POS 543: A Comparative Analysis

It is depicted that modern organizations tend to incorporate the aspects of the open systems with those of the natural and rational perspectives. Examples include the institutional, transaction cost, and the contingency and the contingency theories. Organizations adopt the open system that accommodates the other two theoretical perspectives for it to exist (Davis & Scott, 2006). These organizations tend to have structures that are based on the processes, the products, and the function.

There is evidence for specific relationship between communication, trust, and organisational openness. Managers develop trust among employees to meet organisational goals. Top management of an organisation always depends on their supervisors for an effective communication between management and employees. While workers depend on top management to set the strategy and determine methods for organisational achievement, managers must be trusted to show workers the association between workers' tasks and the organisational objectives and to give more particular and high standard information required to perform their jobs well (Thomas, Zolin, & Hartman, 2009). Openness is a key element of communication to predict one’s level of involvement in a work. Therefore, if an employee sees the organisation is a free place to express himself, he is more likely to be involved in the organisational goals and this could foster a better work environment. (Thomas, Zolin, & Hartman, 2009).

There was room for improvement for both the open system and complex adaptive system in this organization.

Formal structure is the way that the organization is operated by those with responsibility for managing the organization. They create formal structures to ensure that the standard operating procedures are followed and the duties are streamed down by a hierarchical approach. I work in a formal structure (government job) where we follow the chain of command and use titles as a way of acknowledging the roles. Informal structure is the intertwining social structure that governs how people work together and the elements are important because people’s

An open system as Harrison and Shirom (1999) explains is product by which a whole entity operates based on individually functioning parts simultaneously in order to achieve the system’s goals. According to Katz and Kahn (1971), there are essentially nine working components of an open system. These nine characteristics are typically common to various types of open systems and can be thusly applicable to my current organization as follows.

Daft, Richard L. Organizational Theory and Design: 12th edition. South-Western College Publisher. 24 April 2015

Open refers to delivering “better results together than on our own”. (orion values page) At Orion I am encouraged to be curious, ask questions, listen and grow. Everyone within the organisation who I speak to value each other’s ideas, supporting one another and openly shares their knowledge in regards to work tasks and everyday life. Working in an organisation with such strong core values and open environment

Throughout this paper we will address how the functional system works to explain behavior through emphasis on "cooperation, exchange, and adaptation" rather than adherence to formal rules and regulations. (Freely, 9) Furthermore we will discuss the complexities of organizations, organizational goals and conflicts and monolithic versus fragmentary systems, and environmental impacts on organizations. First we will examine organizational complexities.

Philosophers have identified three key perspectives to organization: rational, natural, and open systems. Each of these perspectives include key development for organizational design. They each also exemplify developments of the science of organization. Modern organizational theory can be described as a combination of these three main perspectives (Scott, 2003). This presentation will compare the rational and natural approach with suggestions of restricting to the natural perspective for our current organization.

An open system approach is that which views an organization as an integration of different parts

It is important that managers, administrators and students of management study organisations, because they have a very powerful influence on our daily lives (Lewis B Dzimbiri, 2015),further according to Etzion (1964) in (Lewis B Dzimbiri, 2015) mentioned that “we are born in organisations, we play in organisations, we grow in organisations and we shall die in organisations”. Therefore human beings should have a hunger to study organization, to know how they are structured, operate and what impact do they have on our lives. This essay will discuss positive and negative impacts of the organization on human life. Furthermore, it will assess the relevance of management theories such as classical, behavior and open systems in understanding of formal

22. Organizations that obtain resource inputs from the environment and transform them into outputs that are returned to the environment in the form of finished goods or services are viewed as open systems.

Critically discuss the key ideas of both the Systems Rationalism Era and the Organisational Culture Era. Examine how these ideas were shaped by earlier strands of management and reflect on their enduring impact on Contemporary Management ideas.

The pure growth of the theory of open systems is none other than the practice of the theory of institutions to organizations. Therefore, in Open Systems Theory, the obligations of the operational environment place the organization as a production system that no longer operates according to an instrumental logic. In the field of institutional theory, the organizational environment is now seen as a social phenomenon both institutional and operational .

This discussion will first look at the organization as an organism. Then, discuss the implications of open systems and the importance of the environment. Finally, evaluate the strengths and limitations of the organismic metaphor.