PATCO Analysis

The Pullman strike brought to glaring attention the “labor problems” in America and the “labor question” in American politics; the labor problems being the unrest and discontentment of the workers, and the labor problem being the role of the government in business. One of the consequences of the Pullman Strike is that labor reformers began to vigorously search for a way of protecting the interests of the workers in an unfettered capitalist economy. Another consequence is that American workers realized that when they were in bad situations, they would never have the opportunity for improvement unless they orchestrated the government through an overwhelming turnout at different elections. “If workers used the Socialist Party and democratic elections, the power of their numbers would ensure the election of political leaders sympathetic to their cause”.2

The shift in organized labor in the United States (U.S.) from the private sector to the public sector has been a dramatic one. Union growth in the American public sector is part of a 60-year trend fueled by the decline of labor power in the private sector (Norcross, 2011). In 2009, union membership in the public sector passed that in the private sector for the first time in U.S. history

The Arizona towns of Clifton and Morenci, Arizona have a rich history with conflict and conflict transformation. The conflict between the Phelps Dodge Corporation (PDC) and United Steelworkers (USW) took place from 1983 to 1985 and had drastic implications on United States labor relations. This conflict analysis will focus on the conflict’s background, its evolution, and the parties and their issues. In addition, a reflection on important conflict resolution principles will be provided.

As seen in the Pullman Strike, Ludlow Massacre, etc, the federal government took the side of the employers and sent in federal troops to break up strikes. This all changed in 1902 when Roosevelt took the side of the United Mine Workers in the Anthracite Coal Strike. Wilson knew that something had to be done since the coal supplies for winter were being threatened, and so he proposed both the operators and miners to accept an arbitration. The operators rejected but willingly gave in when Roosevelt threatened to seize the mines. This awarded the workers with a wage increase and lower working hours. Although the union didn’t achieve to earn the recognition they wanted, they were pleased with the government siding with them. He didn't stop there,

This strike proved to open many doors for the postal workers and their families as well as giving others courage to so what they believe in. In doing what they did they made the future for every postal worker so much better than it could have ever been by forming the America Postal Workers Union and achieving the Postal Reorganization Act. The effectiveness of their tactic may not have immediately been high, but within the next year or less it proved to be a great movement that they made

This research paper will inspect one of the most important events in the late twentieth century within the United States labor history. It has transformed the labor relations development to altitudes. President Ronald Reagan, in 1981 dismissed of approximately eleven thousand employees of the Professional Air Traffic Controller Organization (PATCO). It stood out as an event of unmatched worth during the labor decline era. The PATCO strike was among the expensive in the United States. Although, the PATCO strike was not the largest in history for America, it was substantial enough to involve eleven thousand air traffic controllers employed by the Federal Aviation Administration

Summary: Although I am an Englishman, I have taken a genuine interest in the labor policies of the US. I have served as president of the AFL (American Federation of Labor) which was comprised of different craft unions. Through peaceful protest, my goal has always been to achieve lower hours and higher wages. This has instigated collective bargaining and that, as well as written contracts, will be the way that employers make financial agreements with their employees. I have inspired the AFL to support World War I by avoiding strikes, raising wages and keeping up the morale of laborers.

Describes advancements identified with the strike by federal postal representatives in the United States of 1970. Utilization of strike dangers and right-to-strike by union representatives amid 1969 authoritative maneuverings; Response of government authorities to the strike; Unions required in the exit; Strikers' dismissal of beginning assertion between union pioneers and government authorities; Provisions of the understanding which finished the

Within the last few days, nearly 125,000 workers on 29 different railroads have walked off of the job as a refusal to handle any train with Pullman cars on it. Business owners have been reaching the peak of their irritation and have been employing replacement workers to try to end the protest. The courts have also become involved. With the recent passing of an injunction, federal troops were sent to the scene. Instead of helping the situation, it enraged the strikers. Protests have been beginning to become violent.

In conclusion, the brief history of more than one hundred years of the modern trade union movement can only touch the high spot of practices and recognize the principal trends of a century of achievement in the United States. In such history’s condensation, episodes of significant and of high human drama should also be of significance discussion far too briefly, or in some instances relegated to a mere mention. However, the issue that is clearly evident is that the working individuals of America have experienced unionization in struggle for achieving the benefits that they have accumulated during this century. Improvements did not emerge in an easy way. In addition to this opinion, the National Labor Relations Act guarantees the employees right to organize and bargain collectively with their employers, and get involved in other protected concerted

Two years after the infamous Triangle fire, 20,000 workers in Lawrence, Massachusetts; angered over wage cuts and deplorable conditions went on strike, prompting the twin reactions of police brutality and press coverage (Hodson & Sullivan, 2008). “As a result of the strike, not only were wages raised and conditions improved in the textile industry as a whole, but important legislation was also enacted that restricted the exploitation of child and female labor” (Hodson & Sullivan, 2008, p. 132). It is doubtful that working conditions would have evolved to the level of equity we find today, without the sacrifice and activism of unions and their members.

External advocacy and political involvement is deeply engrained in the culture of labor unions. Bill Fletcher Jr. writes myth 8: “the union uses our money for political action and I have no say in the matter,” in his novel “They’re Bankrupting Us” And 20 Other Myths about Unions. In this myth, Bill Fletcher Jr. addresses unions and how they take political action. Labor unions often take political action in a controversial way, while not always getting full advantage of their work.

This all started with Volker’s “shock.” In 1979, the chairman of the U.S. Federal Reserve Paul Volcker announced the end of the Great Boom and claimed in 1979 that American standard of living would decline. By increasing interest rate, the government successfully drove down the inflation rate, but it also caused unemployment rate to soar. It is counterintuitive to think that when unemployment rate rises, the solution is to repress the protest or the strike. Yet under Reagan’s neoliberal policies, the strike did not trigger any introspections of its economic decisions but the oppression. The crushing of union was considered justified, as Volcker stated “the most important single action of the administration in helping the anti-inflation fight was defeating the air traffic controllers’ strikes” as a response to a national strike of air traffic controllers. Beside breaking unions as part of the neoliberal idea which presumes that the fall of economy is related to workers who “had become too complacent, too ready to expect that life would just keep on getting better,” the government continued to exploit labors with strategic techniques such as “flexible” employment arrangements that could pay less to workers and reduce the benefits since these people

What I have learned from reading all this material, is that a lot of effort was put into play to ensure union and management learn now to be able to ensure the workplace and the workers are treated fairly and safely. In reading it seems to me that in wanting change in your work environment within the FAA does not differ that much from private sector union requests. I think that the aviation industry is off now at a stalemate, Once the government intervened it set a precedence of how aviation will look in the future. Now that the airline's profits are at an all-time low there is a competition in the airline industry to stay strong and alive. Labor unions need to improve greatly, going back to where their roots are and knowing why they were needed in the first place.

Traditional relationships between management and labor looks nothing as it did 100 years ago, especially when it pertains to unions. Being the only industrialized country with its infrastructure mostly intact after World War II, the United States basked in economic superiority with American industry. However, management in the past rarely included employees in the decision-making process. There was a disconnect between management and labor which union leaders were utilized to close gaps and ensure fairness in areas such as pay and benefits, but more importantly, where safety is involved.