P&G Japan the Sk-Ii Globalization Project

Faced with major losses from operations, Sharp Corporation’s president, Mikio Katayama, questioned the whether it was necessary to reform the current business operating model. Sharp’s current operating model contained several flaws.  It placed sensitive, high-value-added operations such as research, development, and component manufacturing near its headquarters in Japan. Faced with threats such as intense industry competition, currency risks, very high transportation and utility costs, and extremely high infrastructure costs and high corporate tax rates, Sharp Corporation needs resources in the forms of new methods, technology, and approaches to doing business in the modern world. It is recommended that the company

This looks at the possibility of how SK-II cosmectics product can be a booming brand in Japan for P&G company to grow their market share and have a profitable outcome to cover up for their loss in the last few years.

Regions’ is a member of Forbes and Fortune 500 (Morgan, 1/23/04, para. 17). Regions revenues also declined 8.44% from 2002 to 2003. Their net income increase 5.15% between 2003 and 2004. Regions three year compounded annual growth for net income was .09% and .04% for five years (Thompson, 12/2003-5/2004). Regions also does not have a good track record of integrating their mergers (Goldberg, Jason, 1/26/2004, para. 20). Profit growth for Regions lagged behind the industry average in 2003 (1/24/2004, para. 1).

1a) In a short time, the young Chinese cosmetic market has become quite saturated with numerous firms. In order for Yue Sai to position its brand effectively, it has to draw upon unique strengths that others do not have. Madam Yue-Sai created Yue Sai with the aim “to create, produce and sell the very best beauty and skincare products that we can offer to Asian women and to the world…” The company started under her belief that the Chinese women had different standards for beauty and required specifically tailored cosmetic products. If Yue Sai under Cotyhad continued to build its brand under this positioning instead of focusing on distribution, the brand would be a far more prominent player in

The Daniel Gill, the chairman and CEO faces the possibility of changing the organizational structure of Europe, Asia/Pacific, and the Western Hemisphere. The current organization includes an International Division which oversees production and marketing for countries outside the United States. The goal of changing the organizational structure of these three regions is to increase sales growth internationally and decentralize responsibility away from headquarters to field operations.

While many of the world’s economic powers seem similar, there is no doubt there are some very key differences. Many of these differences can be attributed to cultural differences within each of the countries. While many of these countries work together in global business efforts, cultural differences would certainly have a significant impact on management style, leadership and even work ethic of the employees. The United States and Japan are both strong economic powers that hold to a capitalistic economic system. Their management styles, however, are very different. This can often be explained through the differences in culture and management or leadership styles. Over the years, the two

The main issue of the P&G Korea case is centered around the question of market share. P&G and Unilever are the two major market shareholders in the Korean detergent industry holding 80-85% of the total market share. The remaining 15-20% of the market is held by low-priced local Korean brands. There are no new markets either company can tap for further market share since most Korean households already use laundry detergent, making the market saturated. Other than peripheral chemical changes claimed to be “improvements”, there are no major innovations to be explored for product development or diversification. Per Ansoff’s strategic opportunities matrix, P&G and Unilever are both focused on Market Penetration,

The Procter & Gamble has vast differentiated products due to its innovation culture. This is not just the invention of new products and services, but the ability to systematically convert ideas into new offerings that alter the very context of the business (Charan, 2008). The product differentiation allows the P&G to charge premium price for its products and assists to capture market share from its rivals by increasing the product demand.

The cosmetics business is a billion dollar industry. Every year, women are responsible for consuming millions of cosmetic products. The cosmetics industry is so large because of several factors. The media is a huge contributor to the intense pressure to look a certain way. The idea that "sex sells" is evident in gossip magazines, movies, advertisements, music, and more subtly- in the business world. People first notice what race someone is, how beautiful or ugly they are and what clothes they are wearing. Beauty is skin deep; however, first impressions are usually what others use to base their

P&G need to work hard and do more research and development in order to produce higher quality, more innovative, and more unique in products in order to answer consumer’s need and compete with those major world brand competitors.

I. Problem The Shiseido company is weak in understanding the market needs and is looking to create a strategy that will both increase global market share and reap success in the high potential Chinese market.

• We recommand P&G to directly invest in this market by focusing only on Marketing and Distribution to roll out SK-II (a special product) in a foreign market. It should not be an advantage for P&G to acquire subsidiaries, or to license or to franchise because resources and capabilities of SK-II are located in Japan. It would be difficult to find same raw materiels to produce SK-II in another country. Exporting SK-II in a foreign market will be better, for that they should emphasize on: • Differentiation advantage, • Changing customer behavior, • Product positionning, • Pricing policy, • Advertisement, • Counseler team…

In the highly competitive Japanese skin-care market, P&G¡¦s new SK-II product has proven its success as a premium and prestige offering. P&G has gained significant knowledge transfers from SK-II development and further, has successfully tapped the fickle Japanese market and has devloped a loyal user-base in Taiwan and Hong Kong. With its phenomenal success, it is only logical that P&G consider rolling-out the SK-II product-line to the international market. However, while there is significant worldwide growth potential within the $9 billion prestige skin-care industry, based on recent organizational changes, new corporate priorities, and thorough market assessment, P&G must base its decision on current resources and capabilities to

As a large global company, P&G has strengths that have helped them to acquire such a vast market share. The company’s culture, strong product quality, the ability to understand customers, brand equity, and centralized management is at the

With direct-connect structure, the business leaders or functional managers of specific business divisions report to their headquarters in the U.S.. After the direct-connect structure is implemented, it has changed the operation in GE Canada. In the past, the Canadian CEO was fully responsible for the profitability of the Canadian operating division, with the manufacturing plants made a full line of products primarily for the Canadian market with some exporting possibilities. After the new management system implemented, the U.S. divisional bosses is responsible for the profitability of each operational business division both in the U.S. and Canada. With the change in management system, the business development group has changed its position in GE Canada by switching the role of conducting feasibility studies and new market development for the business unit in Canada to the role of looking for opportunities to leverage the strengths of Canadian activities on a global basis. The business development group felt that the change in management system has made the U.S.-based business leaders to ignore the potential business opportunity in Canada and added more uncertainty to the business development group role. Most decisions need approval from the U.S. divisional bosses, whom do not have a complete picture of the business potential in Canada and want full control of the business operations