POA Letter

Victim’s Summary: Linda said she filed for PO-17-421 on Wenesday, November 29th, 2017 against James. Linda said James had drove by her home loacted at 35156 West 21st Street in Mannford on Wenesday, Novemeber 29th, 2017. Linda said the road to her home is on a dead end street and James did not have a reason to be by the home. Linda was trying to file a violation of protective order report over the phone on Thursdat, November 30th, 2017. Linda said she recieved a missed call from James on Thursday, November 30th, 2017. Linda said she had James served on Wenesday, Novemeber 29th, 2017 by the Sapulpa Police when James was in Sapulpa.

The case of Elizabeth Bouvia v. Superior Court is a well-known case in the patient’s right to refuse treatment. Elizabeth Bouvia was born with cerebral palsy, which worsened, as she grew older and subsequently caused her to become a quadriplegic. She additionally developed severe degenerative arthritis that caused her to be in continuous unbearable pain. At the age of twenty-eight her condition had worsened to the point that she was said to be bed ridden and completely dependent on others for her activities of daily living. Although she had many physical challenges she was a

I am the attorney for Brenda C. Vidinha and Janine P. Vidinha who are seeking guardianship over Eleanor Wilson, who you examined on September 26, 2017 (see attached). Lisa R. Arin, attorney for Ms. Wilson, is requesting a more detailed report of your examination that supports your diagnosis. Your updated report will be submitted to the Court in lieu of your live testimony at the hearing, which is scheduled for January 8, 2018. A one page report should suffice. Previously, Dr. Laurel M. Coleman submitted one page reports that were satisfactory.

PNC refused to notarize the surrender form; however, the new withdrawal form submitted on March 28 is notarized. The Notary, Anita Williams, previously notarized distribution forms for the client in 2011 and 2012.

The problem that came with Terri’s case is that she did not have an advance directive or desired wishes documented in the situation she was unable to make medical choices for herself. Her husband wanted

This patient showed up at DETOX on her own (Voluntary Admission). Her mother has faxed over a one page form of what appears to be a pick up order for an Ex Parte. Mother is calling wanting someone to talk to her attorney that completed the paper work and mother also works at this law office. I have alone with Dori requested more information (the attachment). This paperwork appears with a signature that states Circuit Court Judge but you can’t read the name and the name is not typed like it normally appears under the signature line. I don’t see the normal petition (that’s completed by the family)for involuntary assessment and stabilization or assessment only form, also missing Report Of Magistrate which outlines the proceeding –consent to the

History is taken from the patient, who is a good historian along with records from her inpatient stay at Portsmouth Regional Hospital and her outpatient visit for Dr. Tan. In short, she is a 64-year-old right-handed white female who on August 8, 2015 awoke with acute weakness on the right side of her body. She had difficulty getting out of bed. She was able to move around and walk, but she had noted coordination problems. She called family who was concerned about her slurred speech. After they arrived, they recommended that she go to the emergency room. The patient did not notice any visual field cut. She did not notice any language problems other than slurred speech. There was no dizziness. No significant sensory changes. She has no history of palpitations. Her risk factors are all poorly controlled diabetes, hypertension, hypercholesterolemia, and cigarette smoking. She was not on an aspirin a day at the time of her event. She presented to the emergency room, where she noted significant improvement. She was discharged with minimal findings on the right side for outpatient physical therapy. She has one more physical therapy visit on Thursday. Currently, she states that she has no problems with ambulation. As far as the stroke is concerned, because her hip pain will affect her before any fatiguing, she thinks she has only a 10 to 15% deficit as far as overall right-sided strength. She is able to do her ADLs. She is having

R/s Ester Anderson had a stroke and is not able to make good decision. R/s reportedly Ms. Anderson is living a mobile home that has no water and electricity. R/s Ms. Anderson recently left Magnolias Assisted Living to move in with an unknown man and reportedly they are drinking heavily. R/s Ms. Anderson doesn’t have a primary caregiver and is not able to take care of herself. R/s Ms. Anderson is on a lot of medication and she does not have and she won’t take it.

Marcia Nash, our chief legal council, will be your principal contact during these negotiations. Please telephone her at 555-7376 to sit a mutually beneficial time for us too meet early next month. We are eager to settle this matter soon.

In many people’s opinion, Nancy Cruzan was dead long before she “died.” Like many medical issues, declaring someone as dead comes with ethical, moral, political, and emotional factors, leading family members to question decisions or argue with themselves or others. One major aspect of this conflict is the fact that the patient is not able to make this decision for themselves at the point when it is necessary. Many people now write living wills expressing their wishes for their treatment in the case that this decision is needed. When a living will is not present, however, families and doctors, and, in the case of Nancy Cruzan, politics, have to decide.

A.B.is currently not receiving medical care for any health problems and is in no acute distress. She was a full-term (41

Although the patient is weak and debilitated, she is cognitively intact and is able to problem solve and make decision for herself. She

Hi Lap Pong, below is an email I crafted and sent it to the authority officer. In order to let you understand the situation I will give you some information. We have 2 items we need to submit to the officer. However, we submitted 1 item only and the officer approve our submission in a short time. We faced certain issue as we still have 1 item pending.

This afternoon she’ll provide an update. Jo and her manager are willing to meet and discuss further if need. She’s has provided the ‘Combining document’ for further information which I assume you already have a copy.

Subsequent to our meeting on yesterday, I have started to work on the new additions to the CAO. However, based on my last CAO for Voluntary Self-Disclosure, a response letter was written by the Director’s Office informing the Respondent of our decision in regard to its request. I talked with Brandi and looked in associated files and was unable to locate said letter. I have also attached a copy of the letter written by Ryan Benefield (Interim Director at the time) notifying the Respondent that the Self-Disclosure issues will be handled via a CAO. Currently, we are adding this to the most recent CAO but this will cause that CAO to remain open for an undermined amount of time because compliance issues surrounding