one of the widely researched areas among Researchers, psychologist and human resource management practitioners. The objectives will be presented the study about to analyze the relationship between overall job satisfaction and organizational commitment. The focus will be the study towards analyzing the general behavior of the private sector employees towards work motivation and job satisfaction which may build higher levels

This artifact gave me the opportunity to analysis and synthesis twenty years of literature relating to historical trends, research, and theories and apply them to current HRD practices. A knowledge of the field of HRD and its historical development is not enough. It is essential as a practitioner to see the relationships between practice guidelines and the strategies of HRD as they relate to organizational benefits. This artifact

There are three separate dimensions to organizational commitment: 1. Affective commitment is an emotional attachment to the organization and a belief in its values. For example, a Petco employee may be affectively committed to the company because of its involvement with animals. 2. Continuance commitment is the perceived economic value of remaining with an organization. An employee may be committed to an employer because she is paid well and feels it would hurt her family to quit. 3. Normative commitment is an obligation to remain with the organization for moral or ethical reasons. An employee spearheading a new initiative may remain with an employer because he feels he would “leave the employer in the lurch” if he left." (Robbins & Judge, 2011, p 77)

Job satisfaction is a very simple concept in organizational behavior. It is simply a yes or no question. Is an individual satisfied with their current employment.

Often HRD professionals can be overlooked as the go unseen to other larger parts of a organization. But they are necessary for keeping a entity together and working as a whole, as they bring a organization together providing needs assessments as a tool to further growth, expansion, and enhancement. HRD professionals are crucial during times of restructuring and rebuilding, as they are used in the repair process of building new goals and expectations for the work force. Acting as a bridge between management and task forces, HRD professional provide curtail analysis and feedback to all areas of companies. Conveying wants, needs, concerns, and feedback for improvement between areas of the

Smith et al.(1969) treated job satisfaction both as a general attitude and as satisfaction with five specific dimensions: pay, work, promotion, supervision, and co-workers. According to Pareek (1989), stated organizational climate is cre¬ated by the perception of organizational members about the out¬come of interactions among five components of the organization. These interaction components are Structure, System, Culture, Leader behaviour, and employees’ psychological needs. Allen & Meyer, (1990) O’Reiily & Chatman, (1986) stated The Organizational commitment refers to the psychological attachment of workers to their workplaces Commitment to organizations is positively related to such desirable outcomes as job satisfaction (Bateman& Stasser, 1984; Mowday, Porter, & Steers, 1982), motivation (Mowday, Steers,& Porter,1979), and attendance (Mathieu & Zajac, 1990; Steers & Rhodes, 1978) and negatively related to such outcomes as absenteeism and turnover (Clegg, 1983; Cotton & Tuttle,1986). Also, Horton stated that stronger commitment could result in less turnover and absenteeism, thus increasing an organization’s productivity (Schuler & Jackson, 1996, p.302). However, the relationship between organizational commitment and

When a person comes to work each day, they are required to perform their job duties to the best of their ability. However, how a person performs these duties each day depends on how much they like or dislike their occupation. Job satisfaction affects job performance and turnover rates. “Job satisfaction essentially reflects the extent to which an individual likes his or her job. Formally defined, job satisfaction is an effective or emotional response toward various facets on one’s job (Kinicki & Fugate, 2016, pg. 57).” It is possible a person only likes part of his or her job though. Job satisfaction has five predominant models. These models are: was need fulfillment met, are expectations met, values, equity (fairness), and dispositional/ genetic components. Job satisfaction also affects attitudes and

Organizational commitment is one of the two individual outcomes derived from individual mechanisms like job satisfaction, stress, motivation, trust, justice, ethics, and learning and decision making. These mechanisms and outcomes can be found on the integrative model of organizational behavior (OB). Colquitt, LePine, and Wesson defined organizational commitment in their Organizational Behavior 5th Edition book as the desire of an employee to remain a member of the organization (p 64).

“Compare the difference between job satisfaction and organizational commitment.” Job satisfaction is how happy an individual is with his or her job, their supervisors, coworkers, and the job itself. According to our textbook, organizational commitment is “the strength of an individual’s identification with an organization.” (Nelson and Quick, p.61) In some cases, the individual may not enjoy or like certain areas of their job, which can affect job satisfaction also. “There are five dimensions which can lead to satisfaction on the job, they are challenging work, valued rewards, opportunities for advancement, competent supervision, and supportive coworkers.” (Nelson and Quick, p.58)

Many may argue that job satisfaction and organizational commitment are the same, but they are actually different.

Learning and development in the context of organizational development is having an essential role in achieving strategic human resourcing outcome. From attraction and retention, to development and utilisation of human capital, Human Resource Development (HRD) is the centre of strategic focus in HRM. This essay aims to present and discuss a strategic model of HRD activities in organisations.

Organizational commitment is critical to organizations due to the desire to retain a strong workforce. Organizations want to know why employees stay or leave their organizations so if correction is needed they have some tools to proceed with the correction. High turnover of employees in an organization can determine if an organization is successful or not. While turnover is related to all three areas of commitment researchers have determined that Affective commitment is one most associated with absenteeism and organizational citizenship (Williams J. 2004).