Contents
Introduction to the Company 2 SWOT analysis 3 Strengths 3 Weakness 3 Opportunities 4 Threats 4
Industry Analysis 5 Overview 5 Industry Structure (Based On Product Offerings) 5 Five Forces Analysis 5 Competitive Rivalry (High) 5 Bargaining Power of Suppliers (Low) 6 Bargaining Power over Buyers (Medium) 6 Threat of Substitutes (High) 6 Entry of New Players (High) 6
Ratio Analysis 7 Profitability Ratios 7 Growth Ratios 7 Efficiency Ratios 7 Financial Strength Ratios 8 Dividend Ratios 8 Management Effectiveness Ratios 8
Discounted Cash Flow Valuation 9 Calculation of Weighted Average Cost of Capital 9 Cost of Equity Calculation 9 Pro Forma
…show more content…
It presently has 5 branches in Metro Manila located in Tomas Morato, Eastwood City, Fort Bonifacio Global City, and Glorietta 4, and Trinoma.
Industry Structure (Based On Product Offerings)
The branded / unbranded restaurant industry comprises of the following major specialities:
1. Traditional Filipino restaurants
2. Japanese speciality restaurants
3. Chinese speciality restaurants
4. Italian/Continental speciality restaurants
5. Other/World cuisine restaurants
The restaurant business is exceedingly competitive and comprises of restaurants catering to various specialities.
Five Forces Analysis
Competitive Rivalry (High)
Since the industry is liberalized with multiple established players, there is very high degree of competitive rivalry in the industry. This has led to the reduction in costs across product categories and has reduced the profitability margins of all the players. In come cases it has also led to establishment of speciality niches.
Bargaining Power of Suppliers (Low)
Since the raw materials for this industry are predominantly commodities, the bargaining power of suppliers is very low. Further, with increased fragmentation in supply, the suppliers are forced to compete amongst themselves rendering any threat from them non existent.
Bargaining Power over Buyers (Medium)
The buyers consist of end users/retail consumers and, in some cases, other institutions. Since, the industry is competitive; the
Since the early 1990s, the players in the market have copied each other's innovations and this has led to very little differentiation of products in the market. Customers in this industry are very price sensitive and little differentiation allows them to shop around for the best deal. In businesses, there was also a trend towards contracts with multiple suppliers and this further increased customer power. These factors combined have led to lower industry attractiveness since 1990.
The bargaining power of suppliers is low because of the presence of powerful buyers who are able to direct terms to the suppliers who are generally small firms. Besides these suppliers of tires, parts, electronic, mechanical equipment are small players and may have only one or two clients (ancillaries).
The Bargaining Power of Suppliers (Moderate): Most of the industry’s products are sourced and manufactured by a network of third parties. The supplier group is diluted compared to the industry; KMD alone has over 45 suppliers. There is credible threat of suppliers adopting forward integration resulting in loss of major suppliers and emergence of new competitors for the industry. Highly effective and specialised products will pose high supplier switching costs for industry firms.
Bargaining Power of Suppliers: The bargaining power of suppliers in the industry is low. There are numerous suppliers in this industry, and the large department stores have the ability to negotiate for the lowest prices. In addition, the switching costs are low, as the products are not highly differentiated. There are a large volume of purchases in the industry, allowing the department stores to exert even more power over the suppliers.
The bargaining power of suppliers for raw materials is low, while for facilities is high.
Buyers (consumers) have a great deal of bargaining power because the buyer has a variety of brands to choose from and a lot of options to choose from such as precook, fresh, roasted and boneless.
Supplier Power: This highlights that it is easy for suppliers to rise up their prices. This is determined by the number of suppliers, the uniqueness of their product, their control over the buyer, and the cost of changing from one buyer to another. The scarcer the supplier choices you might have, and the more you need the help and that
Existing Competitors. Rivalry among competitors within an industry use price discounting, new products, marketing, and other techniques to be competitive. Profitability of an industry suffers from high rivalry. The intensity with which companies compete and the basis on which they compete determine to which degree rivalry brings down an industry’s profitability (Porter, 2008). Pure competition is considered by economists as a competition with a high
Competitive rivalry exists between companies with the same or similar products/services and similar markets. Factors to be considered include:
The depth of the product line and buying power created by the potential volume makes the threat of suppliers a relative non-issue.
If suppliers are limited, they have a greater opportunity to charge higher prices for raw materials, and they may also pose a threat of forward integration to the industry. Similarly, if an industry has few buyers, or buyers can cheaply and easily change suppliers, they can make demands for less expensive higher quality products, causing impact to profit (Porter, 2008, p. 83).
The Competition: Suppliers need to be able to keep costs down, in order to keep
A supplier group have even more power over an industry if it is dominated by a few companies, there are no substitute products, the industry is not an important consumer for the suppliers, their product is essential to the industry, the supplier differs costs, and forward integration potential of the supplier group exists. Labor supply can also influence the position of the suppliers. These factors are generally out of the control of the industry or company but strategy can alter the power of
Bargaining power of suppliers is low due to large number of suppliers of raw materials, low switching cost and availability of attractive substitutes. (Jim Wilkinson, 2013) Therefore, we could control the price of raw materials because we can easily switch to different suppliers with lower price and higher quality, increasing our profit consequently.
For example, Boeing and Airbus supply most commercial aircraft. The concentration within the suppliers segment of the industry makes it very difficult for competitors to exercise leverage over another supplier and obtain lower prices. The power of the supplier is one key in prohibiting the ability of competitors to earn higher profits.