Outline For Euthanasia Research Paper

In the article titled, “The Wrongfulness of Euthanasia”, J. Gay-Williams concludes that euthanasia should be illegal. J. Gay-Williams definition of euthanasia is taking a hopeless person’s life. He also explains what is considered euthanasia and what is not considered euthanasia. Someone

A little over nine years ago, a man succumbed to his thirty-year battle with multiple sclerosis. At the time of his death, his body bore little resemblance to the man who had once successfully coached two little league teams and held down three jobs. In the last year of his life, James Halsey decided that the debilitating cycle of drowning in his own internal body fluids, only to return to a state of awareness, no longer served his spirits and desires. Regrettably, he was not given the opportunity of a peaceful death. Instead, James spent the last days of his life pumped full of morphine, in harrowing pain as his family stood by, rendered helpless. He was denied an inherent right and the ability to exercise his independent will. Physician-assisted

Guthrie, P. (2006). Assisted suicide debated in the united states. Canadian Medical Association Journal, 174(6), 755-6. Retrieved January 31, 2015, from http://search.proquest.com/docview/204835513?accountid=39340

It’s been 4 months since the car crash that has caused your husband to become brain dead. He is on a machine that is breathing for him and you know that he is in a great deal of pain. You keep asking for the doctors to pull the plug or give him meds to ease him into death, but euthanasia isn’t allowed where you live. Euthanasia is important because it will cause a lower amount of people who are suffering and in pain. Euthanasia should be legal in Indiana to end the suffering of terminally ill patients that are in unbearable pain and to leave the family of the person with less medical bills to pay. The first thing that needs to be done is the legalization of it.

I believe in the power of storytelling. February 2015, Valentina Maureira lays in a hospital bed. From her room, she filmed and posted a youtube video in which she said and I quote: “My name is Valentina Maureira, I am fourteen and I suffer from cystic fibrosis. I need to speak urgently with the president because I am tired of living with this disease, and she can authorize an injection that will allow me to sleep forever.” A desperate plea from a young and innocent girl that managed to move her South American nation’s - Chile - 20 million people. Cystic fibrosis is a nasty incurable genetic disease where patients have their lungs clogged and organs thickened due to mucus. Her plea for euthanasia came after another patient who had been resting in a bed beside hers, died a month ago.

Should a person have the right to die? It is a hot topic in today's society because many can't seem to find the answer to this question. Euthanasia is the kinning of an individual to relieve pain (TalkDeath). Euthanasia should be legal because many suffer from painful diseases, the cost for medicine is too high, and organ donation is in need.

Any human being should be able to make the decision if they want to live or if they want to die. Euthanasia is the painless killing of a patient suffering from an incurable and painful disease or an irreversible coma. Though it is illegal in most countries, it is legal in Oregon and Washington and should be legal everywhere. To be able to make the decision of dying the patient must be an adult, must have two oral and one written request, must be at least between 15 days between the first and last request, patient must have less than six months to live, and the prognosis must be consulted by two physicians. Both of the doctors must confirm that the patient is capable of making this decision and must also confirm that the patient does not have a

In conducting more research on Euthanasia or assisted suicide, I was able to find more arguments on why the topic is so debated about in the medical field. Some doctors and people today feel that no patient should be able to request EAS because of the emotional impacts it has on the families of the patients involved and the pressure it puts on the physicians administering it. In my opinion, it shouldn’t be about the families or the doctors, it should be about the patients who are the ones suffering and are at the stage in their lives when they want to suffer no more. The article I found called “Can physicians conceive of performing euthanasia in case of psychiatric disease, dementia or being tired of living?” I read that even though EAS is

Euthanasia is a global issue that is observed differently in many cultures and religions. In Japan, voluntary active euthanasia (VAE) is not accepted to perform in all medical cases. However, it legally practices in the limit circumstances. In a study conducted on nurses’ attitudes toward patients’ requests for euthanasia, Tanida et al (2002) found that Japanese nurses didn’t support the patients’ request to die. They also didn’t want to engage in helping physicians perform euthanasia. 53% of the nurse who had been asking by patients to terminate their death denied taking active steps in this act. Only 23% of them participated in voluntary active euthanasia as something ethically right. And 14% agreed to practice if it were legal. The underlying

Nobody thinks of their death and desires it to be extremely painful or horrible. Rational human beings desire a good, dignified end to an ideally long and fruitful life. Circumstance, like luck, may not always be in your favor. It may not even be a terminal disease, which is so frequently used in pro-euthanasia arguments. It can be as savage as a freak accident or as simple as falling down the stairs to put you in a world of excruciating pain. While this is never to be wished on anyone, for those that have had the misfortune of being diagnosed with a terminal or painfully debilitating disease must have a choice out of it. Do we, who so desire a good death, have the right to judge others’ state when we know nothing of it? Do we have the right

Unless a person has a terminally ill family member or a friend, that person will most likely not understand the complex debate surrounding euthanasia. The recent high profile case of a newlywed woman diagnosed with a brain tumor who moved to Oregon to ensure her right to die put euthanasia in the spotlight in the United States. Understanding the traditional methods doctors used to communicate about terminal illness, the ethical issues faced by participating health care providers, and the legal issues surrounding euthanasia, and the reasons why people consider assisted suicide can enable individuals to make better informed decisions about their own wishes.

Many people today have very different opinions on Euthanasia. Some individuals may think that it is a form of murder while others see it as a way to cause a painless death of a person to in order to end or prevent suffering from a terminal illness (Burkhardt & Nathaniel, 2014). The purpose of this paper is to define active and passive euthanasia. Within this paper it will define the two types of euthanasia which are active and passive. This paper will also define the various levels of government and how a bill will

Have you ever wondered what you would do if you were diagnosed with a terminal illness.

The ethical issue is Euthanasia, there are many groups that support or oppose this issue. Euthanasia is the painless killing of a patient suffering from an incurable and painful disease or in an irreversible coma. The different viewpoints are based around whether it is humane to assist someone in dying and whether it should be illegal for someone to assist the death of someone who has a terminal illness and are suffering incurable pain. Groups that oppose the issue generally believe that it is inhumane to end someone 's life early, these groups generally believe these people should be given care and as much comfort as possible until their last days. Groups that support the issue generally believe that if someone has lost their mental state or are suffering unbearable pain that cannot be cured, that they should be allowed the option of euthanasia because it is inhumane to make someone suffer unbearable pain if they do not need to. An ethical issue brings systems of morality and principles into conflict, ethical issues are more subjective and opinionated and generally cannot be solved with facts, laws and truth. Euthanasia is an ethical issue because there are two equally unacceptable options. It is considered wrong

A state's categorical ban on physician assistance to suicide -- as applied to competent, terminally ill patients who wish to avoid unendurable pain and hasten inevitable death -- substantially interferes with this protected liberty interest and cannot be sustained." - ACLU [3]