Osama Bin Laden Thesis

After his first visit to Afghanistan during the first few weeks of the Soviet Invasion, he became involved in supporting the mujahdeen, a ruling party in Afghanistan at the time. After this point, he became heavily involved in fighting jihad, or holy war, and began to build up his own military training camps (Frontline: A biography). Beginning in his childhood, Osama was inundated with a strict Islamic way of life. Looking at the people who played the biggest roles in his life at this time: his authoritarian father, Islamic scholars, movement leaders, and Afghani soldiers fighting jihad, the reasons for him being who he is become more apparent. He has been fighting holy wars since he was a teenager (Frontline: Edicts), and jihad has become a way of life for him.

Usama bin Laden, born in 1957, comes from a wealthy Saudi Arabian family that owns a multinational construction business. He used his inherited wealth to finance Afghan forces fighting the Soviet Union's occupation of Afghanistan in the 1980’s. After the 1991 Gulf War, he was distressed that Saudi Arabia allowed U.S. forces to remain in the Arabian Peninsula. To advance his agenda of expelling the U.S. from the Islamic world, he worked with other anti-Western fundamentalists to organize a secretive, highly compartmentalized terrorist network, known as al-Qaida. It is through his upbringing, education, culture, and wars in Islamic countries, that Usama bin Laden has sought to purge the

Everyone knows who Osama Bin Laden is and about his horrendous lasting impact on our country and our planet, but have you ever wondered why someone would do something so awful? Osama Bin Laden became the world’s most wanted man because of his early life education, the forming of Al Qaeda, and his attacks on the United States in 2001. Bin Laden grew up in a good, very successful home, and then moved onto one of the most prestigious high schools in Jedda and was very successful. It was through an exclusive Islamic study group with a teacher where Osama learned “the principles of violent jihad” and that the Arab world should go by those rules “even if it meant supporting death and destruction” (Osama bin laden). These extreme views may have never

In his 1996 FATWA, Usama bin Laden placed personal responsibility upon each individual Muslim to unify and fight oppressive forces, particularly the United States. With this FATWA comes the distinction of the “near” and “far” enemy, an innovative philosophy utilized by bin Laden and Al Qaeda that illustrates the overarching oppressive nature of the United States to Salafi Jihadist sympathizers. Integrating this ideology into the Salafi Jihadist movement is particularly useful for terrorist organizations, as their fighters—particularly their suicide bombers—are ideologically validated for their actions, and are confident that they will receive a reward in the afterlife should they strike against the enemy.

The security risks would be very high in a situations like this one. The followers of Osama bin Laden would do any and everything necessary to get his release during the detention. Lives would be lost in the process and it would cause unnecessary attacks from that country. I think they would capture one of our soldiers, government official, or citizen and inflict torture to them just to prove a point. They would not stop at blowing something up killing as many people as possible as well.

Moreover, both authors go over the extraordinary ways politicians pull people into believe in them. Cross said ““What is assumed in this statement? Is the assumption reasonable, or does it need more proof?” (Cross 254) The author, reminded us as a society. That we need to be more skeptical about things that we see and or hear from our politicians. Likewise, in the mild of the death of Osama bin laden, countless politicians have express that it was better to keep the interrogation methods. Which brought about the information of the killing of Osama bin Laden. The choice of words that been used by politicians at that time. Was and still my favorites, the absolute ridiculousness of this particular words. The ultimate of euphemism. It’s torture,

Throughout the search for bin Laden American leaders came to the conclusion he was more symbolically important than operationally important to his followers. Because bin Laden was continually on the run, he could not be relied upon for the day-to-day operations of Al Qaeda (Baker et al.). With its leaders being the subject of a global manhunt, Al Qaeda had to adapt in order to survive. This led to the development of a decentralized governing system, with a bottom-up approach through its franchise groups. In fact, aside from Zawahiri, bin Laden’s chosen successor, very few Al Qaeda members who operated directly under bin Laden remain. In just the past four years the United States has killed four of the top five leaders in Al Qaeda: bin Laden,

September 11th, 2001 has changed and defined American foreign policy for the past two decades. Enemies of the United States are no longer only other nations, but also terrorist groups, which operate transnationally and even between continents. On the night of September 11th, in the aftermath of the deadliest terror attack the world has seen, former President George W. Bush and his War Cabinet officially declared the start of the “War on Terror”. Bush would say on September 19th, 2001,

sama bin overloaded was intuitive Osama bin Mohammed bin Awad bin loaded without a break protest rally 10, 1957, indoors Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, toward construction billionaire Mohammed Awad bin weighed down furthermore Mohammed's 10th wife, Syrian-born Alia Ghanem. Osama was the seventh of 50 kids intuitive in the direction of Muhammad bin Laden, save for the single offspring as of his father's wedding headed for Alia Ghanem.

