Oxidation Titration

with a solid oxidant that is composed of KMnO4 and CuSO4. 1.0mL of diphenylmethanol was placed into

1. We measured 2 mL of diluted hydrogen peroxide (the substrate), 1 mL of guaiacol (the product indicator), and 1 mL of neutral buffer (pH 7) with a syringe and disposed it into tubes 1, 2 , 4, 9, 11, and 12.

The lab leaders and the Punk Rock Warlord prepared three different concentrations of catechol oxidase by extracting potato juice (because it contains lots of catechol oxidase). Pure catechol, a 5mL test tube, 1mL/5mL

For the concentration experiment three different concentrations were made of the KMnO4. Three test tubes were filled with 4 ml of water. The first test tube had 1 ml of the 500 KmnO4 added to it. Then the second test tube had 1 ml from test tube one and 4 mL of water. For test tube 3, 1ml was taken from test tube two. Each concentration was placed into a dialysis tubing using the strings to tie off one end and the clamp to close off the other end. Before the dialysis tubing was placed in the beaker, 1ml of a sample was placed in a cuvette to blank the spectrophometer. Each stir plate was set on a low speed and the dialysis was hung in the water by a string. Every 5 minutes that passed a sample of 1 ml was taken and put into a cuvette. The cuvettes were placed in the spectrophometer to measure the absorbance of each solution. The measuremnts were then recorded in lab notebook. Once the measurements were documented, the average of absorbance and concentration was recorded.

1. Gathered all required materials to designated lab bench. 2. Considered all safety precautions including the prevention of spilling water to avoid falls, handling glassware carefully to prevent shattering, avoiding long periods of working with warm water to avoid burns and avoiding the digestion/inhalation of by-products produced after the reaction (e.g. ethanol and carbon dioxide gas). 3.

Please complete the entire experiment as instructed in the lab manual except for any modifications noted below. Fill out the

23. Measure the pH with a pH strip and record the data of the new solution in Table 3.

4.Measure 35mL of warm water and add them into each of the 4 test tubes at about roughly the same time. It is essential that the water is warm. Do not seal the test tube.

The pipette was used to transfer 8 mL of the 0.5 molarity solution into the graduated cylinder. Distilled water was added to raise the bottom of the meniscus to the 20.0 mL line and the solution was transferred into the beaker after it was rinsed with the solution. The pipette was used to take a small quantity of the solution and rinse and then fill a test tube with the solution. The amount of 0.2 molarity solution needed to create 20.0 mL of 0.1 molarity solution was calculated as 10.0 mL. The pipette was used to transfer 10.0 mL of 0.2 molarity solution into the graduated cylinder and distilled water added until the bottom of the meniscus reached the 20.0 mL line. The solution was transferred to the rinsed beaker and then a portion placed into a test tube that had been rinsed with the solution. The amount of 0.1 molarity solution required to create 20.0 mL of 0.05 molarity solution was calculated to be 10.0 mL. The pipette was used to transfer 10.0 mL of 0.2 molarity solution into the graduated cylinder and distilled water added until the bottom of the meniscus reached the 20.0 mL line. The solution was then placed into a beaker that had been rinsed with the solution and then into a rinsed test

The potentiostat was set up by the instructor with acetate buffer. The sample was deaerated with nitrogen gas for 5 to 8 minutes in order to remove oxygen. Oxidation and

By using acid-base titration, we determined the suitability of phenolphthalein and methyl red as acid base indicators. We found that the equivalence point of the titration of hydrochloric acid with sodium hydroxide was not within the ph range of phenolphthalein's color range. The titration of acetic acid with sodium hydroxide resulted in an equivalence point out of the range of methyl red. And the titration of ammonia with hydrochloric acid had an equivalence point that was also out of the range of phenolphthalein.. The methyl red indicator and the phenolphthalein indicator were unsuitable because their pH ranges for their color changes did not cover the equivalence points of the trials in which they were used. However, the

The purpose of the experiment is to oxidize a secondary alcohol (2-octanol) by using sodium hypochlorite (bleach) to produce 2-octanone. The starting material consisted of a sample of 2-octanol that was placed into a three-neck flask along with acetic acid and acetone creating an acidic solution. While monitoring temperature fluctuations to ensure a temperature of 400 Celsius was not reached, sodium hypochlorite slowly dripped from a separatory funnel into the acidic solution. Once this reaction reached its entirety, the solution was combined with sodium bisulfate to remove any of the remaining oxidizing agent. This solution was then tested and brought to a neutral pH using a sodium hydroxide solution. The reaction material was extracted using ether and was then washed with a saturated sodium chloride solution. The organic solution was then dried using magnesium sulfate and was then decanted and placed onto the rotovap. The produced weighed .599g and based on the infrared spectrum analysis (see Figure 1) preformed on the product it was determined to be 86.1% 2-octanol, which means .516g of 2-octanol was obtained in the final product.

For this experiment, titrations on a weak acid, acetic acid, and a buffer were performed. Acetic acid was titrated with NaOH in order to observe the half-equivalence point as well as the equivalence point. Then, the buffer and the buffered acetic acid solution prepared faced additional titration with NaOH and HCl to evaluate the differing buffering effects following the addition of a strong acid and strong base. Finally, the buffer’s buffering capacity was calculated. If the experiment were to be repeated, it would be interesting to observe the buffering effects following a titration between a weak base and a buffer instead with greater concentrations. The change in the concentration following the preparation of buffer with a weak base and its conjugate acid would pose for an interesting experiment to observe an increase in the buffering capacity.

The purpose of this experiment was to determine how much KMnO4 was needed to titrate approximately 1 mL of an Unknow X101 concentrated solution of Oxalic Acid. A standardized KMnO4 solution was used on a known solution of Oxalic acid to help determine the unknown percent oxalic acid in unknown X101. The unknown sample for this experiment was sample x101 which theoretically was a % Oxalic Acid dehydrate sample but, the average of all three trials determined it to be a 6.7% percent Oxalic acid.

An acid-base titration is the determination of the concentration of an acid or base by exactly neutralizing the acid/base with an acid or base of known concentration. This allows for quantitative analysis of the concentration of an unknown acid