Outliers Malcolm Gladwell Analysis

Malcolm Gladwell, the author of Outliers, a novel depicting success, provides different examples of how an individual can achieve success in every chapter of his book to show his audience that success, despite a variety of barriers, is in fact in our control. A very important chapter titled, “Marita's Bargain”, explains the flaws in today’s public school systems. He shows the problems with the solutions to fix them while showing the alternatives to the regular system such as the KIPP Program in New York. The KIPP Program (Knowledge is Power Program) is a new kind of middle school that selects students from less fortunate locations and uses unique teaching strategies to turn them around into fantastic learners. In the chapter, Gladwell is extremely descriptive by using visual words to paint the picture of the South Bronx in New York City. He describes the buildings that were built in the 1960’s as squat and bleak looking. Gladwell had an interest in this subject as it involves success, however he had no prior experiences to produce the piece. Gladwell establishes personal credibility through the use of knowledge, reason, and facts and figures. He comes across very knowledgeable on the subject presenting great data with excellent vocabulary. He is able to do this with no obvious bias as well. Gladwell shows authority because he is well known for writing novels that involve success. His intention is to teach and explain how schools need to change the length of vacation breaks

In Malcolm Gladwell's national bestseller "Outliers", Gladwell makes many intriguing assertions, one of them being "If you work hard enough and assert yourself, and use your imagination, you can shape the world to your desires." This statement is indeed authentic. When one is privileged with extraordinary talent and yet incorporates time and effort to improve it, that person is destined to succeed.

In Malcolm Gladwell's Outliers he argues that outliers, people who have achieved success almost entirely by their own means through perseverance and hard work, are not possible. Gladwell claims instead that people achieve success primarily through the opportunities they are born with or are presented with throughout their life.

Malcolm Gladwell, the author of Outliers, believes that working at something for 10,000 hours is required to achieve mastery and become a world class expert at anything. While this is a nice way of making it seem like anyone can be successful, it is simply not true. Some people will never achieve proficiency in a domain, no matter how much practice they put into it. There are a variety of factors that play into expertise besides practice and certain domains require much less practice than the magical 10,000 hour threshold that Gladwell established.

Malcolm Gladwell, in his novel entitled, “Outliers,” explores the landscape of success and shows us that success comes from the culture that surrounds the successful , not their intelligence and ambition. Gladwell explains this through a series of situations and studies. In Part One, he discusses success as a result of timing, such as the month or year you were born. In Part Two, he focuses on cultural legacies and how they play a role in helping someone become successful. He unfolds the reasons why hockey players are not born in the latter part of the year, why the Beatles and Bill Gates were able to become so successful, and why Jewish immigrants were able to become successful lawyers and doctors. Gladwell disproves many beliefs by discovering

The introduction of Malcolm Gladwell’s book, Outliers, is used to introduce the idea of an outlier. As he stated, “[an outlier is] a place that lay outside everyday experience, where normal rules did not apply. Roseto was an outlier”. People and events that are outliers are essentially the same; they lay outside everyday people or events, where normal rules don’t apply. He describes the case of a town called Roseto in Pennsylvania, an outlier in the health world. A physician named Stewart Wolf was amazed by this town, finding that “virtually no one under fifty-five had died of a heart attack or showed any signs of heart disease. For men over sixty-five, the death rate from heart disease in Roseto was roughly half that of the United States

How does one reach success? In the novel Outliers by Malcolm Gladwell, the main perspective of the novel is that success does not come from an individual simply by being lucky. In fact, success roots from our history, the environment we surround ourselves in, our values, and our cultural legacy. Every human being has the option of becoming successful despite a person’s disability, or the background a person comes from. Success is a gift. Gladwell describes what outliers mean to him, “Outliers are people who have been given opportunities and have the strength and presence of mind to seize them” (Gladwell 267). Malcolm Gladwell explained that often people are categorized into different groups of talent. Naturally, the group

In the book Outliers by Malcolm Gladwell, he uses repetitive story plots to challenge the minds of America’s today and Americas’ tomorrow. It excels the limitations of what the reader was questioning what made someone so intellectual for instants, Bill Joy or where they came from, Joe Flom. The compelling story Gladwell was telling of who are Outliers; the turning point for Gladwell was when he gave his opinion instead of someone else’s story.

Malcolm Gladwell argues that hard work and practice has more value than “innate talent” (Gladwell 1) in an excerpt from Chapter 2 “The 10,000-Hour Rule” of his novel Outliers: The Story of Success. Although he acknowledges that talent can be a factor in success, Gladwell believes that a person’s choice to work hard is what ultimately determines their achievements. To support this claim, he alludes to famous musicians and cites psychologists and other scientists to establish credibility, with the attempt to convince the audience that hard work overrules talent. His passage has a very clear and academic tone, making it easy for the audience to understand and not get confused.

In Outliers, the writer Malcolm Gladwell, makes the assertion that “if you work hard enough and assert yourself, and use your mind and imagination, you can shape the world to your desires.” I believe that this statement given by Gladwell is true. To become successful, people have to be willing to assert their selves and be committed to what it is that they desire. Also you have to be willing to “think out of the box” and be capable to use your imagination and minds together. If possible to do all of these task they will be able to become successful.

In “Outliers: The Story of Success”, Malcolm Gladwell explains some factors of success that many people overlook. He covers many topics regarding how people become successful, one I found particularly interesting was how intelligence correlates to success. According to Gladwell’s findings, “Once someone has reached an IQ of somewhere around 120, having additional IQ points doesn't seem to translate into any measurable real-world advantage.” At first, this claim seems ridiculous; how can anyone with a higher IQ not have any advantage over someone with a lower IQ?

Trying to take as much information as possible from the large amount of information available in the book. To understand the information I had to do a significant amount of background research to be able to tie it all together and make sense of it. Understanding the complexity of the human mind and why we make decisions is not an easy concept to grasp with trivial effort. Today, researchers generally agree that heredity and environment have an interactive influence on intelligence.

Francis Galton, one of the most famous explorers of human intelligence, was the first to initiate the nature versus nurture debate. Both opinions of this controversy, namely ‘nurture’ camp and ‘nature’ camp, have found overwhelming evidence in their favors. Nature camp believes that a person’s environment plays little to no role in his, her, or their mental aptitude. While nurture camp reasonably argues that a person’s environment plays a large role in his, her, or their mental aptitude.

The nature side of the debate argues that a person maintains their mental ability only based on what they are born with genetically. This would mean that the environment in which this person is bought up in plays no role in determining their mental aptitude. There are some substantial reasons for humans to be persuaded that genetics play a large part in a person’s intelligence. It is obvious that genes provide humans with their own physical equipment, which is quintessence, their very “being”. Genes and chromosomes are passed down from generation to generations.

Although some animal studies appear to suggest heredity have the greatest influence, a seemingly more accurate conclusion may be drawn form human studies on intelligence.