PETA Animal Testing

There are about 17 to 70 million animals used each year for experiments in the US laboratories. These animals are taken from breeding services or kidnapped from their owners. Agencies in the US such as the National Institutes of Health and Department of Defense fund many of these experiments. Today, there are other options other than putting animals through suffering. Even though the animal welfare act is in place, animal experimentation goes against animal rights because animal testing is unreliable, cruel, unnecessary, and weak testing for science.

I had the privilege of interviewing Tracy Ziegelhofer, who for fifteen years has been a manager for Envigo, an international private company that works to advance pharmaceutical development, modern therapies, and test the toxicity and safety of substances through animal testing. She reassured me that the stereotype animal testing has been given could not be more false. Animals who are used for testing are specifically bred for this purpose; they are not taken out of their natural habitats (APSPhysiology). Additionally, of the 26 million animals tested each year (ProCon Team), mice and rats account for more than ninety percent, where large animals such as pigs, dogs, and primates make up the remainder (Ziegelhofer). After successfully testing cardiovascular devices for humans on a beagle, Ms. Ziegelhofer adopted the dog, informing me that many animals are “retired” after testing and are put up for adoption. Animals who exhibit pain are humanely euthanized following an experiment (Woods). She also described the quality of life for laboratory animals. “All the animals are very socialized,” she said, “They have plenty of toys to enjoy playing with, and of course they have beds for relaxing, and they always have food available to them,” she continued (Ziegelhofer). Regarding what laboratories can and cannot do, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration have

While testing the heart valves, scientists gained valuable knowledge concerning the rejection of transplanted valves, which could be extended to organ transplant procedures overall. The discoveries made and knowledge gained eventually led to the development of methods to suppress the immune system, allowing patients and doctors to avoid the complications of organ rejection. Unfortunately, suppressing the immune system of transplant patients may also permit infection to be introduced. The future transplants may lie in creating valves and from the tissue of the patient in need of a transplant, which could feasibly circumvent any complications from rejection without the suppression of the immune system.

Many lives of animals are being used for the sake of testing, these species do not belong in laboratories, locked in a small cage or on a table with needles stuck into them. Animal testing is a phrase referred to a group of founders preforming on alive animals for many purposes of studies to find potency of new medical profits. According to Ian Murnaghsan, (2016). All performers, even the ones that are restricted as delicate, have the ability to cause the animal feel agenizing pain and suffering. Because of the amount of pain they put the animals under, they are most likely to end up getting killed or die from the unbearable abuse. There is a different amount of animals that get used for animal testing, but mostly mice, monkeys, and pigs. Shockingly,

As stated above, animal testing is an incredibly cruel practice. Scientists who use animals in experiments are free to do almost anything to animals in the name of science, because there are so few laws regulating how scientists are allowed to treat animals. According to People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA), “Even animals who are covered by the law can be burned, shocked, poisoned, isolated, starved, forcibly restrained, addicted to drugs, and brain-damaged…” These animals lead terrible lives full of torture and loneliness, all for very little progress in any field.

. "No such Thing as Humane Animal Experimentation." The Ecologist, vol. 35, no. 1, 2005., pp.

As many of us know MAC is one of the most popular makeup brands used today. For so many years MAC has been a cruelty free company but that did not last long. MAC started testing on animals and everyone including celebrity Pamela Anderson was upset. Animal cruelty really effects the animals being tested. These animals can die during the experiment do to the chemicals they use. It performs test that are not necessary reason being, the makeup sometimes does not even launch. Also, it cost a lot of money just to have these animals in the laboratory. With this being said, they should not use animals for experiments to harm them or think that it is okay to let them go on with their lives after the harm.

It was proven by the Humane Society of the U.S that healthy and diseased tissues isolated from human volunteers can provide a more relevant way of studying human biology and disease that animal testing. Crude skin allergy tests in guinea pigs only predict human reactions 72% of the rime. A combination of chemisty and a cell based alternative have been shown to predict human reactions 90% of the time. Artificial skin is another great way to test products which produce more useful results than testing. Computer modeling can replace testing by making accurate estimates on a substance likelihood of being dangerous. Human patient simulators are also being used in research worldwide. These are life-like computerized human simulators that can talk, bleed, move around, and even “die”. Not to mention, there are millions of cell-based alternatives that are at our hands to use on testing instead of torturing billions of innocent animals. Replacing animal testing will improve the quality as well as the humanesness of our science! Using other options would make some products more effective and less hazardous, and best of all put all the animals out of their

Every year, millions of animals are killed by the cosmetic companies to test their products. These companies use powerful drugs and lotions upon innocent animals to record the fatal side effects only to repeat the experiment over and over again regardless of the creatures’ pain and suffering. They also give various reasons to justify the cosmetic animal testing. The cosmetic companies claim that they test on animals to establish the safety of their products and ingredients for consumers. These companies also feel that they are safeguarding the environment. However, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) states that the companies do not require animal testing for cosmetics and alternative testing methods are available. In

Right this second, millions of animals are in cold empty cages waiting to be put out of their pain and misery. Around the country, animal testing trials are going on right now, as we speak. Many do not consider that those animals that are tested on are not taken care of properly, when animals are in pain and scared, they give off negative results, but most importantly, people and animals are different, which creates inaccurate results. PETA is an organization to help protect animals against cruelty. On their website it states, “The only U.S. law that governs the use of animals in laboratories—the Animal Welfare Act—allows animals to be burned, shocked, poisoned, isolated, starved, forcibly restrained, addicted to drugs, and brain-damaged” (“Animal testing is bad”, n.d., para. 21). We do not protect our animals as well as we should, but on top of that, these animals

Albert Einstein once said, “Our task must be to free ourselves by widening our circle of compassion to embrace all living creatures and the whole of nature and its beauty." Animal testing is an extremely controversial topic, where most of the confusion is caused by a lack of knowledge on the topic. Many agree that animals should not be used for scientific or commercial testing.

The PETA website includes the many conditions that are enforced upon animals that are kept in captivity for years to be cruelly tested on. In this article it shows the conditions they have to live in the laboratories and how they have to wait in misery. Even though this is a bias source and this organization is considered extremist, it gives many effective and reliable alternatives. For example, many organizations listed on the PETA website promote the use of humans in testing clamming that it will provide many jobs to people with a lower-income.

According to an article, an estimate of 100 million animals are killed in the U.S. for scientific and commercial testing each year. Animals such as mice, rats, frogs, dogs, rabbits, hamsters, monkeys, birds, guinea pigs, and fish are being used. These animals are being treated in a very fiendish and inhumane way. For example, they are subjected to force feeding, forced inhalation, food and water deprivation, physical restraint, the infliction of burns and other wounds to test out the healing process and many other things. Most animals are used for testing cosmetic ingredients; they do skin

First and Foremost, throughout the process of animal testing, animals are either hurt or killed. Because scientists are trying to find a solution and new information, they are willing to do whatever it takes. That includes hurting innocent animals. Paula Moore, a recognized author for PETA, stated that ‘’It is morally wrong to poison, infect, burn and

Companies claim that they do this to benefit us humans, to make it safe for us. In doing this animals are being harmed. When a cosmetic product is being tested, they used rabbits primarily. The process they use is to rub chemicals onto freshly shaven skin or rubbed on their eyes. There is other ways products could be tested. Companies can use chemicals that are already known to be safe.