American officials believe Osama was the reason for several terrible acts of terrorism that had the outcome of death, on that list is the 1998 bombings of the U.S. Embassies in Kenya and Tanzania and the 9/11 attacks on the Pentagon and the twin towers. He was on the FBI’s “most wanted” list for more than 10 years. Osama bin Laden was born in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia in 1957 or 1958. Young Osama had a privileged, cosseted upbringing. His siblings were educated in the West and went to work for his father’s company by then an enormous conglomerate that distributed consumer goods like Volkswagen cars and Snapple beverages across the Middle East, but Osama bin Laden stayed close to home. He married young and joined the Islamist Muslim

It is very agreeable to say that Osama Bin Laden was the CEO of all CEO when it came to managing his terrorist people (Hoffman 1999, 2). Considering his enormous success his influence among them was boundless. He could easily have been the “face” for western terror. What he was able to accomplish was quite an accomplishment, and until today the western world, specifically America, continue to be in great danger because of his success. I believe he had incomparable attributes. We all know that he fought for the preservation of all Muslim nations by defying Western influence because he believed that any Western influence is corrupting Islam, and that any American should be ousted out of the holy land. This is a Muslim duty. We also know that Muslims believe

Al-Qaeda is an Arabic term that means “the base” and arguably one of the most dangerous Islamic terrorist organisation in the world.. It was formed by Saudi millionaire Osama Bin Laden in the late 1980’s to resist the Soviet Union, which occurred from 1979 to 1989.The Al-Qaeda group is a large and very complex network which involves many countries and radical Sunni Muslim Organization. Afghanistan became ungoverned for 7 years soon after the Soviet Union withdrew during which the country experienced constant fighting among different groups just within their jurisdiction. This resulted into poverty and many children being orphaned. Most of the Orphans were educated in Islamic schools resulting to the growth of radical students and followers of what became to be known as Al-Qaeda.

There were many failures experienced by al Qaeda. Some of these failures were caused by the leadership. However, there were also some failures that the leadership could not control.

One of the world’s deadliest terrorists, Osama bin Laden, has cause havoc throughout the world by committing terror acts carried out by his Islamic extremist group, Al- Qaeda. Bin Laden has caused many problems throughout the world by his terrorism and this all came to an end on May 2, 2011. Seal Team Six was sent into his bunker and put an end to his life and his 10-year hide out after the 9/11 terror attacks on the World Trade Center. Osama has been the leader of Al-Qaeda since 1988 and since then has committed numerous amounts of terror attacks on all parts of the world. Osama bin Laden has developed over time as a leader of Al-Qaeda, and through his beliefs of Muslim brotherhood, he developed into an extreme Islamic terrorist.

The root of modern ‘Muslim Terrorism’ does not reside within the teachings of a single theorist or scholar, as the term ‘terrorism’ itself is definitionally ‘problematic’ (Jackson, 2007, 195) and subjective, resulting from a Western discourse that seeks to ascribe a definitional blanket to a broad range of diverse organisations that invoke religious justification for their politically motivated actions, of which the causes are rooted within regional context. The report in question (9/11) claims that Al-Qaeda, ‘draws upon a tradition of extreme intolerance... from at least Ibn Taymiyya’ (362), yet this does not legitimately reflect Ibn Taymiyya’s ethical and political teachings. Whilst accepting that Al-Qaeda is ‘a network of networks’ (Gregory and Wilkinson, 2005, 2) that does not denote, in any meaningful sense, to a coherent philosophy or movement, this paper will demonstrate the disjuncture between Ibn Taymiyya’s teachings and the contemporary movements that invoke his teachings in their justification. The manner in which Ibn Taymiyya’s teachings have been engaged by the concerned organisations will be first examined. Following this establishment, this paper will address the discordance between Ibn Taymiyya’s ethical teachings and the actions of contemporary jihadi groups. This paper will penultimately display how Ibn Taymiyya’s political perspective does not correspond to the view held by those such as Al Qaeda. This paper will finally implore upon the imperative for