On 8/6/2015 POS mailed a letter to the PO’s address of record stating the following: 5/12/2015 CHBR was reversed, we’re pending clarification on the two sets of POA documents and who is authorized to sign on the PO’s behalf, and we need a letter of instruction confirming the POA information.
On 8/28/2015 POS spoke with POA (Eva Jo Sparks) and advised:
- There are 2 separate POA documents (Eva Jo Sparks and Tracy Reagan),
- we still need a POA affidavit for Tracy Reagan,
- CHBR has been denied as POA’s cannot change beneficiaries on the accounts as the documents do not specifically state the AIF is authorized to change beneficiaries for the PO,
- for any other requests, both POA’s must act together since there is nothing in either document
…show more content…
On 9/18/2015 a copy of a revocation of POA letter (signed by PO and notarized) was received. POA authorization notes were removed from the policy.
On 10/08/2015 a letter of instruction was received from Eva Jo Sparks stating the following:
- Ruth E Weatherall had a stroke and is unable to sign nor can she rationally make decisions.
- Both Eva Jo Sparks and Tracy Reagan are POA’s, but Ms. Sparks attends to the needs of Ruth E Weatherall because she lives closer.
- The 4/30/2007 CHBR was not executed by Ruth E Weatherall and is fraudulent. Eva Jo stated the individual that committed the fraud is under a court ordered protective order, awaiting further prosecution by the Oklahoma County DA’s
…show more content…
Sherry Doyle filed for a guardianship hearing and it is scheduled for 11/25/2015.
On 11/9/2015 received voicemail from other attorney Jake Aldridge, stating he doesn’t represent Ruth but just prepared and filed the revocation of POA, and that he has called adult protective services in Oklahoma and Cleveland County based on his concern of Ruth’s financial management.
On 11/10/2015 Sherry Doyle submitted physician’s statement for Ruth. The statement refers to the stroke in February. Both POA’s and revocation were executed after the stroke. Physician statement makes note that Ruth is not capable of making financial decisions on her own. On 11/12/2015 Legal determines the POAs were signed after the stroke, so they will not be honored, and will wait for guardianship proceedings.
On 11/16/2015 Eva Jo called in requesting account value information for guardianship hearing, states she intends to liquidate 100% of the account once guardianship is in place, no information was provided to
PNC refused to notarize the surrender form; however, the new withdrawal form submitted on March 28 is notarized. The Notary, Anita Williams, previously notarized distribution forms for the client in 2011 and 2012.
I am the attorney for Brenda C. Vidinha and Janine P. Vidinha who are seeking guardianship over Eleanor Wilson, who you examined on September 26, 2017 (see attached). Lisa R. Arin, attorney for Ms. Wilson, is requesting a more detailed report of your examination that supports your diagnosis. Your updated report will be submitted to the Court in lieu of your live testimony at the hearing, which is scheduled for January 8, 2018. A one page report should suffice. Previously, Dr. Laurel M. Coleman submitted one page reports that were satisfactory.
The problem that came with Terri’s case is that she did not have an advance directive or desired wishes documented in the situation she was unable to make medical choices for herself. Her husband wanted
The case of Elizabeth Bouvia v. Superior Court is a well-known case in the patient’s right to refuse treatment. Elizabeth Bouvia was born with cerebral palsy, which worsened, as she grew older and subsequently caused her to become a quadriplegic. She additionally developed severe degenerative arthritis that caused her to be in continuous unbearable pain. At the age of twenty-eight her condition had worsened to the point that she was said to be bed ridden and completely dependent on others for her activities of daily living. Although she had many physical challenges she was a
Victim’s Summary: Linda said she filed for PO-17-421 on Wenesday, November 29th, 2017 against James. Linda said James had drove by her home loacted at 35156 West 21st Street in Mannford on Wenesday, Novemeber 29th, 2017. Linda said the road to her home is on a dead end street and James did not have a reason to be by the home. Linda was trying to file a violation of protective order report over the phone on Thursdat, November 30th, 2017. Linda said she recieved a missed call from James on Thursday, November 30th, 2017. Linda said she had James served on Wenesday, Novemeber 29th, 2017 by the Sapulpa Police when James was in Sapulpa.
This patient showed up at DETOX on her own (Voluntary Admission). Her mother has faxed over a one page form of what appears to be a pick up order for an Ex Parte. Mother is calling wanting someone to talk to her attorney that completed the paper work and mother also works at this law office. I have alone with Dori requested more information (the attachment). This paperwork appears with a signature that states Circuit Court Judge but you can’t read the name and the name is not typed like it normally appears under the signature line. I don’t see the normal petition (that’s completed by the family)for involuntary assessment and stabilization or assessment only form, also missing Report Of Magistrate which outlines the proceeding –consent to the
R/s Ester Anderson had a stroke and is not able to make good decision. R/s reportedly Ms. Anderson is living a mobile home that has no water and electricity. R/s Ms. Anderson recently left Magnolias Assisted Living to move in with an unknown man and reportedly they are drinking heavily. R/s Ms. Anderson doesn’t have a primary caregiver and is not able to take care of herself. R/s Ms. Anderson is on a lot of medication and she does not have and she won’t take it.
Although the patient is weak and debilitated, she is cognitively intact and is able to problem solve and make decision for herself. She
Ronald X is a self-sufficient man who values his liberty. After he broke his leg, everything changed. The free and autonomous life that he was enjoying was now going to change. His medical comorbidity of artheriosclerosis causes him to be confused at times. The doctor and his children did not want him to be discharged home until they found an appropriate nursing home. Ronald X is aware of his problems and
Hi Lap Pong, below is an email I crafted and sent it to the authority officer. In order to let you understand the situation I will give you some information. We have 2 items we need to submit to the officer. However, we submitted 1 item only and the officer approve our submission in a short time. We faced certain issue as we still have 1 item pending.
In many people’s opinion, Nancy Cruzan was dead long before she “died.” Like many medical issues, declaring someone as dead comes with ethical, moral, political, and emotional factors, leading family members to question decisions or argue with themselves or others. One major aspect of this conflict is the fact that the patient is not able to make this decision for themselves at the point when it is necessary. Many people now write living wills expressing their wishes for their treatment in the case that this decision is needed. When a living will is not present, however, families and doctors, and, in the case of Nancy Cruzan, politics, have to decide.
Marcia Nash, our chief legal council, will be your principal contact during these negotiations. Please telephone her at 555-7376 to sit a mutually beneficial time for us too meet early next month. We are eager to settle this matter soon.
This afternoon she’ll provide an update. Jo and her manager are willing to meet and discuss further if need. She’s has provided the ‘Combining document’ for further information which I assume you already have a copy.
A.B.is currently not receiving medical care for any health problems and is in no acute distress. She was a full-term (41
Subsequent to our meeting on yesterday, I have started to work on the new additions to the CAO. However, based on my last CAO for Voluntary Self-Disclosure, a response letter was written by the Director’s Office informing the Respondent of our decision in regard to its request. I talked with Brandi and looked in associated files and was unable to locate said letter. I have also attached a copy of the letter written by Ryan Benefield (Interim Director at the time) notifying the Respondent that the Self-Disclosure issues will be handled via a CAO. Currently, we are adding this to the most recent CAO but this will cause that CAO to remain open for an undermined amount of time because compliance issues surrounding