Ownership And Character Analysis

Ownership is the act and state of having something in control or possession. Aristotle claims that owning tangible objects help to build moral character, while Jean-Paul Sartre proposes that ownership extends beyond to include intangible things such as skill or knowledge. Different objects can have varying effects on the development of self identity, leading us to who we grow as a person. A sense of self can be a reflection to what we own, whether it is a tangible or not. Ownership of intangible and tangible objects play a vital role for the growth of self identity, as it teaches crucial morals in life to develop personal character.

Anywhere in the world, someone acquires something, whether it be money, a car, or even an idea. We can “own” many intangible and tangible items in life, but how does ownership relate to a sense and development of self? This question has been constantly answered for centuries through intelligent people like Plato, Aristotle, and Jean-Paul Sartre. However, the question has received no agreeable answer. In the end, people will agree that there is a strong and positive relationship between ownership and a sense of self because the things you own will define and develop who you are positively by exhibiting what you like, what you can and cannot do, and in the end, characterizes you, as long as you use the things you own properly.

Jimmy knows too well the agonies of abandonment. First, when his mother, Cecilia, ran away with Richard to pursue a better lifestyle. Then, due to his father’s, Damacio Baca, alcoholisms and violent behavior; he also had to leave Jimmy behind. In spite of the drawbacks from abandonment to being a maximum security prisoner in Arizona State Prison, Jimmy preserver’s the darkness of prison by overcoming his illiteracy. However Cecilia and Damacio is not as fortunate as their child; Cecilia is shot by Richard after confronting him for a divorce and Damacio chokes to death after he is released from the detox center(Baca 263). Therefore the most significant event in this section of the memoir, A Place to Stand by Jimmy Santiago Baca is the death of Jimmy’s parents.

The relationship between our identities and possessions remains on going. In fact, Joan Kron elaborates on that matter in her essay The Semiotics of Home Décor and mentions how we barely know what is actually beyond our home décor and possessions (74). Kron argues that our possessions and home décor grants us with various aims that cater to our human needs “Our possessions give us a sense of security and stability. They make us feel in control…we use things to compete.” (75). Also, Kron talks about status and how its vitality is depicted through our possessions. Something as simple as the price tag, the originality and rareness of the object and its competence can say something about our status. With this in mind, Kron asserts that “Some objects

The ability to have ownership over something, tangible or not, can give a person a sense of value or superiority when comparing themselves to others. Furthermore, as humans, it is easy to desire things as one’s own and claim it, but the way something is treated differs from person to person. As a result, the material items and skills a person has ownership over provides a glimpse of his or her’s true nature.

When the topic of owning something comes up, the conversation can go two ways: one may argue that ownership is owning an object, many other people, such as Jean-Paul Sartre believe that you can own something by becoming an expert in a certain skill and knowing something thoroughly.It's possible to own an idea or a skill, such as my idea about ownership, and to own a tangible object, such as a book. The verb " to own" doesn't just mean to physically have something, it also means to know something, or to make something a part of ourselves.

The practice of owning other people as “property” has affected the world profoundly. Specifically in America, While the idea was not new, it lead to ways for people to justify the process of slavery. The initial excuse was that the peoples in Africa where not Christian, so it was supposedly “ok” for them to be enslaved. Then many of these newly captured peoples became Christian. Faced with no other excuse, the lawmakers had to think of a way to mask their own greed. So they made it a racial thing. They thought up a lie, so simple, that everyone actually believed it. They took up the so-called “white mans burden” to make the “inferior” people submit. Unfortunately this asinine excuse was actually thought of as fact, and people lost track of

Anywhere in the world, someone acquires something, whether it be money, a car, or even an idea. We can “own” many intangible and tangible items in life, but how does ownership relate to a sense of self? This question has been constantly answered for centuries through intelligent people like Plato, Aristotle, and Jean-Paul Sartre. However, the question has received no agreeable answer. In the end, people will agree that there is a strong and positive relationship between ownership and a sense of self because the things you own will define and develop who you are positively by exhibiting what you like, what you can and cannot do, and in the end, characterizes you, as long as you use the items you own properly.

Socially speaking, the concept of property is related to the possession of tangible and intangible things by an individual or a particular group. This idea of property brings benefits for some people: it gives the feeling

Essentially, humans have the right to own property if they invest their own manual labor in producing it from raw materials. It is important that this right is upheld because it preserves the autonomy people have toward themselves and their property. Even if interfering in this right could produce a more desirable outcome for others, it would be morally wrong because rights are good in themselves, not what they achieve. Therefore, justice in holdings cannot consider welfare, happiness, or equity. It is simply a basic freedom that is inherently valuable and fundamental to uphold a just society.

Ownership exists between the tangible and the intangible; while owning objects often devolve into unhappiness and heighten a dangerous materialistic outlook, ownership of the intangible promotes and builds a concrete, upright moral character. The pursuit of tangible ownership inevitably leads to a precarious path of dissatisfaction and misery. While the attainment of material goods may have benefits, it quickly devolves into a twisted desire that spurs the growth of emotions such as greed; this appears mainly when the ownership of tangible items defines a person’s status and gives people a sense of worthiness. At this point, people define themselves with their possessions of the number of flashy cars and extravagant mansions they own rather than relying on their own personality.

What does it mean to own something? An individual may own something that has more significance to the item than meets the eye. This subject has encouraged prominent thinkers to learn more about the idea. This has entered a very fascinating way of thinking that has even perplexed the astounding minds of Plato, Aristotle, and Jean-Paul Sartre. This is why owning something has more significance than may be thought, tangible goods are detrimental to a person's character, ownership of tangible goods helps to develop moral character, and ownership extends beyond objects to include intangible things as well.

Plato argues that owning objects is detrimental to a person's character. There are many different views as to how objects affect ones character. I do agree with Plato's point of view on this topic, by saying that with the things that a person owns, is how that certain person defines them self. I can say with my own experience that I have had objects in my life that almost have more control over my life than I do myself. A few of these things include; my car, my phone, and my basketball jersey.

All the three philosophers, whose work I am going to scrutinize on, have very specific, yet in most cases common views on property. First of all, let me define what the term property means. Property, as I see it, is an object of legal rights that is possessed by an individual or a group of individuals who are directly responsible for this it.

An individual who becomes enthralled with the property will eventually want power, becoming vulnerable to a greedy and self-indulgent persona taking over.