• P King alleges strip search and false arrest. P Dean, as the owner of the car, alleges that MOS searched her car without her permission. P King claims he was operating his mother’s, P Vivolyn Dean, car with his friend, Martel Saladin, who was seated inside the front passenger seat. P claims that he was stopped by defendant MOS Tepperman, who was in plainclothes. P claims that MOS Tepperman ordered P and Mr. Saladin out of the car without identifying himself as an officer. P states that MOS Tepperman and another MOS dragged P and Mr. Saladin out of the car then threw them against the car. P claims that MOS ordered P and Mr. Saladin to remove their sneakers and socks. MOS Tepperman and another MOS searched P King’s car without get Ps permission. …show more content…
P Kings claims he was integorrated by MOS Tepperman who questioned him about drugs being in the car. P alleges that he informed MOS Tepperman that there was no drugs in the car. P claims he was strip searched and made to squat. P claims that he was further integorrated by Impersonation Unit. MOS state that they were from Queens Narcotics and were conducting a buy and bust operation. MOS Rosario caused traffic backlog when he arrested a female (non-party). MOS Tepperman, Owen, and Hoosack arrived at the location and MOS Tepperman and Hoosack were directing traffic. MOS Tepperman was directing cars to turn around at the intersection when he observed P King’s car with the windows rolled down. MOS Tepperman approached P King’s car to ask him to turn around and smell marijuana emanating from the car. MOS Tepperman, Owen, Hoosack asked P King and Saladin to exit the car and took them to back of the vehicle. MOS Tepperman, Owen, and Hoosack searched the car. MOS Tepperman recovered an imitation NYPD shield from inside the car near the gear shift, mace, numerous PBA cards, and police light packet. MOS did not search the hood, trunk or glove compartment.
I notified dispatch that Officer Albert and I were out at the RSC. I parked our patrol car on the north side of the RSC and entered the north door. I heard Officer Smith on the radio say he was out with the subject near the Credit Union. I observed from across the RSC Officer J. Smith and Officer R. Faison standing next to a black male all the way by the Book Store. As I walked closer, I could see the black male with both of his hands up in the air and he was getting down on both of his knees. When I got to the Credit Union, I saw a set of crutches and a black bag laying on the floor. I told Officer Albert to stay here with these items as I continued to go behind the black male. Officer Faison kept trying to talk to the subject but he was clearly ignoring him. The subject who was later identified as
P alleges false arrest for criminal possession of a weapon. P alleges that she was visiting her boyfriend’s apartment when MOS forcibly entered the apartment and searched the apartment. P alleges that P informed MOS that she does not resided at the apartment however she was arrested. Defendant MOS Mayer stated that while on regular patrol he observed Khalid Edwards, whom MOS Mayer had previously arrested at the location, exiting the building. The landlord of the building that previously informed MOS Mayer that he was going to evict Mr. Edwards. MOS Mayer approached and questioned Mr. Edwards. Mr. Edwards informed MOS Mayer had he was not living in the building however he was staying there. MOS Mayer went to the apartment to verify Mr. Edwards’s
Defendant MOS Horne and Jarvis were seated in a parked car and observed Ramarley Graham and 2 unapprehended males (non-parties). MOS Horne stated that he observed Ramarley Graham holding his waistband area and Ramarley Graham and the 2 males entered a bodega and looked around and quickly exited it. MOS Horne and Jarvis followed them in their car and put their description over the radio and stated one possibly armed. MOS Horne observed them attempting to gain entry to into various buildings. The 2 males were able to gain entrance into 728 East 229th Street, and waved to Ramarley Graham over. Then, 2 uniformed officers passed the location. Ramarley Graham exited the building and passed by MOS car when MOS Jarvis observed the butt of a gun in Ramarley Grahams’s waistband area. MOS Horne radio over
P alleges assault and false arrest. P claims he was a guest at a party when MOS arrived and recovered a firearm on the ground. P claims that he was not in possession of a firearm. P alleges that he was falsely arrested for criminal possession of weapon, sprayed with mace, and assaulted by MOS. Defendant MOS states that they were responding to a radio run for shots fired and a vehicle fleeing the scene. While canvassing the area, MOS observed a party in a yard which had very loud music playing and people were drinking in the street. Sgt. Arquer entered the party through the main entrance to shut down the party, and MOS Mayer entered through the side gate. As Sgt. Arquer was speaking to an individual, MOS Mayer observed P walking in his direction
P alleges false arrest for criminal possession of a weapon. P alleges that he and his two friends were helping his father in law move. P alleges that he was placing bags into a van when MOS approached and questioned him. P alleges that he informed MOS that he was helping his father in law move out. P alleges that MOS searched him and the bags without consent and recovered an antique long bladed knife and P was arrested. MOS stated that MOS Grieco, who was inside an unmarked vehicle with defendants MOS Mayer and Winters, observed P and two other males walking on sidewalk carrying what appeared to be electronic equipment. MOS Grieco approached P and began to question P. MOS Grieco stated that P did state that he was moving. MOS Grieco observed
P alleges that he is a drug dealer. P alleges that from March 2010 through January 2011 defendant MOS Tepperman extorted money from him. P claims that when he refused to pay, MOS Tepperman had P arrested. P claims that MOS Tepperman was earsdropping on his cellphone conservation and tracking his whereabouts through GPS. P claims he paid MOS Tepperman money to keep the police away from him. P states that he did sell MOS Tepperman a brick of cocaine in September 2010.
