Paid Argumentative Essay

Every year, thousands of student athletes across the world sign the NCAA’s 08-3A Form, also called the “Student-Athlete” form, which waives their right to receive money for the use of their name and image. Like many of us in this class, these college athletes devote their time to their academics while spending additional hours with training and practices throughout the day and receive no stipend in return. This 08-3A form defines college athletes as amateurs, who cannot receive payment for playing their desired sport. While their schools and coaches may make millions of dollars in salaries and endorsement deals and are the highest-paid public employees in many states due to their performances in their desired sport, these “amateurs” can never

In 1995, several years after he stepped down as the NCAA’s executive director of 36 years, Walter Byers published Unsportsmanlike Conduct: Exploiting College Athletes. The title didn’t belie the book’s content. Among Byers’ confessions was the deception he sought in coining the well-worn phrase “student-athlete” to describe college athletes.

The National College Athletic Association, better known as the NCAA has been involved in constant turmoil for quite some time now. In the college sports world, there are two variant sides by which neither can come to a final decision. Those side are for and against paying college athletes for participation. While some agree that “coaches are paid too much for players to be struggling to buy food” (Connolly), some actually seem to disagree. Agree or disagree, the athletes deserve a resolution because the longer the issue, the longer the struggle. The two side fail to realize that their arguments and discord does

For about a decade, the debate between whether collegiate athletes should be paid while playing has been contemplated. Now, the focus has moved from all sports to two specific areas, football and men’s basketball. Sprouting from many court cases filed against the NCAA to some ugly sandals dealing with the athletes themselves. In the 2010 – 2011 time frame, this controversy really sparked up chatter; eventually leading the current pled for sport reformation. Our student athletes are the ones who are at the expense here stuck in between this large argument. Over the past 10 years, there has been minor things done for either side and the players themselves have started taking things into their own hands. The year 2010 a total of 7 student

Whether the sport is basketball, baseball, volleyball, football or swimming, college athletes bring in an immense amount of surplus revenue and popularity to the college they attend. For example, a study held by Orlando Sentinel estimates that the University of Texas Athletic Program had the highest income of any other university at $120,288,370 (Robbins). Given the amount of money generated for the university, no player was legally paid for their athletic performance. According to NCAA regulations, "You are not eligible for participation in a sport if you have ever taken pay, or the promise of pay, for competing in that sport” (Staff. 2). With that regulation being stated, it has been rumored athletes are being paid through black markets. Josh Luchs, a sports agent who broke many NCAA violations however, now fights for NCAA reform stated, "Inside Higher Education reported that 53 of 120 FBS schools were caught violating NCAA rules in between 2001-10” (Dohrmann).

Daugherty, Paul. "College Athletes Already Have Advantages and Shouldn't Be Paid." SI.com. Sports Illistrated, 20 Jan. 2010. Web. 27 Feb. 2014. In this article, Paul Daugherty describes various reasons why college athletes should NOT be paid. He gives various hypothetical, yet real situations of what could happen as well as the straight up facts of the case. He explains that schools that have created a historically wealthy background could shell out more money than other schools for the best players, creating a gap that would result in 6 or 7 elite teams and the rest would all be just average. He also explains how the current financial system for student athletes is quite enough reimbursement for bringing in the amount of money to the school that they do. This article will prove to be very helpful in arguing the negative side to paying athletes.

Day in and day out college athletes work endlessly in practice, school and work without any type of reward. Over the past couple of decades universities have attempted to get the NCAA to allow these universities to give student athletes some type of money for their work and dedication. In John Nocera’s NY Times article, “A Way to Start Paying College Athletes,” he uses strong logical reasoning and credible sources to effectively educate his audience. However, he drastically changes his tone when discussing certain ideas, by indirectly calling out those who do not believe in his way of paying college athletes.

Specific Purpose: To persuade the SPC-112-W003 class on why college athletes should be getting paid.

(Solomon 1) In the NCAA there are many laws that prevent the athletes from doing certain things. These laws are called the “Laws of Amateurism”. In general, amateurism requirements do not allow salary for participating in athletics, or prize money above actual or necessary expenses (NCAA Center). However Judge Claudia Wilken partially granted class action status in a lawsuit concerning the use of college athletes' names and likenesses. U.S. District Judge Claudia Wilken ruled the plaintiffs, including former and current Division I men's basketball players and Football Bowl Subdivision players, will be allowed to challenge the NCAA's current restrictions on what athletes might receive in exchange for playing sports. The ruling sets up the prospect of a fundamental change in scholarship rules and the concept of amateurism (Berkowitz 3). This would help athletes to be able to fight for the compensated pay.

When the NCAA was established in March of 1904, both players as well as coaches were not allowed to be paid. Now many years later, once volunteer coaches, are now worth millions dollars and college athletes make nothing. The athletes who bring the most revenue to school, will see none of it because of the strict rules put in place by the NCAA. There are many arguments against paying college athletes such as; there is not enough money or scholarship is enough, but if wanted a way could be found to pay these athletes. The ‘students’ are forced to miss classes for games and practices, which could hurt their grades and may lead to failing the class. Most of the student athletes would

Billy preston had a bright future but he may not get to play basketball for the rest of his life. The NCAA is very strict on these rules. They must receive no money from anybody but teammates or parents. O’Bannon and 19 others sued the NCAA, claiming the organization violated United States antitrust laws by not allowing athletes to get a share of the revenues generated from the use of their images in broadcasts and video games. Many former collegiate players were compensated, but some felt it was inadequate and they were owed more.

The reason they are arguing is because, the NCAA is a multibillion dollar business. For

Colleges illegally pay college athletes for their services. This choice has caused uprisings in the college athletic world. Even though college athletes can't legally accept benefits, there are still people who accept them without the approval of the NCAA. These violations lead to players getting suspended from their athletics as well as getting in problems with the NCAA. These punishments also hurt the students academics as well. The NCAA president stated, "Rather than push college athletics further and further from academics, we need to bring it closer" (Emmert). The NCAA wants to connect athletics and academics and bring

The NCAA was established in 1950 and currently has over 1,100 colleges. The NCAA has a broad range of rules, but for the purposes of the case, the rules in question deals with eligibility requirements, the number and size of scholarships each school can offer, and whether the student athletes can be compensated and for what they can be compensated for. All of these variables are under the strict control and decision of the NCAA, which currently states that student athletes cannot receive compensation outside of the set rules. The student athletes are considered as being compensated by scholarships and higher education but are limited to compensation that require the student’s athletic skills to be performed outside of

Recently there has been an increase in awareness regarding the companies paying college athletes for wearing their brands, and could lead to them being classified as employees and capable of collective bargaining. In colleges across the U.S., it is against university policy for players to accept or receive endorsements or be paid by companies while still participating in college athletics. There have been numerous cases where players have been suspended, along with their coaches and anyone with known information, because of brand companies supplying specifically targeted players with money, cars and clothes to market their products.