Organizational Structures

The paper is divided into three sections, the first of which will establish a timeline of events. This project background will serve as a case study for the analysis in the following section that will be structured such that each of the previously mentioned facets will be independently analyzed and contrasted with project management principles. Finally the paper will conclude with a summary of the analysis and recommendations based on

The company is geographically located in most major united states locations. It employs a hierarchal organizational design. One of the contributing factors to its success is the company’s success in providing a dining experience for its customers that excel in choices, price, customer service, and serving size. The company is known world-wide for its delicious cheesecakes with the key factor being the variety.

The Matrix Organization structure will be used to complete this project plan. The General Manager will

Multi Projects Inc. has moved away from the traditional hierarchy structure of organisations that have leaders and various sub departments reporting upward and opted on a new-economy approach by adopting a matrix organisational structure. Even though this is a very forwarding thinking approach, it does come with its own challenges that have been highlighted in detail under the section “Problems and their causes”.

Projects are used today as a way of achieving a variety of outcomes in local or international locations for new constructions, new product development, product improvement, process design, process improvement, utility installation, theory and technology development, and many more. Bringing a project to a successful conclusion requires the integration of numerous management functions like controlling, directing, team building, communication and others. It also requires cost and schedule management, technical and risk management, conflict and stakeholder 's management, and life cycle management.

Everyone on the team shares the processes for performing project work, communication, conflict resolution, and decision making. The projectized structure enhances project productivity and efficiency because more time can be devoted to doing work rather than creating systems to support doing the work.

Any successful project management, regardless of the organizational structure, is only as good as the individuals and leaders who are managing the key functions. Project management is not a single-person operation; it requires a group of individuals dedicated to the achievement of a specific goal.

Business has changed in the past 20 or so years. Products are being produced more rapidly and with the introduction of globalization competition has become more abundant. There is a need to become more customer focused but at the same time quicker to market while still reducing cost. Doing business the old way is just not cutting it anymore. Project management gives companies the ability to focus on many things at once without losing focus on their core business model. Processes become projects that have a start and finish and can be tracked and quantified

There seems to be no any other organizational structure more efficient than matrix in this project-based business. As pointed out earlier, matrix organizational structure is most suitable for corporations which exist in environments which cannot be easily predicted, are pressurized to meet their customer needs and requirements quickly. Medical Countermeasure Systems is a good example of such companies. Furthermore, the organizational culture of MCS impels it to assume this form management form (Dartey-Baah,

“A matrix organizational structure represents the middle ground between functional and project structures. Personnel often report both to a functional manager and one or more project managers” (Schwalbe, 2014). In the CDB project Corporate Banking, Corporate Trust, and Consumer banking involve to this project. Project Management Office is a good way to coordinate the contradiction between those divisions.

1. Discuss the project management organization on the project. Strengths? Weaknessess? Recommendations. Parks Corporation used a matrix project management organization on the Blue Spider Project. It was a multi-disciplinary team where the members came from different functional units such as Research and Development, Engineering, Manufacturing, Quality Control, Purchasing, and Finance. Gary Anderson, the Project Manager, was responsible for the project but his responsibility for performance of the individual phases of the work to be accomplished on the project remained with the functional managers. Anderson assigned, monitored, and coordinated work among the project team. But, the functional managers had

There are several advantages and disadvantages to making structural changes such as those reflected by the matrix organization

Using Figure 3.7 to evaluate Nokia for example, it can be clearly seen that the company has a strong project management structure; most probably a strong matrix structure. Case Study: A Day in the Life, Chapter 1 Page 19, (20 Points) This case shows a glimpse of what it is like to be a project manager. It also underscores that being a project manager is more social than technical and that project managers spend the majority of their time interacting with various people who impact a project.

Act as the central point of contact on those projects. Involve or aware of virtually every issue or decision in project. Team Leader is responsible for all aspects of the project. Work with all other positions.

Governance and organizational structure are two matters that may be considered the pillar of every large scale project. Governance is the one process that gives a suitable framework for decision making and managerial action inside an organization that should be based on transparency, accountability and defined roles. In addition, it gives a plain distinction between ownership and task control. It helps setting limits for management acts by defining goals as well as the means by which they should be fulfilled. In the absence of a proper governance structure, organizations would take risks in terms of conflicts and inconsistencies between different means of reaching goals and therefore causing costly repercussions that impact negatively on the running of the project but also on the profitability. (Muller, 2009)