This case is consolidated with Victoria Goetz vs. NYC (2013-052590) Ps are brother and sister and allege false arrest. P David Diaz alleges that MOS entered his bedroom and knocked him to the ground then was cuffed and placed with his face down on the bed. P Quintesha Diaz alleges that she was getting ready for school when MOS entered. P Quintesha Diaz alleges that a female MOS patted her down in the bathroom then she was tightly handcuffed, causing cuts to her wrists and swelling. P Quintesha Diaz alleges that as a result of the incident she missed 2 two days of school and her AP English exam (which caused an opportunity to have the exam credit accepted by Hunter College). Defendant MOS Sisco states he was executing a search warrant and narcotics
P alleges temporary loss of his dog and false arrest. P alleges he was holding his dog on a leash on the street when MOS grabbed and threw him to the ground causing P to let go of the leash. P alleges that the dog lunged towards defendant MOS and MOS shot at the dog. P alleges that he was cuffed and taken to the precinct and defendant MOS took his dog to an animal dog as a lost dog. P alleges that he had to pay $280 to retrieve his dog back. P alleges that MOS did not allow his tied his dog up. P alleges that the criminal charges were, later, dismissed. No other information is known about the case. It is unclear what role, if any, Defendant MOS Jeffrey Sisco, played in this
Facts: Defendant Wardlow was seen holding a “opague bag”by Officer Nolan. Officer Nolan was driving with fours car, his being the last one. The cars were in a “heavy narcotics trafficking area” examining the area for “drug transactions.” Wardlow saw the police cars and fled the area, even though Wardlow was not doing anything “suspicious.” Officer Nolan seeing the defendant flee, chased and caught the defenfent. When caught officer Nolan did a “protective pat down search for weapons.” Officer Nolan looked at the bag, opened it and found a gun. Wardlow was then arrested by Officer Nolan. Wardlow’s attorney filed a “motion to suppress” the gun, under the action of an “lawful stop and frisk.” The motion was denied by The Illinois Trial Court.
P alleges assault and false arrest. P alleges that he was seated in the front passenger along with his friend Dennis Gambino (non-party) in Mr. Gambino’s car which was parked on the street. P alleges that MOS pulled up next them in an unmarked police car and instructed Gambino to open the doors. P alleges that MOS pulled P and Gambino out of the car and arrested him. P claims that another unmarked NYPD vehicle drove up to the location. P alleges defendant MOS Truscelli pushed against the car then MOS Panizzi, Truscelli, Velez, Smimov, Banghart, Litrell, and Delprete punched and kicked P causing to lose consciousness. P states that he was transported to Richmond Univ. Medical Center where he was diagnosed with a broken nose and other injuries.
P alleges false arrest. P alleges that a manager of a storage facility recovered two firearms for inside the storage unit under her husband’s name, Sabin Jimenez and provided NYPD with Sabin Jimenez’s address. P alleges that MOS defendant David Grieco and 4 other MOS arrived at her home, which was also Sabin Jimenez, home and entered and search searched her home. P alleges that MOS did not recover any firearm from her home however P was arrested. P alleges she remained in custody for approximately over 24 hours and her arrest was voided or the DA’s office declined to prosecute. No other information is known about the case. It is unclear what role, if any, Defendant PO Mayer played in this
P alleges assault and false arrest. P, a political activist associated with Cop Watch Patrol, was approached by MOS Butrint, Kreckmann and a female officer on public roadway. P alleges that MOS shine a flashlight in his face and P began to record MOS and requested their names and badge numbers. P alleges that one of the MOS demanded P’s identification and when P refused then MOS grabbed P and slammed him against the fence. P alleges that MOS Kreckmann and Butrint grabbed P’s arm and P’s shoulder popped. P alleges that he was transported to the 46th precinct and defendant MOS Lynch was present at the precinct. P alleges that he was strip searched at the precinct and placed in holding cell. P alleges that he was released from custody with two
P alleges excessive force and false arrest. P alleges it was West Indian Day Parade weekend and large group of individuals were on the streets. P alleges there was individual who was speaking against police brutality. P alleges she was walking away from him when MOS threw her against the wall and handcuffed her. P alleges the MOS denied her medical attention and transported her to the precinct. P alleges that she was taken to the hospital from the precinct. MOS Raymond Weng states that MOS were directing the gather which had gather to disperse. There was a male who refused to leave the location. When MOS went to arrest him and he resisted, then P began pushing MOS away from the male. MOS Weng states that P attempt to strike his supervising
Plaintiff claims false arrest and malicious prosecution. Plaintiff states he was arrested for criminal possession of marijuana however no marijuana was recovered. PO Hernandez, PO Bonet, and PO Heredia were members of the anti-crime in PSA 6. Officers observed via Viper camera plaintiff and two other apprehended individuals smoking marijuana in the park behind a housing project. Officers approached plaintiff and two individuals and conducted a stop and frisk. Officers did not recover any contraband or marijuana was recovered. Plaintiff and the two individuals were transported to the precinct where a bag of marijuana was recovered during a search at the precinct. Officers could not determine ownership of the marijuana therefore all three were
Procedure: D was arrested on an outstanding bench warrant, brought a 1983 class statute. D states that invasive searches were conducted before he entered the jail which violated his 4th A rights. TC granted summary judgment, Appeals reversed, US SC held that strip searches were not reas.