Outsourcing: Problems and Solutions

Tegan failed to impart proper knowledge of its A/P system to Hrad due to lack of sufficient personnel and expertise in that area, as per the case, only one employee was there (Julia Jones) who was having the functional knowledge of the current system and was solely responsible to interact and review the low level designs (LLDs), which resulted in the backlog of reviews and thus Hrad was not able to iterate as required.

While outsourcing may be beneficial to some of the companies partaking in it, the general consensus is that it ultimately proves to be harmful to the American workforce. The act of outsourcing and shifting many company call centers and technical support teams, or “low skill service jobs,” to foreign countries reduces jobs for those that could truly benefit from them within our own country. The unemployment rate has dramatically increased, and continues to rise, compared to what it has been in years past; yet there are numerous companies which still insist on handing over these “low skill service jobs” to people in other countries such as India. The most obvious and logical reason for outsourcing is reducing costs; people are working for

“Outsourcing refers to the practice of contracting workers outside of a company or business for work duties or services previously performed by company employees or “in-house”. This practice is also often referred to as offshoring due to the increasingly prevalent use of “non-U.S.” service providers for these outsourced duties. However, strictly speaking, outsourcing can and does refer to the use of contracted labor provided by individuals outside of an organization, but still within the U.S.; whereas when these same services are provided outside the U.S., it is both outsourcing and offshoring.”

You may have been asked if your job is next with the recent outbreak of shipping American jobs overseas. Lately, all of the corporate talk is about outsourcing and how it’s helping American companies grow, but what is not talked about is how it’s going to effect the American economy in the next few years and what should be done to stop it. Outsourcing is a modern plague that is killing the American dream. Its long-term effect is catastrophically damaging to the American economy and Americans need to step up their educational expectations, skill sets and motivation if they are to keep that long-fought for dream alive.

“It is the maxim of every prudent master of a family, never to attempt to make at home what it will cost him more to make than to buy” (Taylor). This quote by Adam Smith, cited by Timothy Taylor, defines outsourcing as a task that can be done within a group, but is instead done by a third-party group for less money. While outsourcing service benefits American firms, studies show it takes jobs from middle-class Americans and adversely affects the American economy; however, other research proposes that outsourcing might actually benefit the American economy.

Outsourcing is the transferring of manufacturing or other tasks, such as data processing, to countries where labor and supplies are less expensive. Outsourcing impacts the U.S. economy by becoming a controversial practice in the United States because many jobs have moved overseas where those tasks can be accomplished for lower cost and rates.Trade between countries and needing goods influenced exporting, the sale of goods and services through foreign markets, is an example and relation to outsourcing. Importing being the branch of it all letting countries purchase the good and services from foreign sources, in all resulting into a balance of trade. This whole matter affects the U.S. economy giving countries methods and product information on

the general population who lose their occupations should now locate another activity they may not be also fit the bill for as their old employment. these individuals will likewise have more budgetary issues for quite a while which will back off their spending on non-important things. this will hurt the economy in America and additionally bring down the personal satisfaction for Americans.

American companies trust in foreign labor to produce goods, but they are neglecting the American public with jobs, and properly made goods. With cheap labor American CEO’s can save money and make a better profit. Dr. Ron and Anil Hira explain the upcoming danger American jobs will face in the future “nearly one in nine of all U.S. jobs-are vulnerable to being outsourced” (Ron Hira Ph.D and Dr. Anil Hira 2). Business owners can make an impact on this problem by creating more work for U.S. citizens. Outsourcing will put more money in the pockets of wealthy CEO’s and in turn will create an even larger imbalance between the classes. The problem can be weakened once government regulations limit the amount of jobs that are outsourced, but also

The outsourcing of non-core business and services has risen in recent years. The top benefactor of this rise has been India. Corporations have found a profusion of well-trained, English-speaking workers to cram into call centers and customer service jobs. This is even happening in high-skill positions like hospital X-rays technicians also. India is seen as the pioneer in outsourcing jobs

Outsourcing is a severely underestimated threat to the United States’ economy, which may eventually lead to our next financial crisis. Damages from outsourcing span throughout all levels of the US economy, although the effects of outsourcing are especially devastating to those of the lower class. The threats presented by outsourcing are acknowledged by both of the major presidential candidates: Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump. In order to prevent the next financial crisis, we must take immediate action.

In analyzing the second reason listed for why outsourcing is used; ‘inability to attract the highest caliber of employees to job functions that may be peripheral to the organization’s core discipline’, companies employ a different kind of outsourcing tactic. This reason leads to offshore outsourcing solutions. If a company cannot attract high caliber domestic employees to job functions secondary to their main function then they seek help where labor may be less expensive and more efficient.

Should we buy or should we do it ourselves? That is a basic question that a lot of companies face when planning their strategy for their processes of production. There are arguments for and against using both strategies, although to provide services for another company that could have been done within the company itself, is widely common among companies nowadays. This strategy is called outsourcing. What defines outsourcing is that a firm allows someone else to have complete control over their production, it shall therefore not be confused with other business relations where the one party still has control, or tells the other party how to perform the work (Andersson, V. Grigoriadou, E. Quist, C. Ruhdin, C. 2002). A typical example of outsourcing

The concept of outsourcing originate from the American terminology “outside resourcing”, meaning to get resources from the outside.1

Offshoring is the practice of relocating business processes to lower cost locations outside the country of origin. This is not a new practice for companies in the United States. Moving business processes to another country to take advantages of lower operating costs and cheap labor seems like a great idea. However, the dilemma for a company is whether the benefits of offshoring outweigh the risks. This dissertation will begin by briefly reviewing the history of offshoring. Next, it will examine the various advantages and disadvantages associated with offshoring. Thirdly, it will explore the growing trends of backshoring and nearshoring in situations where

For most managers and executives alike, one of the key problems facing any organization in the 21st century is the ability to effectively manage and motivate personnel to establish ways that technology can improve but not emasculate the worker, and to provide a positive, optimistic, and forward thinking work environment. In combination with this management challenge is the very nature of globalism the ability to extend markets to other countries using the appropriate model that will ensure a win-win situation with the host country and corporate liaison (Going Beyond, 2002). The entire philosophy of work, jobs, labor, and career vary in each culture, even within divergent countries, and most assuredly by the chronological age of the individual. Within the United States, and to a lesser extent, most of the First World, the idea of "work" and a "job" are tied to a person's internal view of themselves and their contribution to their own personal growth, as well as the idea of career growth. Career is much more than an economic term, far more than earning money, and ties more to psychological factors than simply "making a living." In other countries, the idea of human resources and labor are often at odds within a particular culture or socio-economic unit. For example, manual labor, or repetitive labor that requires only basic skills (e.g. assembling circuit boards or sewing) is usually viewed as only a means to an end, whereas some countries also have a burgeoning class of