Origins Of The Twin Revolutions

It was much of practical pressure that arose from large-scale commerce and industrialization that later brought the modern state (Shively, 2014). The ideology was majorly moved the then intellectuals within the society.

The French and American Revolutions were significant revolutionary movements that essentially played a vital role in shaping modern nations. Both revolutions are known for successfully abolishing their former absolute monarchies to constitutional monarchies and democracies. The French Revolution was an important age of political and social turmoil in France that lasted from 1789 to 1799. Likewise, the American Revolution was also a political and social upheaval that took place from 1765 to 1783, where the colonists in the thirteen colonies rejected the British rule and were eventually able to defeat Britain’s authority hence creating the United States of America. The French and American revolutions have similar causes such as the emphasis on

The Dual Revolution was a period of political and economic revolutions that helped change the trajectory of the world. The Dual Revolution was a concept created by Eric Hobsbawm that lasted from 1750-1850. The changes that occurred during this period were a result of revolutions that led to the formation of the modern world. The new modern world helped with the way people worked, communicated, and thought. The Dual Revolution led to political and economic changes that improved the lifestyles of many people during this period and helped form a modern world.

"Modernization" has been a standout amongst the most strongly arranged ideas of the hypothetical and verifiable sociologies throughout the most recent fifty years. Originations of the term have changed significantly over the span of this talk. Beginning as an idealistic and unmistakably framework subordinate subsidiary of the Western, European and North-American thought of advance, the idea ended up noticeably mindful of the inner conflicts, control structures, and unintended results of innovation. Modernization progressively created from an effortlessly workable and appropriate – and frequently spur of the moment – idea into a general heuristic thought, which brings up the issue with regards to the ties holding present day social orders together and the

Humanist ideas, the declination of the Catholic Church, and the printing press are all events and creations that began the “Modern Era” of Europe. They come together and intertwine to lead to the “Modern Era” because they all had to do with the people, and humans themselves. Humans started to evolve in the way they thought because they broke away from the Church, they were able to learn, and they created a pathway for themselves that lead to different things. These are all reasons of how the “Modern Era” began.

Modernity is a new era in which humans began to think about themselves, and started changing from old traditions like religious influences to their own culture of radical new ideas. This era is full of rational humanistic ideas and increased the opportunities for people to go after their interests in life. Modernity is kind of like the days Americans live today with freedom to be who you think is right. People began trying to voice their opinions to higher authority, and eventually society picked up on giving what mankind deserved. For example, many people in the modern era tried to fight for their natural rights, and also some women requested for some recognition with rights like men.

During the 18th century industrialization began in Western Europe. With success comes struggle so even though Europe faced several complications along the way of becoming industrialized, it came to be the core of the world. With technology advancing along with new forms of communication being made, Europe transformed as a civilization. With this change, “Europeans gained a standard of living never before experienced by such large numbers of people”(Tarver, p. 75). With a combination of primary and secondary sources I will be writing about how this transformation of culture and society differently affects people of upper, middle and lower class.

A society 's progressively evolution has based a process of collective conditions and consensus, reversal parties which had obsolete ideologies. Besides, a society 's changing in which individually participates, then a society is prepared to innovate until a cooperative opinion is fulfilled. That a process of society growth causes two different definitions: tradition and modernity. There are numerous viewpoints and conversations between traditional and modern society. For example, in traditional society, in the words of Thompson, "the child labour was an intrinsic part of the agricultural and industrial economy before 1780, and remained so until rescued by the school" (Thompson, 1991, p. 121). However, within modern society, Conlin mentioned the argument of Karl Polanyi "the economy has a life of its own" (Conlin, 2015). The questions arise, whether the tradition is more brutal to people or community than modernity? Is modernity drifting apart from tradition as a heretic? Therefore, to compare two societies this essay will provide the main view of modern society 's traits and conducts more conform the human beings, to compare two societies, and this essay will only elaborate an opinion is more sympathetic to the modernity.

