Organizational Systems and Leadership Task 3 Essay examples

Insurance can be purchased through private companies or the Marketplace. The Marketplace provides “income-based premium subsidies for low and middle income people.”

In the U.K., with a Universal healthcare system in place, 92% of its citizens have no cost of healthcare because it is Publicly funded (meaning that the medical decisions are left to the patients and the doctors), where 8% of the population uses a private health care to mainly supplement the public service. “In United Kingdom, the annual cost of health care per capita is $2,317.” http://www.visualeconomics.com/healthcare-costs-around-the-world_2010-03-01/#ixzz12f6wTmBz

It is not just the poverty-stricken population that can’t afford insurance. The cost of U.S. health care and insurance is out of reach even for those who do not live in what we technically classify as “poverty”. By the 2003 Federal Poverty Guidelines, released by the U.S. Department of Health and Human services, poverty

In contrast to the United States, Great Britain has a health care system that is focused on the delivery of health care as a human right. Because of this model health insurance is universal for all citizens allowing everyone to have access to care. According to Sick Around the World produced by Jon Palfreman (2008), Great Britain runs a system that allows their people to never receive medical bills. Instead, Great Britain has implemented a national health system where the government runs and regulates the delivery of health care (Shi & Singh, 2013, p. 20). They have universal coverage where all citizens have access to health care under the national health system (Thorlby & Arora, 2016, p. 49). People living in Great Britain can also choose to pay for their own private insurance but only a small number of people select to do so.

Signed into law in 1997, Children’s Health Insurance Program (CHIP) provides health coverage to approximately eight million children. This law encompasses families whose incomes are too high to qualify for Medicaid, but cannot afford the expense of private health insurance. CHIP is like Medicaid, it’s managed by the states, but different because it’s jointly funded by the federal government and by the states. The Affordable Care Act of 2010 retains the CHIP eligibility standards and extended CHIP funding until October 1, 2015. The Affordable Care Act also provides an additional $40 million in federal funding to continue efforts to encourage enrollment in Medicaid and CHIP.

Great Britain’s National Health Service (NHS) covers everyone children, unemployed and retired. There is no payment required. Taxes are higher in Great Britain to cover the medical costs. (Palfreman & Reid, 2008)

This figure is far more than any developed country. The U.K. spends 3,935 per capita for healthcare (Fox, 2016). By comparison, these figures represent a significant difference in expenses. According to a report from the Commonwealth Fund, the U.S. healthcare system has shortcomings which have been a problem for many years (Fox, 2016). Healthcare in the U.S. is delivered almost exclusively by private sector providers. The U.S. has hospitals that are owned by for profit companies and by non-profit companies. The hospitals in the U.K. are public and private.

For Americans, health care coverage depends primarily on whether health insurance is provided by their employer or through two major public programs, Medicaid for the poor and Medicare for the elderly.

With the current healthcare system in the United States there are many people who do not have health insurance due to cost.

The United Kingdom utilizes a national health service. This service is government owned and controlled. Most practitioners are employees of the government and hospitals are government run. Taxes provide nearly 80% of the funding for their health program. The remainders of the cost are covered by employee and employer contributions. Most providers and hospitals are public, although there is a small but growing private sector. The citizens of the United Kingdom pay nothing for visits to their physician or hospital stays. They also can choose which providers they want to visit and have “good access to primary care” (Hohman, 2006). The United Kingdom ranked number 18 in overall healthcare (WHO 2000) while spending only 8.4% of its gross domestic product (Kaiser EDU). In a recent poll, 79% of UK citizens “agreed that the NHS provided them with good service” (Health Science Journal, 2009).

Britain's was the least costly and it did not cover the maximum, but it was remarkably profitable for anyone who made over $3,000 a year. It was not linked to recruitment, the patient can pick his own doctor, and it pays for surgeries, prescriptions, etc. Nonetheless, it did not exempt all out of pocket fees. Germany’s was a bit higher priced than Britain’s (almost $4,000 a year), however, it promised remarkable investment in technology and research. Although, there would be no out of pocket fees, the arrangement is funded by taxes and paid equally by workers and employers. America's health care was especially overpriced (at almost $6,500 a year), yet it covered the

In line with the majority of other developed countries, the United Kingdom (UK) has offered its citizens a universal health care system that is free at the point of service. Funded primarily by taxation, the system is popular and efficient. However, along with most other health care systems around the world, it faces a series of challenges if it is to maintain viability, in the twenty-first century. These issues include; long waiting times, an aging population, funding challenges and the increasing cost of technology.

What is Medi-Cal you may ask? Well let me inform you all you need to know about this insurance. Medi-Cal provides free and low cost health coverage for everyone from children to adults with limited financial status and resources. Medi-Cal eligibility include the following people, low income adults, families with children, children in foster care as well as former foster people up to age 26, disabled, blind, under 21 years old, pregnant, diagnosed with breast or cervical cancer, in a skilled nursing or intermediate care facility, if the child lost his parent or does not live with him or her, if the parent’s child is incapacitated, or the child’s parent who is the primary wage earner is unemployed or

beneficiaries who cannot afford prescription drugs or long term care services due to lack of

Quality is something that every health care agency strives to achieve. The Institute of Medicine (IOM) suggests that health care organizations develop a culture of safety such that an organization's care processes and workforce are focused on improving the reliability and safety of care for patients (Groves, Meisenbach, & Scott-Cawiezell, 2011). In order to address an issue related to health care quality, it is important to look at the frameworks that will analyze an organization and identify opportunities to improve performance. The purpose of this paper is to provide a description of an organization and an analysis of the following: mission, vision and values, strategic plan, goals,