Pantheon Vs Parthenon

The Parthenon, built around 490 BCE, was one of the most explicit structures created in the Classical Era. Made from marble, it measures roughly 228 feet long and 100 feet wide, huge in comparison to the Pantheon which is located in Rome. The Parthenon was constructed and dedicated to the goddess Athena, while the Pantheon

The Parthenon at the Acropolis in Athens, Greece, built between 447 BCE and 432 BCE to honor the Greek goddess Athena. The Parthenon located in the acropolis is located on the top of a big hill. This could be a tactic to protect the structure from invaders, however, this is also symbolic of wanting to be closer to the gods, in this case closer to Athena. This great architectural piece made of huge slabs of marble creates a sense of grandness only the gods deserved. The architect included relief sculpture of larger than

The Pantheon, built in Rome around AD 126, is in great condition yet today. More massive than the Parthenon, the exterior of the Pantheon still looks smoother. The eight Corinthian columns that line the front entrance are not as intrusive as the Doric columns of ancient Greece. They are thinner and ornately decorated. Also, the Pantheon gains its giant size because of its high walls, not by resting its foundation on a mountainous staircase. Again, this makes the temple more delicate than the Parthenon and this difference also infers that the Romans felt much more secure from the dangers of invasion. Unlike the Parthenon that was destroyed by enemies, the Pantheon still stands content. Continuing inside, the walls of the Pantheon are intrinsically a genius of splendor. They are decorated with ornate designs of Corinthian columns and mock windows. The beauty of the three dimensional wall fixtures is exemplified by sunlight let in by the large oculus at its zenith.

The Parthenon in Athens, overlooks the city and the Aegean sea from atop a hill. The views from and of the building are impressive from any angle. The building was constructed during the high classical period and has both Doric

It stands magnificently on top of a hill and can be seen from miles away, even at night, because it is illuminated and the lighting adds to its ethereal expression. The Parthenon had undergone adjustments including rebuilding which was completed in 432 (Bruno, 1974). One of the builders, Iktinos, has been given credit because he seemingly, non-coincidentally, had the columns built to 10.34m which reaches the height of the Temple of Zeus (Hurwit, 1999). Although it is unclear how the Parthenon got its name, according to Jeffrey M. Hurwit (1999), the word Parthenon is translated into “a room of the virgins,” and that the statue of Athena gave the building the name, not the reverse. He goes on to state that even though the building may look like a temple, it did not function as one, nor is there evidence of an altar. It is unlike anything else, and provokes emotion and- harmony and pleasure which cannot be found in nature (Bruno, 1974). The Parthenon stands in partial ruins, as attempted destruction of the Acropolis occurred due to violent uprisings, conflicts, occupations, vandalism, and a terrible explosion which occurred when ammunition was stored in one of the buildings and it exploded. The Parthenon is made of limestone and marble which would have stood the test of time were it not for human interventions. The site remains under renovation and daily pilgrimages occur to

The Parthenon, a temple of the Doric order, is one of the greatest artistic accomplishments of the fifth century. The Parthenon is viewed without mythological reference and stands far outside the normal Greek temple decoration, which is commonly known to derive its subject matter from the mythical past. (Connelly 53) The Parthenon is different from most other Grecian art of the fifth century and is truly beautiful. One of the greatest reasons the Parthenon is set apart as a great feat in Grecian art is due to its different stylization and the fact that the entire temple is built from the finest white marble throughout the entire piece, including the roof. (Stockstad) The Parthenon is a gorgeous testament to the "Athenian citizenry participating in their annual

The Altar of Zeus transitioned from Parthenon’s traditional architectural concept and function yet gave a more decorative purpose and artistic details to the architecture. It is not hard to see that the artists in Hellenistic period who designed and constructed the Altar of Zeus purposely wanted the observant to focus more on the majestic size and delicate refinement of the architecture than the ones in conventional Athenian period. Compared to the traditional alter that served as an outside subordinate to the main Parthenon temple that practiced votive sacrificing to the goddess Athena, the Altar of Zeus continued with the traditional structural element of the Athenian Parthenon, including columns, entablatures and internal walls, yet at the same time, expanded the depth of the altar and widened the distance between the columns to create a more inviting extent that naturally attracts the observations to the interior décor of the temple, which is a symbolic transition from classical Greek visual and structural balance to Hellenistic’s choice

"The Parthenon...enjoys the reputation of being the most perfect Doric temple ever built. Even in antiquity, its architectural refinements were legendary.”

The Parthenon and the Pantheon feels like they are the same thing, except that it is spelled differently. In reality, they are two different buildings in two different countries. I actually made a mistake thinking that the Parthenon was the Pantheon and vice versa. The Parthenon is in Greece which follows Greek art in that time. The Pantheon is in Italy, and was a building created by the Roman Empire. Unfortunately, the Parthenon is in ruins because it hasn’t been recently used. The Pantheon has been in use for nearly 2,000 years, so it still looks magnificent even until now. There are many other differences and similarities between these two buildings, which I will explain in this paper.

Any civilization, race or nations is characterized by some specific elements or characteristics. The way houses and buildings are made play also a crucial role in people lives and the culture of this civilization. In this assignment we are to consider how the style and function (use) of each building in the ancient Rome and Greece. In addition to this, I will consider the similarities and differences that exist between ancient Greece and Rome. Having a basic understanding of these two influential cultures is helpful when considering the whole history of Western art.

In this essay I am going to compare the two famous buildings of the classical era; the Parthenon in Athens and the Pantheon in Rome. These two building of striking similarity to a casual eye, have a lot of differences and these differences informs us of the cultures that created them. I argue that the cultures that created them have left a lot of traces which could shed light into understanding these cultures. Without further due, we can delve into the comparative exercise.

The outdoors are a way to explore a vividly beautiful world and to do so much more. It’s not just about the trees and the flowers, but it’s about exploring and learning new material every day about nature and wildlife. The outdoors is a creative place to learn, have some fun, provides health benefits, and activities, such as hiking.

The Parthenon is known to be one of the most known temples in the world. Thousands of people travel to Greece to see this legendary piece of art. One thing that visitors love to see when they visit the Parthenon is how typical it is to its time period. The structure of the building is how you would expect a building from the B.C era would be. Surrounded by columns; eight on each end and seventeen on the sides. The Parthenon is a Doric temple and also has some ionic elements on the inside. The outside consists of the shaft (column), the capital (the top), architrave, the frieze (triglyphs and metope’s) and the cornice. This is also known as the Doric order. However, on the inside you can see hints of some ionic elements. There is a frieze that goes all around the interior that is filled with sculptures. There was also a small room inside that had four ionic columns. If you could see the metope’s closely, you could see the sculptures are very belligerent. Many characters are seen fighting in some sort of war. Similar to what the Athenians went through with the Persians.

The Parthenon in Athens is one of the most icon structures when we think Greece. This amazing piece of architecture still stands todays because of the integrity of ancient builders. This building is a long rectangle with its roof being held up by several wide and decorated columns. The Parthenon has a very complex design including Doric and Ionic orders.

" The Parthenon is a non - architectural work, but no longer a masterpiece of art, and in the case of the history of sculpture, we can say that who does not like the Parthenon, no aesthetic sensibility. If, going to Roman architecture, we see many reconstructions of monuments of the Empire and imagine the space and taste of the Forums in their primitive state, we can conclude that many Roman buildings were not works of art, but we can never say they were not architecture. the internal space is present in great way, and while the Romans had not the sensitive refinement of the sculptors-architects Greeks, had, on the contrary, the genius of builders-architects, which basically is the genius of architecture. Even though they did not know prolong