Modernisation, on the other hand, is a “conceptual framework that articulated a common set of assumptions about the nature of American society and its ability to transform a world perceived as both materially and culturally deficient” (Latham, 2000). Specifically, modernisation theorists posited a sharp distinction between traditional and modern societies. They took for granted that economic development, from traditional to modern, proceeded along a single straight, unambiguous line. Finally, modernisation advocates expected that contact with vital modern societies would accelerate progress in stagnant traditional societies.

In the process of reflexive modernization the people are getting free from the traditions. People living in the modernized so-cieties develop an increasing engagement with intimate and public aspects of heir lives, the aspects previously were regulated by tradition. These developments are building up the individualization and its operation is regulated by disintegration and reinvention. For example: going out from the traditions and disintegration of previ-ously existing social forms as fixed gender roles, inflexible class locations etc. . “The individual has to be understood as being “the author of his or her own life”. The individual increasingly lives in conditions of freedom whilst continuing being dependant for his or her identity and optimal functioning on institutions and social interaction” .

According to Taylor (1995), there are two main perspectives that can be applied to understand the rise of modernity. The first one is the difference between civilisations, and the second one is the demise of a “traditional” society and the rise of the “modern”. Taylor distinguished the former as “cultural” and the latter as “acultural”.

A society 's progressively evolution has based a process of collective conditions and consensus, reversal parties which had obsolete ideologies. Besides, a society 's changing in which individually participates, then a society is prepared to innovate until a cooperative opinion is fulfilled. That a process of society growth causes two different definitions: tradition and modernity. There are numerous viewpoints and conversations between traditional and modern society. For example, in traditional society, "the child labour was an intrinsic part of the agricultural and industrial economy before 1780, and remained so until rescued by the school." (Thompson, 1991, p. 121). However, within modern society, "the economy has a life of its own." (Conlin, 2015). The questions arise, whether the tradition is more brutal to people or community than modernity? Is modernity drifting apart from tradition as a heretic? Therefore, to compare two societies this essay will provide the main view of modern society 's traits and conducts more conform the human beings, to compare two societies, and this essay will only elaborate an opinion is more sympathetic to the modernity.

Before explaining how, it is important to first discuss what modernity is. Michael Saler describes it as:

Wehler (1975:11) explains the concept of Modernisation to be the development from traditional to modern societies. “Historically modernisation is the process of change towards those types of social, economic, and political systems that have developed in Western Europe and North America” (Eisenstadt,1966, as cited in Chandra & Sharma, 2015, p. 210). The modernisation theory sees poverty and underdevelopment as a result of a traditional society system (Greig, et al., 2007). The typical characteristics of a traditional society are its stagnancy, unchanging “status quo”, dominance of spiritual values, unprogressive and not innovative nature, and its subsistence ways of living (Isbister, 2001). This theory believes that the rich developed countries are wealthy because they practice the accurate form of contemporary beliefs and values rather than following their traditional society practices. The theory implies that if people continue

It is known that family as a social institution is a part of the whole society and they both related to each other so any change in one will cause impact and influence both of them. “modernity” According to Giddens, indicates to “modes of social life or organization which emerged in Europe from about the seventeenth century onwards and which subsequently became more or less worldwide in their influence” (Giddens, 1990:1). There are different explanation and interpretation of the processes of modernity and emergence of modern social institutions from different views and perspectives such as Durkheim (1858-1917), Marx (1818-83), and Weber (1864-1920) .who are the most influential and have laid the foundations for most modern social theories, Durkheim, for example, suggest that there were two kinds of society, the “traditional” and the “modern” (Durkheim, 1984). Weber(1971) refers to the emergence of industrialism and capitalism in Western Europe and distinguishes between traditional and modern society, particularly in terms of their contrasting patterns of values , ideas and attitudes . some theorists have seen that the emergence of modernity associated with a cluster of structural and institutional developments. Concomitantly, modernity has been seen as constructing processes and comprising distinct social, economic, and political features .In significant respects, the prevailing theories of modernization in the 1950s and 1960s, and the theoretical traditions in