Organized Crime Paper

Everyday in the United States major crimes are committed which cause risk and much destruction to the many neighborhoods and communities of America. For many years it has been a job for investigators to figure out why these crimes are being committed and where they are most likely to occur. The National Crime Victimization Survey (NCVS) and the Uniform Crime Reports (UCR) are just two of the many methods used by the government in order to keep track of criminal activities and to collect data.

The Universal Crime Report (UCR) is a nationwide program that collects data and statistical information concerning crime in the US. Some examples of these crimes include murder, robbery, aggravated assault, hate crimes and many more. The UCR is a collaborative program that reports information from all cities and towns across the country and involves different law enforcement at various levels of government. The UCR is very useful in today’s law enforcement. The UCR provides law enforcement with information that they use to help budget the money that is needed to protect our society. The UCR evaluates crime data, combines data to get an overall picture of the crimes, identify trends, and looks to see where improvement is needed.

The Uniform Crime Reporting System (UCR) is a voluntary city, university and college, county, state, tribal, and federal law enforcement program that provides a nationwide view of crime based on the submission of statistics by law enforcement agencies throughout the country (“UCR, 2013). The UCR crime statistics are used in many ways and serve many purposes. It provides resources for different audiences such as businesses, intelligence partners, law enforcement, communities, crime victims, parents , researchers and students. Individual agencies used the reports to analyze data related to their location for accuracy. The program offers advantages for the public and various agencies but if not appropriately studied it may lead to inaccurate forecasting and adverse effects. The crime statistics available varies from specific offenses within categories of violent crimes, property crimes, hate crimes, etc. Burglary is a specific property crime that will be analyzed using the UCR reports.

Y. from the years of 2002 to 2007, where populations of about 149,000 inhabitants live, and their law enforcement department has approximately 550 civilians and sworn personnel, and they report about 7,950 to the Uniform Crime Reports (UCR) system per year. The crimes that are reported: robbery, assaults, arson, burglary, homicide, rape, larceny, and auto theft. That amount of reports does not account the amount of errors they receive yearly for those crime categories. The research sampling from the Syracuse law enforcement Department reported “75,000 separate custodial arrests on 33,00 individuals, and it included only offenders who had multiple arrest during that time period, and it also show they were able to eliminate about 19,000 arrests and offenders from the sample” (Wheeler, 2012, p.

In the Uniform crime report section it covers how crime is recorded and documented nationwide so statics can be compiled and released to the public. The UCR, though very effective, does have its flaws. For instance, it is mentioned that there are times when coders made mistakes when entering crimes and one area in particular stands out. Branford Connecticut entered their NIBRS subjectively to the UCR and it was called into question when it showed a 35% increase in their burglary rate. Another issue that can occur is that some departments who experience high crime rates may not report all crimes into the UCR to make their area seem safer. One of the strangest things that can happen with this system is that departments can be enhancing their

The three sources for crime data in the United States are known as the Uniform crime report, the National incident based reporting system, and the National Crime Victimization Survey. The Uniform Crime report is a nationwide data system with data from over eighteen-thousand-two hundred and ninety jurisdictions that puts date into a rate of crime per area format. The data comes from cities, counties, states, tribal universities, college and federal law agencies. The data is compiled by law enforcement. The main problem with

In an effort to illustrate the merit of this methodology, this study examines a random sample of crimes reported to the UCR Program from 12 cities and towns in a southeastern state. An analysis is conducted to identify the under- and over-counting of offenses across various crime types. Error rates are applied to calculate point estimates with confidence intervals of the true number of crimes in each offense category. Again, the true number is not the number of crimes that had actually occurred in the jurisdiction, but the true number of each offense type that made its way into the police database. Both the sources of classification error and the most common reasons for misclassifications are

The main strength of UCR data is that it provides information on crime patterns and trends in various offense categories, as well as patterns in the overall crime in the United States. The goal of the UCR was to produce relevant, objective and accurate statistics to keep the users of the UCR well informed about crime data and to possibly assist the

Law enforcement authorities have identified varying levels of organization and sophistication among these criminal networks, ranging from professional organizations with an identifiable structure to loosely aligned criminal networks and amateur criminals who periodically assist in criminal activities. The professional groups generally have an established allegiance to a leader and follow a criminal code. Prior to passage of the Organized Crime Control Act of 1970, the investigation and prosecution of organized criminal groups had not been conducted in a coordinated manner. Congress passed RICO with the specific intent of combating the infiltration of organized crime into legitimate businesses. Providing a wide range of criminal and civil sanctions to control organized criminal activities, prosecutors employ RICO to imprison heads of crime

In this paper, I will identify the problems presented and the various relationships established by organized crime. I will also describe the legal limitations associated with combating organized crime, and include a critique of major federal laws and strategies that support this effort. Lastly, I will suggest a solution to control organized crime by discussing and evaluating the effectiveness of organized crime prosecutions.

In its most advanced form, organized crime is so thoroughly integrated into the economic, political, and social institutions of legitimate society that it may no longer be recognizable as a criminal enterprise. In the Most extreme cases, infiltration of politics by organized crime may lead to mixing among a country’s political and criminal elites to the point Where OCG are able to wield political power. Van Dijk points out that in many parts of the world, grand corruption and organized crime are two Sides of the same coin. The relationship between organized crime and Politics can be seen as a ‘system interaction’: the interaction between a Representative of a criminal sub-system, i.e. a Mafioso, and a politician from the political sub-system. Godson (2006) also points out that “When political establishment knowingly and regularly does business with gang leaders, or when professional Criminals are actually elected to power, as has happened in Sicily and Taiwan, the distinction (between the political establishments and the criminal underworld) is less straightforward.

I read the name of the DNA is Databases Help in paper the Fight Against Crime paper, the author of this Richard is Hurst. He wrote Databases from Opposing Viewpoints in Context DNA in 2012. Richard Hurst is a senior analyst at Pasco Risk Management, Johannesburg, a global risk consulting company that provides advice and services on challenges in emerging market environments. The article mentioned in this article is very little, and most of the data are population, I think these data are valid. Because the number of crime in the present society is increasing, so I do not think these big data is a lot or exaggerated.

wrong in the conclusions he arrived at and how he was careless in his research

The Uniform Crime Reporting Program consist of voluntarily combination reports from city, county and state law enforcement agencies which are reported to the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI). The FBI compiles the detailed data collections of the Uniform Crime Report (URC) data from the law enforcement agencies based on three detailed part of crime groups. The crime data are group in three categorized topics starting with the crimes that are known to the police, the number of arrests made, and the person arrested. Crimes known to the police consist of the data which the crimes are known to the police whether it was from public citizen reporting or were discovered by the law enforcement agency themselves. The collected data containing the number of arrests consist of individuals committing the crime accounting for individual that may be arrested more than once within the time frame between crimes. Then lastly, the persons arrested consisted of the actual number of person being arrested and detailed personal information are collected such as the reasons for arrest, age,

There are various crime data sources that are available to them, however the two major sources commonly used in the United States are the Uniform Crime Reports (UCR) and the (UCR) and the National Incident-Based Reporting System (NIBRS). Both of these reporting systems are popular amongst criminologist today and they play a crucial role in studying crime. Throughout this paper I will briefly describe each of these data sources and the role that they have in studying crime. I would also do a comparison on their procedures and