Pace of Life

2. Summarize at least four key points made by the authors. In the case of

References are properly cited within the paper; reference page includes all citations; proper title page and introduction are present and evidence of spell check and grammar check are not obvious. Seven to 10 errors noted.

Critically evaluate the weaknesses/limitations/problems of the article. Is the work thorough? Fair? Clear? Convincing?

2b) The authors provided the reader a lot of information on the topic. Each topic was very well explored. A lot of different information on different but similar studies. The authors seemed very knowledgeable on the topic. This article lacked a few things. A clear research question and a hypothesis. The paragraphs were not clear and consist, I felt that I had to dig to get certain information. The paper was very wordy, which made me have a hard time understanding the substance.

1. Sources are cited in the body of the paper using APA format (up to 5 points)

Both authors have PhD and work with the Center for Medicine, Health, and Society, which makes them experts on the field. Also the data used in their examples is from recent years, which make their data reliable.

Did you summarize the article in your own words including the finding of the study? Yes

I do not believe the article can be improved upon. It has statistics and studies proving the point it was trying to make. It also does not make fake or biased claims and has a very precise assessment.

The article is very well writing and seems to be very well researched in many areas throughout the entire article. What I am not impressed with is the way that the author executed some of the beginnings and endings of topics. There were some instances where it did not make any sense to me.

The way the author wrote this editorial was okay. I felt as if they didn’t explain what their opinion was. However, the author did provide information to help understand what was going on. In my opinion, even though it’s

Additionally, I think, even when you paraphrase a statement from an article a parenthetical citation must be used but all in all I think you did a wonderful job.

1. List the title of the article , author (s) , and the name of the journal of the peer - reviewed journal

Who is the primary audience for the article? Why? (Give reasons for your answer, providing clear evidence from article). Avoid giving multiple answers.

The abstract provides a nice summary of the article including the purpose, method, results and conclusion of the study. There is no real sense of urgency portrayed in the abstract because the authors fail to explain what the problem is that the study is aimed at researching. The authors do include the applicability of their

Even though the authors have valid points and cite credible sources, their argument fails to be effective in several ways. For one,