preview

Panda Syndrome

Better Essays
Open Document

As incoming chair of the ALA Committee on Education, the Editor of JELIS has invited me to reflect on the state, direction and future prospects for LIS education. To put his request in context he asked “how do we educate for the future, not for the past”. Ironically, I happened to be reflecting on this very question as my own master’s program, where I am a professor and former director, had just reduced its degree credit hours from 42 to 36—and I wondered if this was forward or backward looking. The change came without a careful and thorough review of the curriculum and a revised structure, making me anxious about enabling us to continue to deliver a diverse and quality master’s program. In my opinion no professional LIS program should justify …show more content…

Almost 20 years ago Margaret Stieg spoke of Darwinism and the closing of Library Schools, as did Marion Paris in her dissertation research. Around the same time, in 1996, Nancy Van House, in a paper entitled “The Panda Syndrome: An Ecology of LIS Education” used ecological theory to warn against the extinction of LIS education, because like the Panda, it was failing to adapt to new environments, seek out new niches, or explore alternative resources. In this research Van House put forth several adaptive strategies some of which have taken root in the form of school mergers, alternative delivery formats, and as Andy Dillon, from UT, Austin, recently suggested in a JELIS article, by iSchool branding. With all of these developments has anything really changed? The stamp on the forehead is “NO” for those programs that are teaching for the past, and “YES” for those programs that are teaching for the future. In this editorial I will only have time to speak for the future, interjecting teaching and learning considerations where I see those lacking in future oriented programs. In my concluding thoughts I will address issues of accreditation, the iSchool movement, and

Get Access